Patient Satisfaction , Prosthetic Complications and Clinical Outcomes of PEEK Composite Versus Titanium Zirconium

Patient Satisfaction , Prosthetic Complication and Clinical Outcomes of PEEK Composite Versus Titanium Zirconium Maxillary Fixed Full Arch Prosthetic Opposing Mandibular Distal Extension Partial Denture

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT06111391

Enrollment

Registered

2023-11-01

Start date

2022-04-15

Completion date

2023-04-02

Last updated

2023-11-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Clinical Outcomes, Patient Satisfaction, Prosthetic Complication

Brief summary

This study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction (VAS) , prosthetic outcomes and clinical outcomes of polyether ether ketone (PEEK) Versus Titanium Zirconium fixed prostheses supported by six maxillary implants and opposed by distal extension removable partial denture.

Detailed description

thirty patients were selected for this study from a previous study who have already received previous implants in the maxillary arch. The patients were divided into two groups: Group1 received maxillary titanium zirconium full arch fixed prosthesis and mandibular distal extension partial denture, Group 2 received maxillary PEEK composite full arch fixed prosthesis and mandibular distal extension partial denture Patient satisfaction was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) after one year months , Prosthetic complications were measured on the patient and implant levels after one year

Interventions

DEVICEOsstell® device (Integration Diagnostics Ltd.).

After trans-mucosal abutments were removed and the smart pegs were attached to the fixtures, resonance frequency analysis was done to assess implant stability.The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was used to quantify stability via the Osstell® device (Integration Diagnostics Ltd.).

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

58 Years to 68 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

Normal jaw relation Good oral hygiene Patient with class I or class II inter-rach space in order to have sufficient restoration space to construct FP3 prosthesis.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with TMJ disorder and heavy smokers for more than 10 cigarettes per day. Uncooperative patient. Unfavorable occlusion. Limited restoration space (less than 12 mm).

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
implant stability	12 months	After transmucosal abutments were removed and the smart pegs were attached to the fixtures, resonance frequency analysis was done to assess implant stability.The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was used to quantify stability via the Osstell® device (Integration Diagnostics Ltd.).

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 22, 2026