Skip to content

Blood-Based Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Implementation Into Clinical Practice Highlands

Blood-Based Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Implementation Into Clinical Practice in the Outpatient Clinical Settings in the Appalachian Highlands

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06119425
Enrollment
231
Registered
2023-11-07
Start date
2023-10-12
Completion date
2025-04-30
Last updated
2026-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer Colon

Brief summary

This is a prospective implementation study that will include patients that are identified as being average risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) according to USPSTF guidelines and who have opted to be screened for CRC. The purpose of this study is to understand implementation of a noninvasive screening test in primary care and internal medicine clinical settings, and the impact on patient acceptability and adherence of CRC screening.

Detailed description

Study Rationale This is a prospective implementation study that will include patients that are identified as being average risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) according to USPSTF guidelines and who have opted to be screened for CRC. The purpose of this study is to understand implementation of a noninvasive screening test in primary care and internal medicine clinical settings, and the impact on patient acceptability and adherence of CRC screening. Although multiple screening options for CRC are available, participation and adherence to CRC screening remains below the national goal. CRC screening rate at the Ballad Health Mountain Laurel Internal Medicine clinic (site 1) is approximately 66%. A blood-based test (BBT) can provide a clinically important complement to standard-of-care (SOC) screening tests and address unmet medical needs for patients, especially for those who are non-adherent with current screening modalities. There are economic and societal benefits in early detection and prevention of CRC in a broader population than the one currently up to date with screening. The unmet need for maximum participation in CRC screening could be addressed with blood-based testing. Measuring subsequent provider experience and implementation behavior patterns involving blood based non-invasive cancer screening choices will also help to identify clinical utility of such test and implementation into clinical practice.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTblood-based CRC screening

For this study, a commercially available blood-based CRC screening test will be used. The selected test is Shield (Guardant Health, Redwood City, California, USA). The Shield test was developed, and its performance characteristics determined, by the Guardant Health Clinical Laboratory in Redwood City, California, USA, which is certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act of 1988 (CLIA) as qualified to perform high complexity clinical testing. The Shield test is currently commercially available as an laboratory developed test (LDT). Additionally, Guardant submitted the pre-market approval (PMA) application for the Shield test to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in March of 2023. Premarket approval (PMA) is the FDA process of scientific and regulatory review to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of medical devices. To this end, the Shield test is currently under review by the FDA.

Sponsors

Ballad Health
Lead SponsorOTHER
Guardant Health, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 84 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 45-84 years of age (inclusive) * Considered by health-care providers to be "average risk" for CRC as determined by USPSTF guidelines * If a patient opts for blood-based test, they are able and willing to provide blood samples per protocol * Ability to understand and the willingness to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a personal history of CRC * Patients with a known high-risk family history of CRC precluding the patient from being average risk * Patients with known diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease or history of polyps * Patients who are currently symptomatic for CRC such as: blood in the stool * Patients with any known medical condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, should preclude enrollment into the study * Have a recorded up to date CRC screening * Patients with a previous abnormal colonoscopy finding who are due for surveillance.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Opted to be screened for CRC by either SOC or study diagnostic test3 monthsNumber of participants who agree to be screened CRC. % of participants who agree to be screened for CRC.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Opted to be screened by the study diagnostic test3 monthsNumber of participants who opted to be screened by the study diagnostic test instead of

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKaren J. Elmore, MD

Ballad Health

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026