Skip to content

The Use of Portable Wireless Monitor in Patient Vital Sign Monitoring

The Use of Portable Wireless Monitor in Patient Vital Sign Monitoring

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06117111
Enrollment
30
Registered
2023-11-03
Start date
2023-12-20
Completion date
2024-12-20
Last updated
2025-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vital Signs

Keywords

vital signs, intraoperative monitoring

Brief summary

This clinical investigation assesses the performance of PaMo patient monitor system (PaMo) and its wearable sensing devices that combines continuous IP, ECG and PPG in detecting developing respiratory depression episodes. PaMo patient monitor system consists of a wearable measurement unit worn on a patient, bedside mobile unit that receives the data from the wearable unit through Bluetooth Low Energy connection, visualises it, and can be relayed further to the central unit through WiFi network.

Detailed description

Monitoring of voluntary subjects undergoing major surgery requiring postoperative intensive care treatment with PaMo patient monitoring device that includes continuous ECG, respiration and PPG monitoring. The monitoring device is connected during anaesthesia preparation before induction of general anaesthesia and monitoring is continued throughout the surgery and in the intensive care unit (ICU) for total of 24 hours. For reference data, GE Carescape B850 patient monitors are used continuously for oxygen saturation, ECG and respiration signals. The data are collected from the reference patient monitor using a S/5 collect software and a study computer. In addition, to obtain a gold standard reference for SpO2 with blood gas analyzer arterial samples are taken every two hours during anesthesia and in the ICU concurrently with the routine checkups. During the surgery, an arterial cannula collects continuous blood pressure data and can be used for taking blood samples. The data collected with PaMo device and reference monitor are analyzed in Tampere University by researchers and used in device, software and algorithm development. User experience information and usability feedback are collected at the end of the study from the medical staff with an interview form. The study does not include a control group. All subjects are using the devices in similar way and the parameters collected from the same individual using two different methods are compared.

Interventions

DEVICEPaMo monitoring device

Comparison of the device to standard monitoring

Sponsors

Tampere University
CollaboratorOTHER
Tampere University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age: minimum of 18 years * Undergoing pancreatic or ENT tumour surgery * Ability to give informed consent * Volunteering to the study

Exclusion criteria

* Age under 18 years * Insufficient knowledge in Finnish * Cardiac pacemaker * Inability to give informed consent * Denial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Electrocardiography (ECG)Continuous measurement 24 hoursMean error an mean absolute error between the study device and standard monitor heart rae
PlethysmographyContinuous measurement 24 hoursMean error and mean absolute error between the study monitor and standard monitor
Respiration rateContinuous measurement 24 hoursMean error and mean absolute error between the study monitor and standard monitor

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
usabilityContinuous measurement 24 hoursusability of the evaluated patient monitoring solution for showing its usability, understandable user interface, suitability of the materials, unobtrusiveness, and fulfilment of related design input requirements. Questionnaire results
blood pressureContinuous measurement 24 hoursblood pressure Mean error and mean absolute error between the study monitor and standard monitor and algorithm development

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026