Dentist's Role
Conditions
Keywords
SDF, Diode Laser, Pits and fissure sealants, primary molars, permanent molars
Brief summary
Primary Objective: Assessing the clinical effect of SDF and Laser on the prevention of initial caries progression with and without pits and fissure sealants in both permanent and primary molars. Secondary Objective: Effect of SDF and Laser Application on the subsequently applied pits and fissure sealants.
Detailed description
Primary Objective: Assessing the clinical effect of SDF and Laser on the prevention of initial caries progression with and without pits and fissure sealants in both permanent and primary molars. Scoring caried out by ICDAS Scoring criteria over a 1 year follow up period Secondary Objective: Effect of SDF and Laser Application on the subsequently applied pits and fissure sealants. Measured by Simonson's criteria over 1 year follow up period.
Interventions
DRUGSDF1
Topical SDF application
DEVICEDiode Laser
Irradiating Enamel by Diode laser
Sealing occlusal pits and fissures
Sponsors
British University In Egypt
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 9 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
.Children aged 6-9 years old. .Patients categorized as moderate to high caries risk (deft index \>1) showing more than 1 new carious lesions or restorations in the last 36 months according to ADA Caries Risk Assessment Form (Age \>6) .A split mouth study design was followed where all four second molars were selected for intervention in the primary molar group, while all first molars were selected for intervention in the permanent molar group. .The four molars selected in each patient (primary / permanent) should be fully erupted with no gingival overhangs /operculum and with no history of previous restorations or prior sealants. .According to International Caries Detection and Assessment System ICDAS grading, molars with (0, 1, 2) scores only were included.
Exclusion criteria
.Uncooperative or mentally challenged patients, with bad oral hygiene or rampant caries. .Patients providing history of bruxism or clenching affecting the posterior occlusion were excluded. .Children with known allergies or sensitivities to resins or silver products. .Molars that showed well-coalesced, self-cleansing pits & fissures or shallow grooves and severe forms of hypoplasia / fluorosis were excluded. .Patients & parents with high esthetic demands and concerns. .Unmotivated patients, or parents who refused to sign the consent form.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of molars with arrested initial decay | 1 year follow up | ICDAS II Score system |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of molars with completely retained f pits and fissure sealants | 1 year follow up | Simonsen's Criteria |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed