Skip to content

Comparison of Two Different Lightwand Intubation Techniques in Cervical Immobilized Patients

Comparison of the Intubation Success Rate Between Two Techniques Using Lightwand in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: Conventional vs. Face-to-face Technique

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06119360
Enrollment
176
Registered
2023-11-07
Start date
2018-12-12
Completion date
2019-08-31
Last updated
2023-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation; Difficult or Failed

Brief summary

This study compares two different approaches of lightwand intubation techniques in cervical immobilized patients.

Detailed description

This study compares two approaches in lightwand intubation techniques in cervical immobilized patients. One is a conventional approach that involves scooping movement with mandible protraction. The other is a face-to-face approach that inserts lightwand with a front-facing position. This study is conducted as a randomized, prospective, single-blinded design.

Interventions

PROCEDUREFace-to-face approach

A front-facing approach and insert the lightwand following the patient's tongue base curvature without scooping movement

Patients were positioned supine and the intubator stood above the patient's head. Opening the mouth and slightly pulling the mandible with one hand, the intubator inserted the lightwand-tracheal tube assembly at midline into the patient's mouth under the ambient light being turned off. To identify the location of the lighted tip, the intubator could move the lightwand back and forth gently, Once the red light of the tip was located at the midline of the patient's neck, the pre-launched tube was inserted smoothly into the patient's airway unless there was no resistance

Sponsors

Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adults with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1-3 * patients who received scheduled spine surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* patients with body mass index \<18.5 kg/m2 or \>35.0 kg/m2, * patients who previously had head and neck surgery, * patients who are at high risk of aspiration, * patients with pathologic conditions such as tumors, polyps, or inflammation in the airway, * patients who cannot sit due to severe spine deformity, * patients who have compromised cardiopulmonary function patients with clinically significant neurovascular disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Initial success rateduring intubationIntubation success rate at the first attempt

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intubation timeduring intubationTotal time to the successful intubation

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Immediate intubation related outcomesImmediately after general anesthesia (at the post anesthesia care unit)Outcomes after tracheal intubation
24 hours intubation related outcomes24 hours after general anesthesia (at the general ward)Outcomes after tracheal intubation

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026