Catheter Ablation, Low Voltage Areas, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Conditions
Brief summary
An effective therapy of persistent atrial fibrillation beyond pulmonary vein isolation remains unsatisfactory. Targeting endocardial low-voltage areas represents an approach of substrate modification. This prospective, randomized study investigated the efficacy of ablation of low-voltage areas versus PVI and additional linear ablations in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation in terms of single-procedure arrhythmia-free outcome and safety.
Detailed description
Pulmonary vein isolation has become the cornerstone of the interventional treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. For the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation the data remains unclear. All different approaches remain unsatisfactory for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation, including single pulmonary vein isolation, targeting endocardial areas of low-voltage, identifying areas with complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE), ablating linear lines such as an anterior line, a roof-line or mitral isthmus line. Recurrence rates are still higher as compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation. Several studies showed a good correlation between the volume of low-voltage areas (LVA) and the burden of atrial fibrillation. Earlier studies that investigated ablation therapy using a substrate-guided ablation as compared to circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) alone, mostly showed no significant difference in recurrence rates between both approaches. In contrast, some other studies showed better outcomes when targeting low-voltage areas. However, there was significant heterogeneity in patient selection, mapping and ablation strategies and therefore, comparisons are hard to make. The patients are randomized into three different treatment arms (Group 1: PVI alone if no low voltage areas are detected, Group 2: PVI alone if low voltage areas are detected, Group 3: PVI plus ablation of low voltage areas.
Interventions
Pulmonary vein isolation and ablation of low voltage areas.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation are included in the study. They are randomized into three diffrenet treatment arms depending on the presence of left atrial fibrosis.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Persistent atrial fibrillation according to the current guidelines * Age \> 18 years * Patient information
Exclusion criteria
* Minors
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants with atrial arrhythmia recurrence after 12 months follow-up | 12 months | Number of participants with atrial arrhythmia recurrence after 12 months follow-up |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of procedural complications | 12 months | Number of procedural complications. |
Countries
Germany