Skip to content

Effects of Virtual Reality on Rehabilitation in Patients With Heart Failure

Effects of VIRTUal reALity on Rehabilitation in Patients With Heart Failure: a Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06115928
Acronym
VIRTUAL-HF
Enrollment
80
Registered
2023-11-03
Start date
2023-12-01
Completion date
2024-11-30
Last updated
2023-11-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure, Reduced Ejection Fraction

Keywords

heart failure, cardiac rehabilitation, virtual reality, treatment adherence and compliance, randomized controlled trial

Brief summary

Background. To improve symptoms and reduce poor outcomes related to heart failure (HF), international guidelines recommend cardiac rehabilitation (CR), particularly for those with a reduced ejection fraction. Unfortunately, patient adherence to rehabilitation programs remains suboptimal, with dropouts ranging from 15.4 to 63.3%. An innovative and promising intervention that could improve adherence to rehabilitation is virtual reality (VR). This study aims to evaluate the effects of VR in patients with HF undergoing CR in terms of adherence (primary outcome), functional capacity, perceived exertion, angina, quality of life, heart rate, oxygen saturation, blood pressure, maximum oxygen uptake, minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope, oxygen pulse, blood values of NT-proBNP and rehospitalization rates due to HF (secondary outcomes). Methods. A randomized controlled trial will be conducted in a sample of 80 patients referred to CR. Participants will be enrolled in a cardiological rehabilitation unit of a large university hospital in Italy and randomized (1:1) to the experimental intervention consisting of CR performed with high-quality immersive VR with PICO 4® Head Mounted Display headset and TREADMILL XR® software (Arm 1) or standard CR (Arm 2). Patients will receive 30-minute CR sessions twice a week for one month. Results. Significant improvements in primary and secondary outcomes are expected in patients in the intervention group. Conclusions. If proven to be effective, VR could be an innovative, safe, and easy digital health intervention to improve adherence to CR in patients with HF, as well as important clinical outcomes.

Interventions

DEVICEVirtual reality

Participants will perform cardiac rehabilitation with hardware-type technology consisting of a PICO 4® head mounted display (HMD) headset and the software TREADMILL XR®.

Sponsors

Valentina Micheluzzi
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age over 18 years; * clinically stable chronic HF diagnosis with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 40%

Exclusion criteria

* conditions that exclude exercise training (e.g., bone fractures); * conditions that exclude VR use of VR (e.g., blindness and deafness * severe cognitive impairment, documented with a score of 0 - 4 on the Six-item Screener; * end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis; * ascertained advanced pneumopathies; * active neoplasms; * rheumatic diseases.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
adherence to cardiac rehabilitationafter 4 weeksadherence to cardiac rehabilitation measured as the number of sessions performed, compared to the scheduled sessions expressed as a percentage

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perceived exertionat baseline, after 4 and 8 weekswith Borg rating of perceived exertion which captures physical activity intensity levels related to heart rate during exercise. The rate is multiplied by 10 to determine the ideal heart rate during aerobic exercise. The Borg scale score ranges from 6 to 20 corresponding to no effort and maximum effort, respectively, equating a minimum of 20% to a max of 100% effort.
Anginaat baseline, after 4 and 8 weekswith Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) grading of angina.The CCS classification system employs four grades ranging from I (no physical activity limitation) to IV (inability to perform any physical activity without discomfort).
heart rateat baseline, after 4 and 8 weeksdigital monitor
blood pressureat baseline, after 4 and 8 weeksdigital monitor
oxygen saturationat baseline, after 4 and 8 weeksdigital monitor
Functional capacityat baseline, after 4 and 8 weeksfunctional capacity in meters with the six minutes walking test
Minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production slopeat baseline and after 8 weeksCPET parameters
oxygen pulseat baseline and after 8 weeksCPET parameters
NT-probnpat baseline and after 8 weeksblood values
HF-related rehospitalizationafter 8 weeks from the stard of the studynumber of rehopedalization related to heart failure
Quality of life of patients with heart failureat baseline, after 4 and 8 weekswith Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) which consists of 23 items to assess physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and quality of life of patients. KCCQ scores range from 0 to 100 and the scores represent health status as follows: from 0 to 24, very poor to poor; 25 to 49, poor to fair; 50 to 74, fair to good; and 75 to 100, good to excellent.
Maximal oxygen uptakeat baseline and after 8 weeksCPET parameters

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026