Pain, Postoperative
Conditions
Keywords
regional block, pudendal block
Brief summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the catheter related bladder discomfort in patients who will undergoing TUR-P operation. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is sacral ESPB effective on the pudendal nerve dermatome? * Is sacral ESPB as useful as pudendal block on CRBD? Participants will be divided into two groups and the first group will receive sacral espb after TUR-p operation and the second group will receive pudendal block. Investigators will be present for 24 hours * catheter related bladder discomfort * post-operative pain, * additional analgesic needs will be questioned and the difference between the two groups will be evaluated.
Detailed description
This is a prospective,randomised,double-blind, single-centre,study aiming to compare the effectiveness of US guided bilateral sacral ESPB and US guided bilateral pudendal block on CRBD and pain after TUR-P. 54 patients will be included in the study and divided into two groups. All patients will be standardly monitored and will receive general anaesthesia. At the end of the cases, sacral ESPB will be applied to the first group and pudendal block to the second group, and the patients and the data questioner physician will be blinded to the study. Primary and secondary outcomes will be questioned for 24 hours and statistics will be made according to the result.
Interventions
PROCEDURESacral ESP Block
Sacral ESPB median approach, 40 ml %0,25 Bupivacaine
PROCEDUREPudendal Block
Bilateral pudendal block, 10 ml %0,25 bupivacaine
Sponsors
Giresun University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
\- American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) Physical status 1-3
Exclusion criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) Physical status 4-5 * Refused to participate in the study * Known allergy to local anaesthetic * Where regional anaesthesia is contraindicated * With known neurological, haematological or muscular disease * Patients with infection or anatomical changes in the lumbo-sacral region
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Catheter related bladder discomfort, 0:no discomfort 4:worst discomfort | baseline ,and 24 hours | It was evaluated with a 4-point scoring system developed and first used by Agarwall et al. . No symptoms: 0, Mild: mild discomfort that can be tolerated, Moderate: discomfort is present but not accompanied by behavioural reactions, Severe: discomfort is very severe and accompanied by body movements indicating that the patient cannot bear it. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Numerical Rating Scale,0 :no pain 10:worst pain | baseline, and 24 hours | The NRS score of the patients was 0: no pain, 10: the most severe pain experienced. An NRS value of 4 and above indicates that the pain is severe and rescue analgesia is required. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed