Skip to content

Enhancing Parent/Caregiver Engagement in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU): A PICU Journal

Enhancing Parent/Caregiver Engagement in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU): A Pilot Study of a PICU Journal Intervention

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06117345
Acronym
PICUJournal
Enrollment
75
Registered
2023-11-07
Start date
2024-05-15
Completion date
2027-11-15
Last updated
2026-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness

Keywords

Critical care, Intensive care, Pediatrics, Family-Centered Care, Family Engagement, PICU Liberation

Brief summary

Admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is well-recognized to be extremely distressing and stressful for the patient and family. As medical research and technology have advanced more and more children in the PICU are surviving, however in turn incurring new and persistent impairments across physical, cognitive, emotional, and social domains of health. This phenomenon is often referred to as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). These impairments not only impact the patient but parents have also been found to have poor emotional health outcomes following discharge from the PICU. Consistently, parents/caregivers of children admitted to the PICU report their primary concerns to be 1) the overwhelming physical environment of the PICU, 2) uncertainty about the child's survivorship and outcomes, 3) relationships and communication with staff, and 4) feeling helpless. Additionally, research has shown that caregiver-perceived stress during the child's hospitalization positively predicts post-traumatic stress three months after discharge for parents/caregivers (Nelson et al., 2019), which may translate into higher risk and duration of post-traumatic stress in their children. Therefore, providing an in-hospital outlet such as a "PICU Journal" for patients and families to express their subjective experiences may help bridge the gap between perception and reality as a means of buffering against post-traumatic responses. Conceptually, a semi-structured journal intervention may integrate the therapeutic aspects of journaling while also providing pertinent information and serving as an advocacy and communication tool. Prior research has demonstrated the use of a "PICU Journal" is feasible for implementation and has been well-received by families of children in the PICU (Herrup et al., 2019). Therefore, the aims of this mixed-method study are to 1) examine the relationship between this journaling intervention and the perceived stress, care engagement, symptoms of anxiety, and depression, and the development of PICS in parents of children hospitalized in the PICU, and 2) examine the relationship between parent participation in this intervention and the development of PICS-p in children, and 3) assess the feasibility of this intervention from key stakeholders.

Detailed description

Eligible participants will be identified by their primary Certified Child Life Specialist (CCLS) using the daily PICU census and electronic medical record. All eligible participants will first be approached by the child life specialist on their care team to provide brief information about the study and refer to the key study personnel (KSP) if the parent/caregiver is interested in learning more. If they are potentially interested in participating, a member of the KSP (comprised of a doctoral level CCLS, psychology graduate students, PICU physician, and research nurses) will approach the parent/caregiver at bedside and give information and obtain consent. When approaching for consent, the KSP will first obtain approval to approach from the patient's bedside nurse to ensure it is a feasible and appropriate time to do so. All parents/caregivers who indicate interest will be approached to participate to ensure a diverse and broad sample, until a total of 75 parents/caregivers have completed participation in the study. No randomization will be used. Once consent has been given by the parent/caregiver (using an electronic consent form housed in REDCap), they will complete a short demographic survey in REDCap. The family will then be given the PICU Journal along with supplies and instructions on how to access additional pages and the photo printer. The PICU Journal was developed by conducting extensive research on perceived stressors in the PICU, post-intensive care syndrome in pediatrics and their families, and the use of dairies in the intensive care unit setting, along with consultation from Certified Child Life Specialists, and with input from family advisors. Families will be able to take the original journal home with them. Data will be collected at three-time points: time one (T1) between 24 and 72 hours of the child's admission, time two (T2), peri-discharge, and time three (T3) three months post-discharge. Timepoint 1 (T1) Between 24 - 72 hours after admission: Parent Participation Consent Form Illness Severity (Chart Review) Child Demographics (Chart Review) Parent Demographics Survey Abbreviated Parental Stressor Scale: Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (APSS: PICU) Caregiving Health Engagement Scale (CHE-s) Timepoint 2 (T2) Peri-discharge Abbreviated Parental Stressor Scale: Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (A-PSS: PICU) Caregiving Health Engagement Scale (CHE-s) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Journal Use & Satisfaction Survey Timepoint 3 (T3) 3 months post-discharge: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R) At Home Journal Use & Satisfaction Survey Child Participation Assent Form (Child Report) Child Revised Impact of Events Scale (CRIES-8) (Child Report) \*Semi-Structured Interview (Parents) At the conclusion of the study : Provider Satisfaction Survey

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPICU Journal

A hard-copy, customizable educational/therapeutic/expressive journal for parents/caregivers to seek information and document their child's PICU experiences and outcomes.

Sponsors

Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
Vanderbilt University
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Parent/Caregiver Inclusion Criteria: * The participant is a primary caregiver of a pediatric patient (ages 1 month to 21 years) admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) at Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt (MCJCHV) * The participant's child meets the criteria for Levels 1 or 2 of the Early Mobility Protocol at MCJCHV * The participant's child has been hospitalized in the PICU for between 24 and 72 hours at the time of informed consent. * The participant has not had prior experience with their child(ren) being admitted to the PICU. * The participant is proficient in reading and writing the English language. Parent/Caregiver

Exclusion criteria

* The participant is unwilling to provide consent. * The participant is unable to read and write in the English language. Child Inclusion Criteria: * The child participant is between the ages of 8 to 17 years. * The participant is proficient in reading and writing the English language. Child

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Parent/Caregiver reported stress levelAt study enrollment (T1), within 48 hours of child's discharge from hospital (T2)Score on the Abbreviated Parental Stressor Scale: Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; 7 Likert type items scored from 1 to 5, with 1 being "not stressful" and 5 being "extremely stressful." Composite scores can range from 0 (not experienced) to 35 (extremely stressful).
Parent/Caregiver care engagement levelAt study enrollment (T1), within 48 hours of child's discharge from hospital (T2)Score on the Caregiving Health Engagement Scale; 7 items with four answer choices scored from 1 to 4. Composite scores can range from 7 (minimal engagement) to 28 (high engagement).
Parent/Caregiver reported depression and anxiety symptomswithin 48 hours of child's discharge from hospital (T2), at 3 months post-discharge (T3)Score on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; two subscales (anxiety and depression) with 7 items each. Items have 4 answer choices scored from 1 to 4, with higher numbers indicating higher alignment with anxiety or depression. Cut scores are used to determine clinical significance; a total score of less than 7 on a subscale indicates a non-case, 8-10 on a subscale indicates mild, 11-14 indicates moderate, and 15 to 21 is considered severe.
Parent/caregiver reported impact of eventsat 3 months post-discharge (T3)Score on Impact of Events Scale-Revised; 20 Likert-type items scored from 0 (not experienced) to 4 (extremely distressed). Total composite scores can range from 0 (not experienced) to 80 (extremely distressed).
Parent/Caregiver use of and satisfaction with PICU journalwithin 48 hours of child's discharge from hospital (T2), at 3 months post-discharge (T3)Responses to a descriptive survey created by research team to assess frequency/type of PICU journal use and completion, as well as parent/caregiver perceptions of feasibility and utility
Child reported impact of eventsat 3 months post-discharge (T3)Score on the Child Revised Impact of Events Scale; 8 items with four answer choices scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (often). Total composite scores can range from 0 (not at all distressed) t to 24 (extremely distressed).
Parent/caregiver Experiences Interviewat 3 months post-discharge (T3)Responses to semi-structured interview about PICU journal perceptions and experiences (in-person, by phone, or by teleconference)
PICU Staff perceptions of PICU journal interventionThrough study completion, an expected average of 2 yearsResponses to a descriptive survey created by research team to collect perceptions about and level of engagement with PICU journal intervention

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKristina Betters, MD

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 10, 2026