Skip to content

the Effects of Different Therapy Regimens on Menopausal Sleep Disorders

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of the Effects of Different Therapy Regimens on Menopausal Sleep Disorders

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06117969
Enrollment
180
Registered
2023-11-07
Start date
2023-12-30
Completion date
2025-09-30
Last updated
2024-01-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Menopause, Sleep Disorder

Brief summary

Sleeping disorders are one of the most common menopausal symptoms, which seriously affect health and life quality of perimenopausal women. Menopausal hormone therapy is an effective treatment for menopausal symptoms, meanwhile, traditional Chinese medicine is also effective to some extent. This prospective randomized controlled study plan to compare the effects of different therapy regimens, including Tibolone and Xiangshao granules, on menopausal sleep disorders.

Interventions

1.25mg po qd

4g po tid

DRUGTibolone plus Xiangshao granules

Tibolone 1.25mg po qd plus Xiangshao granules 4g po tid

Sponsors

Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* women aged 40-60 * natural menopause for 1-10 years * PSQI score \>=11 points * improved K-score\>=14 points * able to independently sign informed consent forms

Exclusion criteria

* Vaginal bleeding of unknown cause * Known or suspected breast cancer and other sex hormone dependent tumors * Active venous or arterial thromboembolic disease within past 6 months * Have used sex hormone or traditional Chinese medicine/botanical drugs that affect menopausal symptoms within the past month * Have used anti anxiety, depression drugs or sedative hypnotics within the past month * Patients with anxiety or depression above moderate level * Severe liver or kidney dysfunction, with transaminase or creatinine level exceeding twice of the normal value * BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2 * Allergies to research drugs * Other situations that doctor deems unsuitable to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Polysomnography (PSG)V0(screening period), V3(week 8)Extract PSG EEG data: record time, bed time, sleep time, awakening time, rapid eye movement sleep time (REM), non rapid eye movement sleep time (NREM), non rapid eye movement sleep phase 1 (N1), non rapid eye movement sleep phase 2 (N2), non rapid eye movement sleep phase 3 (N3), total sleep time (TST), sleep latency (SL), wake after sleep onset (WASO), sleep efficiency (SE).
Pittsburgh Sleep QualityIndex questionnaire (PSQI questionnaire)V0(screening period), V2(week 4), V3(week 8)The total score of PSQI questionnaire is 0-21 points. Normal sleep quality is defined as less than 11 points.
Sleep diaryV0(screening period), V1(dsy 1), V2(week 4), V3(week 8)Sleep diary is recorded by study participants daily.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improved Kupperman scoreV0(screening period), V2(week 4), V3(week 8)The total score of improved K score is graded into four levels: normal(\<7), mild(7-14), moderate(15-29), severe(\>30).
Center for Epidemiological Survey Depression Scale (CES Depression Scale)V0(screening period), V2(week 4), V3(week 8)The total score of CES-D is graded into three levels: asymptomatic(\<15), possible depressive symptoms(16-19), existed depressive symptoms(≥20)
Menopause-specific Quality of Life ScaleV0(screening period), V2(week 4), V3(week 8)Evaluate vasomotor symptoms, psychological and emotional symptoms, physical symptoms and sexual activity symptoms. Choose a level from 0-6 based on the degree to which this symptom affects subject. ''0'' means it doesn't affect subject at all; ''6'' indicates extreme impact on subject.
Self-Rating Anxiety ScaleV0(screening period), V2(week 4), V3(week 8)Assess anxiety level over the past two weeks. The evaluation adopts a 1-4 scoring system, where the scores of 20 questions are added together to obtain the total score. The total score is multiplied by 1.25 and rounded to the nearest whole number to obtain the standard score. The cut-off value of SAS standard score is 50 points, with a score of 50-59 indicating mild anxiety, 60-69 indicating moderate anxiety, and a score above 70 indicating severe anxiety.

Contacts

Primary ContactRong Chen, Professor
chenrongpumch@163.com010-13811030947
Backup ContactLingjin Yang
yanglingjin0803@126.com010-15650795133

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026