Acute Pancreatitis, Cholelithiasis
Conditions
Keywords
cholecystectomy, Acute Pancreatitis, Cholelithiasis
Brief summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare outcomes for interval or early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with moderately severe and severe pancreatitis. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are: * To establish whether there is a difference in surgical outcomes comparing patients diagnosed with severe or moderately severe pancreatitis on which early cholecystectomy was performed versus performing interval cholecystectomy. * The primary endpoint will be to evaluate major complications, defined as a Clavien-Dindo score greater than or equal to III/V. * Secondary endpoints include evaluating minor complications (defined as a Clavien-Dindo score below III/V), biliary disease recurrence, mortality, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative admittance into an intensive care unit. Participants will be randomly assigned to either group: early cholecystectomy during the pancreatitis hospitalization or interval cholecystectomy scheduled 4 weeks after clinical resolution of pancreatitis.
Detailed description
CHISPA is a randomized controlled, parallel-group, superiority clinical trial. An intention- to-treat analysis will be performed. It seeks to evaluate differences between patients taken to early cholecystectomy during hospital admission (72 hours after randomization) versus delayed cholecystectomy (30 +/- 5 days after randomization). Primary endpoint is major complications associated to laparoscopic cholecystectomy defined as a Clavien-Dindo score of over III/V during the first 90 days after the procedure. Secondary endpoints include recurrence of biliary disease, mortality, minor complications (Clavien-Dindo score below III/V), days of postoperative hospital stay, and days admitted in an intensive care unit postoperatively.
Interventions
PROCEDURELaparoscopic cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be performed using the standard American 4-port technique, insufflation will be achieved using CO2 to 15mmHg of pressure. Calot's triangle will be dissected until the critical view of safety is reached, being careful to dissect above the R4U line. After reaching the critical view of safety, two proximal and one distal clip will be placed on both the cystic conduct and artery separately, cutting the clips and then dissecting the gallbladder in a cystfundic direction. When the critical view of safety is not reached, the surgeon may perform a fundus-first cholecystectomy, subtotal cholecystectomy, conversion to open procedure, intraoperative cholangiography or cholecystostomy to their own discretion. It will also be the surgeon's criteria to employ or not a drain system in the surgical site. The decision for theses interventions will be taken intraoperatively and will be according to findings during the procedure.
Sponsors
Universidad del Rosario
Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
CHISPA is a randomized controlled, parallel-group, superiority clinical trial. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (within 72 hours after randomization) or interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy (30 +/- 5 days after randomization).
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Age ≥18 years, diagnosis of pancreatitis according to Atlanta guidelines, moderately severe or severe pancreatitis (APACHE score ≥8 on admittance) * Biliary pancreatitis diagnosed on imaging (be it ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and/or tomography) * Recovery of pancreatitis by tolerance of oral intake (defined as 24 hours of food consumption of any consistency without emetic episodes and pain defined as 4/10 on the visual analogue score of pain) and written informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnancy * History of cholecystectomy * Planned open cholecystectomy * Pancreatitis-associated complication before laparoscopic cholecystectomy (compartment syndrome, bleeding and/or need for peripancreatic collection drainage) * Chronic pancreatitis, * More than one episode of pancreatitis * Active malignant disease * Septic shock * Choledocholithiasis not resolved by ERCP, post-ERCP perforation and post-ERCP concomitant pancreatitis.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Major complications (rates) | 90 days | Clavien-Dindo score III in patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis of biliary origin taken to early vs interval cholecystectomy |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Recurrence (rates) | 90 days | Biliary disease recurrence defined as a new admission for recurrent pancreatitis, cholecystitis, cholangitis, choledocholithiasis, need fro ERCP or biliary colic previous to the surgical procedure until 90 postoperative days after it |
| Mortality (rates) | 90 days | Determine differences in mortality between patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis of biliary origin taken to early vs interval cholecystectomy |
| Postoperative hospital stay length (days; median) | 90 days | Compare differences in postoperative hospital stay length (general) in patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis of biliary origin taken to early vs interval cholecystectomy |
| Minor complications (rates) | 90 days | Clavien-Dindo score I-II in patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis of biliary origin taken to early vs interval cholecystectomy |
| Postoperative stay length in the ICU (days; median) | 90 days | Compare differences in postoperative stay length in the ICU in patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis of biliary origin taken to early vs interval cholecystectomy |
Countries
Colombia
Contacts
Primary ContactCamilo Ramírez-Giraldo, MD
Outcome results
None listed