Skip to content

Gluteal Musculature Activation to Improve Ankle Stability

Gluteal Musculature Activation to Improve Ankle Stability: a Cross-sectional Observational Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06114654
Acronym
TOBEMG
Enrollment
30
Registered
2023-11-02
Start date
2022-01-01
Completion date
2023-09-30
Last updated
2023-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ankle Disease, Muscle Weakness

Keywords

biomechanics, electromyography, ankle stability, gluteal musculature

Brief summary

The goal of this observational study is to to evaluate and correlate muscle activation in the gluteal musculature and ankle stability in a healthy population. The main question it aims to answer is: Is there a significant positive correlation between gluteal muscle activation and ankle stability? Participants will complete questionnaires on the functionality of foot and ankle pathologies related to their daily life and sports activities, and perform specific physical tests to assess muscle strength, ankle stability, and activation of the lower extremity musculature.

Detailed description

The main outcomes were the muscle activation (gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, tibialis anterior, and peroneus longus) of both limbs during a Single Leg Stance test and a Hurdle Step test (Check Your Motion, Albacete, Spain). Muscle activation was assessed using surface electromyography, and the results will be described as a percentage of Maximum Isometric Voluntary Contraction (%MVIC). Ankle stability was evaluated according to the criteria established by Perrot using a force platform (Dynamic Walkway P6000, BTS Bioengineering, Milan, Italy). There are no previous studies evaluating a possible correlation between gluteus maximus muscle activity and ankle stabilization capacity. Therefore, a sample size calculation was performed with the aim of detecting a strong correlation as statistically significant (r=0.5) according to the criteria of Hopkins et al \[33\]. The G\*Power 3.1 program was used to calculate the sample size. The statistical test used was Correlation: Bivariate Normal Model, the type of power analysis was A priori: compute required sample size - given alpha, power and effect size. An error α=0.05 and a statistical power of 0.80 (β=0.20) was used. The result of the test was 29 subjects required to perform this research. The study investigators will sign a data confidentiality sheet where they commit to use the data with appropriate confidentiality. In addition, after analyzing the results, the participant's face will be hidden so that he/she cannot be recognized. The data will be collected on a form designed for this purpose and will be entered into a database created with the Microsoft Office Excel® 2021 program, in a URV system subject to the security measures of the National Security Scheme, always in areas where only the research staff of this project can access. Subsequently, the SPSS program (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 26.0 for Windows® will be used to analyze the data. The normality of all variables will be examined using the Saphiro Wilk statistical test. Descriptive statistics for all variables will be expressed as mean (standard deviation) if the variable follows a normal distribution and as median (interquartile range) if the variable does not follow a normal distribution. Subsequently, correlation analysis will be performed using Pearson's correlation test (if both variables are normal) or Spearman's Rho (if either variable does not follow a normal distribution). Correlations will be classified as weak (r=0.1), moderate (r=0.3), strong (r=0.5), large (r=0.7) or very large (r=0.9) \[33\]. Correlations will be described as statistically significant if the p-value is less than 0.05. If the correlation coefficient is statistically significant, the coefficient of determination (R2) will be calculated. Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons will be applied based on the correlations finally evaluated.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPhysical Therapy

Specific physical tests to assess muscle strength, ankle stability and activation of the lower extremity musculature: Single Leg Stance Test, Hurdle Step test and Single leg vertical jump.

Sponsors

University Rovira i Virgili
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* To be between 18 and 35 years of age. * To sign the informed consent form. * Failure to meet the

Exclusion criteria

.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Muscle activation (%MVIC)1 yearThis was measured with wireless electromyography sensors electromiografía (BTS FreeEMG 1000, BTS Bioengineering, Milan, Italy).
Ankle stability1 yearThis was measured with force platform (Dynamic Walkway P6000, BTS Bioengineering, Milan, Italy).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Height1 yearCentimeters
Body weight1 yearKilograms
Aye1 yearYears
Maximum isometric muscle strength1 yearThis was measured with a force gauge, Chronojump Boscosystem
Ankle functionality1 yearThis was measured with a Foot and Ankle Ability Measures questionnaire. It consists of 9 items, each item has a certain score and the sum of these should give a result between 0 and 30 points. If the result is ≤ 27 points, it indicates ankle instability.
Gender1 yearFemale or male

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026