Skip to content

TACE Using Idarubicin Versus Doxorubicin Chemoemulsion in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Transarterial Chemoembolization Using Idarubicin Versus Doxorubicin Chemoemulsion in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma (IDADOX)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06114082
Acronym
IDADOX
Enrollment
128
Registered
2023-11-02
Start date
2023-07-28
Completion date
2026-07-01
Last updated
2026-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Liver Cancer

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma, Transarterial chemoembolization, Doxorubicin, Idarubicin

Brief summary

Little is known about whether the types of chemotherapeutic agents affect the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Although doxorubicin is the most commonly-used chemotherapeutic agent in the world, idarubicin is recently in the spotlight after promising results of the in vitro and prospective single-arm studies. On the other hand, there are many reports showing that the type of chemotherapeutic agents does not significantly alter the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization. This is a randomized-controlled trial to show the non-inferiority of idarubicin compared to doxorubicin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who receive transarterial chemoembolization as the first-line treatment.

Detailed description

Eligible patients will be randomly allocated either in the IDA-cTACE or DOX-cTACE group, and the randomization can be stratified by Child-Pugh class. Each patient will be treated by conventional chemoembolization using a microcatheter and chemoemulsion. For the chemoemulsion preparation method, 10 mg of idarubicin powder (IDA-cTACE) or 50 mg of doxorubicin powder (DOX-cTACE) will be dissolved by 2.5 mL of iodinated contrast media, and then mixed with 10 mL of iodized poppy seed oil (Lipiodol; Lipiodol Ultrafluid, Guerbet, France). The amount of chemoemulsion administered to each patient will be determined by an operator regarding tumor size, vascularity, etc. Additional embolization will be performed using calibrated gelatin sponge particles usually 100-350 µm until the arterial flow is almost stopped. Afterwards, Patients will be evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months after the initial treatment, but the follow-up can be individualized at the discretion of hepatologists or hepatic surgeons blinded to the treatment allocation. In cases of residual or recurred tumor, additional treatments will be determined by the blinded hepatologists or hepatic surgeons. Once a patient with residual or recurred tumor receives repetitive TACE, the same drug (idarubicin or doxorubicin) used at the initial TACE will be used for re-treatments.

Interventions

PROCEDUREIDA-TACE

Stable chemoemulsion will be produced by dissolving 10 mg of idarubicin powder (Zavedos; Pfizer, New York, NY, USA) in 2.5 mL of an iodinated contrast agent. This solution will then be mixed with 10 mL of iodized oil (Lipiodol Ultrafluid; Guerbet, Villepinte, France) using a three-way stopcock. This chemoemulsion will be prepared in aliquots (0.8 mL of chemoemulsion in each 1 mL syringe) and injected until the embolization endpoint is achieved.

PROCEDUREDOX-TACE

Stable chemoemulsion will be produced by dissolving 50 mg of doxorubicin powder (Adriamycin RDF; Ildong Pharmaceutical, Seoul, Republic of Korea) in 2.5 mL of an iodinated contrast agent. This solution will then be mixed with 10 mL of iodized oil (Lipiodol Ultrafluid; Guerbet, Villepinte, France) using a three-way stopcock. This chemoemulsion will be prepared in aliquots (0.8 mL of chemoemulsion in each 1 mL syringe) and injected until the embolization endpoint is achieved.

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
Guerbet
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adults aged 19 or above. 2. Patients diagnosed with HCC either histologically and/or radiologically (LI-RADS 4 or 5). 3. Patients with five or fewer tumors. 4. Patients in which the largest tumor is 5 cm or less in diameter. 5. Patients with no prior treatment experience for HCC. 6. Patients categorized as Child-Pugh class A or B. 7. Patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or below. 8. Patients without severe functional abnormalities of major organs: the following results from a blood test conducted within a month prior to the procedure must be satisfied: * WBC count ≤ 12,000 / mm3 * Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500 /mm3 * Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL * Total bilirubin ≤ 3.0 mg/dL * eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 * Patients deemed clinically most suitable to receive TACE through hepatologist, hepatic surgeon, or multidisciplinary consultation: patients for whom other treatments such as liver transplantation/surgery/ablation are realistically impossible or, even if technically possible, do not have significant clinical benefits compared to TACE. * Patients who have understood sufficiently about this clinical trial and have given written consent to participate. * Fertile women capable of effective contraception for at least 6.5 months after TACE, and men with fertile female partners capable of effective contraception for at least 3.5 months after TACE.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with HCC involving the portal vein or hepatic vein. 2. Patients with extrahepatic spread of HCC 3. Patients diagnosed with a cancer other than HCC within 2 years of enrollment. 4. Patients who have undergone a biliary-intestinal anastomosis. 5. Patients for whom the use of idarubicin or doxorubicin is contraindicated (including severe heart failure, arrhythmia, hypersensitivity to anthracycline chemotherapy, pregnant or nursing women, etc.).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective response rate (ORR)From the initial TACE to the end of the 6-month follow-up or commencement of subsequent anticancer treatment, whichever comes firstthe number of patients with partial or complete response as the best overall response divided by the total number of participants in the analysis population

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
3-month tumor response by LI-RADS tumor response criteriaFrom the initial TACE to the end of the 3-month follow-up or commencement of subsequent anticancer treatment, whichever comes first
3-month tumor response by localized mRECISTFrom the initial TACE to the end of the 3-month follow-up or commencement of subsequent anticancer treatment, whichever comes first
3-month tumor response by mRECISTFrom the initial TACE to the end of the 3-month follow-up or commencement of subsequent anticancer treatment, whichever comes first
6-month tumor response by LI-RADS tumor response criteriaFrom the initial TACE to the end of the 6-month follow-up or commencement of subsequent anticancer treatment, whichever comes first
6-month tumor response by localized mRECISTFrom the initial TACE to the end of the 6-month follow-up or commencement of subsequent anticancer treatment, whichever comes first
6-month tumor response by mRECISTFrom the initial TACE to the end of the 6-month follow-up or commencement of subsequent anticancer treatment, whichever comes first
Time-to-progressionFrom the date of randomization to tumor progression or study termination (6 months after the last patient is treated), whichever comes firstTime interval between the first TACE to tumor progression by mRECIST
Adverse event30 daysCommon Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0
Treatment-related serious adverse event30 daysCommon Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJin Woo Choi, MD, PhD

Seoul National University Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 21, 2026