Skip to content

Device Assisted Full Thickness Resection Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors

Device Assisted Full Thickness Resection Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06121752
Acronym
DNET
Enrollment
54
Registered
2023-11-08
Start date
2023-11-10
Completion date
2025-03-30
Last updated
2024-10-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuroendocrine Tumors

Brief summary

Introduction : The incidence of duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (DNETs) is increasing. Endoscopic resection is recommended for the management of small DNETs measuring ≤10 mm. Various endoscopic techniques have been utilized for the resection of DNETs including endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), band ligation assisted EMR, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, the published studies report a high rate of histologically incomplete resection even with ESD. More recently, device assisted endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) has emerged as a safe and effective resection modality in cases with upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal as well as submucosal lesions. There is limited data on the outcomes of EFTR in cases with DNETs. In this study, we aim to compare the rate of histologically complete resection (R0) with ESD and EFTR in cases with DNETs.

Detailed description

Primary objective: Rate of R0 resection in both the groups Secondary outcomes: 1. Technical success: defined as en-bloc resection of the lesion without any residual lesion endoscopically 2. Procedure duration 3. Adverse Events Inclusion criteria: 1. Adult patients (≥18 years) with biopsy proven duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (DNETs) 2. Size of the lesion \<15 mm 3. Absence of local and distant metastases (EUS and DOTANOC scan) 4. Willing to provide informed consent Exclusion criteria: 1. Large lesions \>15 mm 2. Invasion of muscularis layer and beyond on imaging (EUS) 3. Scarring or deformity in duodenum 4. Active duodenal ulcer 5. History of prior resection 6. Coagulopathy

Interventions

PROCEDUREEndoscopic submucosal dissection

Endoscopic resection is recommended for the management of small DNETs measuring ≤10 mm. Various endoscopic techniques have been utilized for the resection of DNETs including endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), band ligation assisted EMR, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, the published studies report a high rate of histologically incomplete resection even with ESD. More recently, device assisted endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) has emerged as a safe and effective resection modality in cases with upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal as well as submucosal lesions. There is limited data on the outcomes of EFTR in cases with DNETs.

DEVICEEFTR

Initially, the lesion will be marked circumferentially using the FTRD probe available with the device (Forced Coag, E1, 20W). Subsequently, wire guided balloon dilatation of the pyloric channel will be performed. The device will be mounted over a therapeutic channel gastroscope and negotiated across the cricopharynx over the guidewire with or without assistance of dilating balloon available with the device. After reaching the target site, the lesion will be pulled withing the FTRD cap with the help of grasping forceps and gentle suctioning. The clip will be fired after ensuring the entry of the lesion inside the cap, the premounted snare closed and electrocautery activated to cut the grasped tissue (HighCut 200W, Effect 4).

Sponsors

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult patients (≥18 years) with biopsy proven duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (DNETs) 2. Size of the lesion \<15 mm 3. Absence of local and distant metastases (EUS and DOTANOC scan) 4. Willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Large lesions \>15 mm 2. Invasion of muscularis layer and beyond on imaging (EUS) 3. Scarring or deformity in duodenum 4. Active duodenal ulcer 5. History of prior resection 6. Coagulopathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of R0 resection in both the groups7 daysEndoscopically and pathologically complete resection

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Technical success: defined as en-bloc resection of the lesion without any residual lesion endoscopically7 daysEndoscopically complete resection
Procedure duration7 daysTime to complete each procedure in minutes
Adverse Events7 daysAdverse events during and after the procedure

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactZaheer Dr Nabi, MBBS MD DNB
zaheernabi1978@gmail.com04023378888
Backup ContactAyush Dr Singh, MBBS MD
ayush769@gmail.com04023378888

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026