Skip to content

Prosthetic Management of All on Four Versus All on Six to Rehabilitate Completely Edentulous Maxillary Ridge Opposed by Natural Teeth

Prosthetic Management of All on Four Versus All on Six to Rehabilitate Completely Edentulous Maxillary Ridge Opposed by Natural Teeth

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06114069
Enrollment
20
Registered
2023-11-02
Start date
2022-05-10
Completion date
2024-08-14
Last updated
2024-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prosthesis Survival

Brief summary

the aim of the study to compare the anterior maxillary bone index changes for patient rehabilitated with implant supported fixed prosthesis opposed by natural teeth

Interventions

PROCEDUREimplant supported maxillary fixed prosthesis

Maxillary fixed prosthesis according to all on four or all on six concept

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

The patients were classified into 2 groups: 1. Group I; 4 patients received 4-implant supported fixed prosthesis. 2. Group II; 4 patients received 6-implant supported fixed prosthesis.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 1\. All patient wearing a maxillary implant supported overdenture or implant supported fixed restoration and mandibular natural teeth or fixed restoration within natural dentition. 2\. All patients were unsatisfied by the maxillary restoration and presented clear preference for a better prosthesis. 3\. They were healthy, free from any systemic diseases relating to bone resorption such as uncontrolled diabetics or osteoporosis. This was achieved through medical history and clinical examination by physician. 4\. At least one year passed after the last restoration. 5. At least 15 mm restorative space must be available (from the mucosa covering the crest of the residual ridge to proposed occlusal plane) to permit construction of all types of tested prosthesis (class I according to Ahuja and Cagna).195 This was detected by a tentative jaw relation.

Exclusion criteria

* 1\. Patients had head and neck radiotherapy, patients with bleeding disorders or hepatic patients. 2\. Patients with metabolic disorders as diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis and hepatic disorders which might affect implant lifespan. 3\. Long term immunosuppress and corticosteroid drug therapy. 4. Patient with abnormal habits as clenching and bruxism. 5. Smoking patient. 6. Uncooperative patients. 7. Neuromuscular diseases. 8. Patient with problems in TMJ.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
anterior area indexsix monthsoutcome is being evaluated by radiograph

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026