Peripheral Arterial Disease
Conditions
Keywords
Viabahn endoprosthesis, Drug-coated balloon
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Viabahn endoprosthesis for treating long femoropopliteal lesions (stenosis ≥ 25cm, occlusion ≥ 15cm) or recurrent in-stent restenosis compared to drug-coated balloons (DCB) with or without a bailout bare nitinol stent.
Detailed description
This is a multicenter, prospective, 1:1 randomized clinical trial with clinical and image follow-up for two years post-procedure. Approximately 60 subjects will be enrolled and randomized into a Viabahn preferred group (study arm) or drug-coated balloons (DCB) group (control arm); Each group will include 30 patients. All enrolled patients will be followed up for 12 months to assess the incidence of restenosis by duplex ultrasound and major adverse events. Follow-up visits occur at 12 and 24 months, as well as telephone visits after 1, 6, 9 and 24 months.
Interventions
Patients underwent endovascular treatment for femoropopliteal lesions. The lesion will be treated by Viabahn endoprosthesis.
Patients underwent endovascular treatment for femoropopliteal lesions. The lesion will be treated by drug-coated balloon.
Sponsors
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
Qingdao Haici Hospital
Liyuan Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Fudan University
Huashan Hospital
Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital, Xiamen University
RenJi Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. The patient presented a score from 2 to 5 following Rutherford classification. 2. The patient is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations at the specified times. 3. The patient is ≥ 18 years old. 4. Patient understands the nature of the procedure and provides written informed consent before enrolment in the study 5. The patient has a projected life expectancy of at least 24 months 6. Before enrolment, the guidewire has crossed the target lesion 7. Subject has a de novo or restenotic lesion with ≥ 70% stenosis in femoropopliteal artery, and for de novo lesion, the total lesion length ≥ 25cm, or chronic total occlusion (CTO) length ≥15cm. 8. There is angiographic evidence of patent infrageniculate popliteal artery and at least one distal runoff to the foot. 9. Origin and proximal 1 cm of Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA) are patent. 10. Reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥ 4 mm by visual estimation.
Exclusion criteria
1. Previous bypass surgery or stenting in the target vessel 2. Patients who exhibit acute intraluminal thrombus at the target lesion vessel 3. Patients with known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications: Nitinol-titanium, antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulants, or thrombolytics therapy 4. Pregnant women or Female patients with potential childbearing 5. Use of thrombectomy, atherectomy, or laser devices during the procedure 6. Untreated inflow disease of the ipsilateral pelvic arteries (more than 50% stenosis or occlusion) 7. The patient is currently participating in another investigational drug or device study that interferes with the study 8. Significant renal dysfunction (Serum creatinine \>3.0mg/dl) 9. Patient with Known allergy to contrast media 10. Significant gastrointestinal bleeding or any coagulopathy that would contraindicate the use of anti-platelet therapy. 11. Femoral or popliteal aneurysm. 12. Current peritoneal or hemodialysis.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Primary patency | 24-month | Peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR ≤2.4) without any repeat intervention. |
| Freedom from a composite of Major adverse events (MAEs) | 24-month | Freedom from MAEs is defined as freedom from clinically-driven target vessel revascularization (CD-TVR), major amputation, and all-cause of death |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary patency | 24-month | Secondary patency is defined as maintaining patency in the target vessel after a repeat intervention to correct complete occlusion in the treated arterial segment. |
| Clinically-driven target vessel revascularization (CD-TVR) | 24-month | clinically-driven target vessel revascularization (CD-TVR) is defined as repeat intervention performed during enrollment in the clinical study. |
| Procedural success | Immediately after interventional surgery | Procedural success is defined as technical or device success without major adverse events during the hospital stay. |
| Secondary sustained clinical improvement | 24-month | Defined as a sustained upward shift of at least one category on the Rutherford classification3, including the need for repeated target lesion revascularization (TLR) in surviving patients. |
| Vasc quality of life score | 24-month | Change of Vasc quality of life score |
| Primary sustained clinical improvement | 24-month | Defined as a sustained upward shift of at least one category on the Rutherford classification without the need for repeated target lesion revascularization (TLR) in surviving patients. |
| Primary assisted patency | 24-month | Primary assisted patency is defined as maintaining patency in the target vessel after a repeat intervention to regain patency prior to complete occlusion. |
Countries
China
Contacts
Primary ContactQihong Ni, M.D.
Outcome results
None listed