Skip to content

Impact of Cilostazol Versus Cilostazol and Selenium Combination on the Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Patients

Impact of Cilostazol Versus Cilostazol and Selenium Combination on the Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06117436
Enrollment
206
Registered
2023-11-07
Start date
2023-10-19
Completion date
2025-01-30
Last updated
2025-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Wound Heal

Brief summary

The growing incidence of DM can lead to the increased prevalence of diabetic foot complications, which have become a serious medical, social, and economic concern of global importance. this study aims to find a novel intervention that improve wound healing in diabetic foot ulcer to improve patients' quality of life, reduce amputation rate, and reduce the mortality rate among diabetic foot ulcer patients

Interventions

DRUGCilostazol

Cilostazol 100 MG oral tablet once daily antiplatelet, Selenium 200mcg tablet once daily, anti oxidant

DRUGSelenium

Selenium 200 mcg oral tablet once daily

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Eligible patients will be adult diabetic patients aged 18 years and older with non-ischemic diabetic foot ulcers Wagner's grade 2, 3, and 4.

Exclusion criteria

1. Wagner's grade 5 patients (because of the indications for amputation). 2. Patients with poor glycemic control at the time of inclusion (HbA1c\>12%). 3. Patients who need either direct graft or indirect revascularization procedure during the study. 4. Patients with Cilostazol or Selenium allergy. 5. Patients with Cilostazol contraindications (Heart Failure, bleeding disorder). 6. Patients with a history of comorbidities that interfere with wound healing (cancers, congestive heart failure, end-stage renal disease, and liver failure). 7. Presence of clinical signs of active infection unresponsive to oral antibiotics (oedema, erythema, discharge, regional lymph node enlargement, pain, or fever). 8. Patients who take medications that interfere with wound healing (glucocorticoids, immunosuppressive and cytotoxic drugs) at the time of inclusion. 9. Non-diabetic patients with foot wounds due to vascular or dermatological reasons.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound Healing size3 monthsulcer length, width, and depth in Cm

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effect on Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) level3 monthswill be used by ELISA Kit
Occurrence of infection3 monthsany symptoms of infection Include (Redness, Edema and pain at the site of infection)
Treatment-related side effects.3 monthsby asking the patient by phone call

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026