Skip to content

The Efficacy of the Longeviti ClearFit Implant in Craniectomies for Post-Operative Monitoring in Chronic Subdural Hematomas

The Efficacy of the Longeviti ClearFit Implant in Craniectomies for Post-Operative Monitoring in Chronic Subdural Hematomas

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06127615
Enrollment
0
Registered
2023-11-13
Start date
2024-12-31
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2025-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Brief summary

Chronic subdural hematomas are frequent neurosurgical issues that are most often treated with burr hole craniectomies to drain the subdural fluid. At the chronic stage, a subdural hematoma is more liquified and easily washed out through burr hole openings. However, it often requires frequent imaging and monitoring to ensure that fluid does not reaccumulate in the subdural space, that the washout was adequate, and that further intervention/repeat intervention is not required, particularly if the patient develops acute changes in neurologic status or lacks improvement in initial symptomatology. Therefore, these patients require multiple repeated CT head images during their inpatient and post-operative follow-up course. This leads to high radiation doses to patients and high-cost burden. The Longeviti ClearFit Cover was developed to allow for ultrasound imaging through the implanted cover. The skull's acoustic properties prevent ultrasound from being used through the bone, therefore limiting its use in post-operative neurosurgical patients. Using ultrasound would remove the need for high radiation doses with CT, could be done very quickly and easily at bedside or in the clinic to check subdural space or ventricle size, and is much lower cost. This ClearFit implant would be utilized in place of a burr hole cover, typically titanium, that is implanted in most other cases. The aim of this study is to prospectively assess patients with surgically treated chronic subdural hematomas via craniectomy that have the craniectomy site covered with the Longeviti ClearFit, compared retrospectively to a matched cohort of patients that had their craniectomy site for the same procedure covered with the typically used titanium/metal. This will allow us to determine if this new implant results in reduced need for repeated CT imaging by utilizing bedside clinician-performed ultrasound and reduces overall cost for patients.

Interventions

DEVICEClearFit

Implantation of ClearFit Longeviti Craniectomy Cover

Sponsors

University of Kansas Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients \>18 years old; patients determined by surgeon to have a chronic subdural hematoma that is treated with craniectomy that would allow for implantation of a ClearFit cover

Exclusion criteria

* Pediatric patients, patient with allergy to the material the implant is made with (polymethylmethacrylate)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Radiationfrom time of implant to last follow-up, anticipate 1 yearAmount of radiation exposure to patient with ClearFit obtaining ultrasounds rather than CT compared to retrospective control group
Patient costfrom time of implant to last follow-up, anticipate 1 yearOverall cost to patient with ClearFit compared to retrospective control group

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of imagingfrom time of implant to last follow-up, anticipate 1 yearCalculated based on number of cross-overs from ultrasound to CT or MRI, with noted reason for crossover. Analysis of how often ultrasound is unable to be used/not feasible for post-operative monitoring of subdural, statistical analysis of crossover out of ultrasound into CT/MRI cranial imaging
Provider experience caring for patientfrom time of implant to last follow-up, anticipate 1 yearSurvey of ease to care for patient in post-operative time period, ultrasound for imaging, transport of patient to obtain imaging, ease of access

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026