Skip to content

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel, Active-controlled Clinical Study of Silicone Hydrogel Monthly Soft Contact Lens for the Safety and Effectiveness in Visual Correction.

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel, Active-controlled Clinical Study of Silicone Hydrogel Monthly Soft Contact Lens for the Safety and Effectiveness in Visual Correction.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06121531
Enrollment
144
Registered
2023-11-08
Start date
2021-02-01
Completion date
2022-09-28
Last updated
2023-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Brief summary

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens for vision correction.

Interventions

Vision Correction

Sponsors

Yung Sheng Optical Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 20 years old and above. 2. Subjects with normal eyes who are not using any ocular medications (excluding ocular lubricants and artificial tears). 3. Best spectacle corrected visual acuity greater than or equal to 1.0 for both eyes. 4. With +6.00D \ -12.00 D spherical power, and ≦1.00 D astigmatism (based on subjective optometry measurements). 5. Have worn soft contact lens for at least 1 month prior to the study. 6. Willing to comply with the required wearing time and use specified contact lens care product. 7. Agree to comply with all study procedures and signed the informed consent form before enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

1. Anterior chamber infection, inflammation, or abnormality. 2. Any active ocular disease that would affect contact lens wear or vision (such as acute and subacute inflammation of the anterior chamber of the eye, eye infection, uveitis, serious palpebral abnormality, corneal hypoesthesia, corneal epithelium abrasion, dry eye and tear duct defection, ocular allergies, highly suspected glaucoma) upon evaluation by the investigators or slit lamp findings. 3. Currently using systemic or ocular medications that would contraindicate with contact lens wear (such as, glaucoma eye drops, steroid anti-inflammatory drops, eye ointments, eye gels and other eye medicines). 4. History of herpes simplex keratitis. 5. History of refractive surgery, keratoconus, or irregular cornea. 6. Slit lamp findings that are not suitable for inclusion (Details of the grading standards for each eye condition are specified in CIP section 5.7.5 from page 38 to 43). 7. A pathologically dry eye syndrome (Schirmer test \< 5 mm). 8. Have participated in any contact lens or contact lens care product clinical trials within the previous 1 month (excluding questionnaire types and specimen collection). 9. Currently pregnant or lactation. 10. Allergy to any contact lens care product ingredient (such as mercury or topical antimicrobial agent). 11. Have experienced discomfort when wearing hydrogel contact lens. 12. Subjects who are judged unsuitable for the study by the investigators.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The effectiveness of corrected visual acuity3 MonthsThe effectiveness of corrected visual acuity at 3-month. Effectiveness is defined as visual acuities of both eyes correctable to ≥1.0 with contact lens. Effectiveness formula (%): total number of subjects with vision correction of ≥ 1.0 at a given timepoint / total number of subjects enrolled at a given time × 100 %. Definition of total number of subjects enrolled at a given time: the total number of subjects conforming to the PPS criteria and having worn lenses for 3 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average contact lens corrected visual acuity1 week, 1 month, 2 months and 3 monthsThe mean, standard deviation, median, maximum, minimum, Q1, Q3 and Inter-Quartile Range (IQR) will be calculated for Lens corrected visual acuity. Comparisons between the Treatment group and Control group will be made.
Change in diopter (Spherical and cylindrical power of subjective optometry)1 week, 1 month, 2 months and 3 monthsThe mean, standard deviation, median, maximum, minimum, Q1, Q3 and Inter-Quartile Range (IQR) will be calculated for power (the spherical and cylindrical power). Comparisons between the Treatment group and Control group will be made.
Change in corneal astigmatism (the vertical and horizontal keratometry meridian, the power and axis of astigmatism)1 week, 1 month, 2 months and 3 monthsThe mean, standard deviation, median, maximum, minimum, Q1, Q3, and Inter-Quartile Range (IQR) will be calculated for corneal astigmatism (the vertical and horizontal curvature, the power and axis of astigmatism). Comparisons between the Treatment group and Control group will be made.
Effectiveness of corrected visual acuity1 week, 1 month and 2 monthsEffectiveness of corrected visual acuity at 1 week, 1 month and 2 months. The effectiveness (%) is defined as total number of subjects with vision correction of ≥ 1.0 at a given timepoint / total number of subjects enrolled at a given time × 100 %.
Lens fitting (lens centration, lens movement, coverage, and tightness)1 week, 1 month, 2 months and 3 monthsThe total number and percentage of parameters (lens centration, lens movement, coverage, tightness) with grading scale evaluated by investigators will be calculated and analyzed. Comparisons between the Treatment group and Control group will be made.
Subjective acceptance (comfort, vision, lens handling, lens cleaning)1 week, 1 month, 2 months and 3 monthsThe total number and percentage of parameters (comfort, vision, lens handling, lens cleaning) with a grading scale using questionnaires will be calculated and analyzed. Comparisons between the Treatment group and Control group will be made.
Lens state (lens front surface wettability, front surface deposits, back surface deposits)1 week, 1 month, 2 months and 3 monthsThe total number and percentage of parameters (lens front surface wettability, front surface deposits, back surface deposits) with a grading scale evaluated by investigators will be calculated and analyzed. Comparisons between the Treatment group and Control group will be made.
Lens broken rate1 week, 1 month, 2 months and 3 monthsThe number and percentage of parameters (total lenses, unbroken lenses, broken lenses) will be calculated and analyzed. Comparisons between the Treatment group and Control group will be made.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026