Skip to content

CPAP Therapy Through a Helmet or a Full Face Mask in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Cross-over Study

CPAP Therapy Through a Helmet or a Full Face Mask in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: a Comparative, Cross-over, Physiological Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06113432
Enrollment
30
Registered
2023-11-02
Start date
2023-09-19
Completion date
2024-05-30
Last updated
2024-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pneumonia, Bacterial, Respiratory Failure, COVID-19 Pneumonia

Brief summary

Observational and randomized trials have demonstrated the high effectiveness of non-invasive helmet ventilatory support, demonstrating a reduction in intubation rate mortality compared with high-flow and standard oxygen therapy. Some pilot physiological studies have shown physiological benefits of helmets compared to the oronasal mask for non-invasive ventilation. The purpose of the study is to compare markers of patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI), patient's comfort, work of breathing, gas exchange, and hemodynamics in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) during non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in continuous positive pressure (CPAP) mode during an oronasal mask ventilation or a combination of a helmet with high-flow oxygenation as an air flow generator.

Detailed description

In December 2019, an outbreak of a novel coronavirus emerged in Wuhan, China and rapidly spread worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak a pandemic on March 11th, 2020. The clinical disease (COVID-19) results in critical illness in about 5% of patients with predominant acute respiratory failure. Observational and randomized trials have demonstrated the high effectiveness of non-invasive helmet ventilatory support, demonstrating a reduction in intubation rate mortality compared with high-flow and standard oxygen therapy. Some pilot physiological studies have shown physiological benefits of helmets compared to the oronasal mask for non-invasive ventilation. The purpose of the study is to compare markers of patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI) (measuring esophageal pressure, transpulmonary pressure during inspiration and expiration), the patient's work of breathing (assessment of accessory muscles work) patient's comfort by visual-analog scale, gas exchange (by PaO2/FiO2 and Respiration Oxygenation Index (ROX-index), and hemodynamics in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) during non-invasive pulmonary ventilation (NIV) in continuous positive pressure (CPAP) mode during an oronasal mask ventilation or a combination of a helmet with high-flow oxygenation as an air flow generator.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTArterial blood gases

Measurement of arterial oxygen and tension and arterial dioxide tension, calculation of arterial partial oxygen tension to inspiratory oxygen fraction (PaO2/FiO2) ratio

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTRespiratory rate (RR)

Measurement of respiratory rate by waveform analysis using a ventilator

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTPulseoximeter

Peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) measurement and the ROX-index calculation (SpO2/FiO2/RR)

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTAssessment of accessory respiratory muscles work

Patrick score calculation. Score: 0. No visible tonic or phasic use of neck muscles. 1. Neck muscles taut but with no respiratory modulation (i.e., tonic activity). 2. Mild respiratory modulation in neck muscle contraction. 3. Moderate phasic activity (no supraclavicular or intercostal indrawing). 4. Vigorous phasic activity with indrawing. 5. Vigorous phasic activity with abdominal paradox.

Esophageal pressure measurement on inspiration and expiration with calculation of delta esophageal pressure, transpulmonary pressure and delta transpulmonary pressure

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTDiscomfort Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

From 1 to 10 points, where 1 point - maximal discomfort, 10 points - minimal discomfort.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTNoninvasive blood pressure

Noninvasive blood pressure

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTHeart rate

Heart rate calculation using electrocardiogram monitoring

Sponsors

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Enrolled patients will receive all types of respiratory support (helmet CPAP 40 minutes followed by full face mask CPAP 40 minutes or full face mask CPAP 40 minutes followed by helmet CPAP 40 minutes) in a randomized crossover design.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to community-acquired pneumonia or COVID-19 * The ratio of the partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood to the inspiratory fraction of oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) is less than 250 mm Hg while breathing atmospheric air * Respiratory rate more than \> 25 per minute. * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who achieve the following target parameters with only low-flow oxygen therapy (flow up to 15 l/min): SpO2 \> 93%, the patient does not have a subjective feeling of fatigue, there is no visible work of the auxiliary respiratory muscles of the neck, * Unstable hemodynamics (systolic blood pressure \<90 mm Hg or mean arterial pressure \<65 mm Hg) and/or lactic acidosis (lactate \>5 mmol/l and/or clinically diagnosed shock) and/or life-threatening arrhythmia, * Metabolic acidosis (pH \<7.30); * Patients who were in the ICU for less than 24 hours for any reason * Primary or secondary lung diseases (exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchial asthma, interstitial lung diseases, metastatic lung disease) * Cardiogenic pulmonary edema, * Chronic diseases in the stag e of decompensation with the development of extrapulmonary organ dysfunction (liver cirrhosis, progression of cancer, CHF), * Glasgow Coma Scale score \<14 points, * Swallowing disorders * Hypercapnia (PaCO2\>45 mmHg), * The need for urgent tracheal intubation for any reason, * Recent head surgery or anatomy that prevents the placement of a helmet or full face mask on the patient, * Pregnancy, * Inability to cooperate with staff

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Inspiratory effort40 minutesDelta esophageal pressure
Inspiratory delta transpulmonary pressure (stress)40 minutesInspiratory delta transpulmonary pressure
Expiratory delta transpulmonary pressure40 minutesExpiratory delta transpulmonary pressure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patrick's score40 minutesPatrick's score measurement, minimum 1point, maximum 5 points, higher score means worse outcome. Score: 0. No visible tonic or phasic use of neck muscles. 1. Neck muscles taut but with no respiratory modulation (i.e., tonic activity). 2. Mild respiratory modulation in neck muscle contraction. 3. Moderate phasic activity (no supraclavicular or intercostal indrawing). 4. Vigorous phasic activity with indrawing. 5. Vigorous phasic activity with abdominal paradox.
Discomfort visual analog scale (VAS)40 minutesDiscomfort VAS score calculation, minimum 1point, maximum 10 points, higher score means better outcome
Oxygenation40 minutesPaO2/FiO2 calculation
Heart rate40 minutesHeart rate calculation using electrocardiogram monitoring
Noninvasive blood pressure40 minutesNoninvasive blood pressure
Respiratory rate40 minutesMeasurement of respiratory rate by waveform analysis using a ventilator
ROX index40 minutesPeripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) measurement and the ROX-index calculation (SpO2/FiO2/RR)

Countries

Russia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026