Chronic Disease
Conditions
Keywords
physical activity rehabilitation program, Connected scale
Brief summary
The goal of this interventional study is to evaluate the impact of the use of a connected impedance scale on the physical and mental quality of life of patients suffering from chronic diseases and participating in a physical activity rehabilitation program. The main objective is to know if a regular monitoring of the evolution of body composition parameters recorded by the connected scale would allow patients participating in the Physical Activity rehabilitation program at Hôtel-Dieu to follow in real time the effects of such program, not on weight itself but on body composition, and that this would contribute to a better perception of physical and mental quality of life at the end of the program 90 Participants will be randomized in two groups : * Control group (N = 45) : routine care * Interventionnal group (N=45) : routine care + use of connected scale All participants will undergo physical activity rehabilitation program during 6 weeks. Patients will be see again at 6 months, and the following parameters will be comparer between the two groups : * SF-36 questionnaire * Ricci & Gagnon questionnaire * 6MWT * 30 sec sit-to stand test * Ito-Shirado test * Sorensen test * Handgrip test * MaxV02
Interventions
Patients in the intervention group will use the connected scale at a minimum frequency of once a week from receipt of the scale and throughout their participation in the research (6 months)
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Comparative, controlled, randomized by cluster 1:1 open, in two parallel arms
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patient (male or female) aged 18 and over * Patient able to express free, informed and written consent * Patient participating in the physical activity rehabilitation program at the CIMS of the Hôtel Dieu * Patient suffering from a known, stable and diagnosed chronic disease * Patient autonomous in taking treatments for their ALD * Patient affiliated to a social security system
Exclusion criteria
* Patient under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship) * Patient deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision * Patient with functional limitations that do not allow a physical assessment or result in a walking distance \< 350 m during the HDJ for admission to the program * Patient with suspected cardiac pathology during the HDJ for admission to the program * Patient with episode of decompensation or exacerbation * Patient with a pacemaker or implantable automatic defibrillator * Pregnant women
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Measurement of the physical and mental quality of life score using the Short Form 36 questionnaire at 6 months for each patient. | 6 months from initiation of physical activity rehabilitation program | Short Form 36 questionnaire (0 - 100 ; Higher mean better outcome) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Measurement of daily physical activity level by the Ricci & Gagnon questionnaire at 6 months for each patient | 6 months from initiation of physical activity rehabilitation program | Ricci & Gagnon questionnaire (9 - 45 ; Higher mean better outcome) |
| Measurement of 6 minute walk test (6MWT) at 6 months for each patient | 6 months from initiation of physical activity rehabilitation program | 6 minute walk test (Higher mean better outcome) |
| Measurement of 30 sec sit-to-stand test at 6 months for each patient | 6 months from initiation of physical activity rehabilitation program | 30 sec sit-to-stand test (Higher mean better outcome) |
| Measurement of the physical and mental quality of life score using the Short Form 36 questionnaire at 6 weeks for each patient. | 6 weeks from initiation of physical activity rehabilitation program | Short Form 36 questionnaire (0 - 100 ; Higher mean better outcome) |
| Measurement of Sorensen test at 6 months for each patient | 6 months from initiation of physical activity rehabilitation program | Sorensen test (Higher mean better outcome) |
| Measurement of Handgrip test at 6 months for each patient | 6 months from initiation of physical activity rehabilitation program | Handgrip test (Higher mean better outcome) |
| Measurement of VO2max at 6 months for each patient | 6 months from initiation of physical activity rehabilitation program | VO2 |
| Measurement of Ito-Shirado test at 6 months for each patient | 6 months from initiation of physical activity rehabilitation program | Ito-Shirado test (Higher mean better outcome) |
Countries
France