Skip to content

Impact of Training on the Use of Software and Digital Monitoring Tools During General Anesthesia for Intermediate/Major-risk Surgery on Morbidity and Mortality at 28 Days

Evaluation of the Impact of Training Healthcare Teams (Quality Improvement Project) in the Combined Use of AoA Carestation Software and Digital Intraoperative Monitoring Tools (State Entropy, Surgical Pleth Index and Train-of-Four) During General Anesthesia for Intermediate- or Major-risk Surgery on Patient Morbidity and Mortality at 28 Days

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06111248
Acronym
AoA QUALITY
Enrollment
1028
Registered
2023-11-01
Start date
2024-02-05
Completion date
2025-02-06
Last updated
2026-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

All Conditions Requiring Non-cardiac Surgery

Keywords

Anesthesia, Monitoring, Cardiovascular assessment, Anesthesiology Devices, Diagnostic and Monitoring Devices

Brief summary

Tools such as surgical plethysmographic index, state entropy, train-of-four monitors exist to optimize the conduct of general anesthesia in intermediate and major risk surgery as defined by the 2022 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Although these monitors are available on anesthesia machines they are still under-used by teams due to lack of training, practice and a real understanding of their usefulness (operation, expected benefits). When used in conjunction with General Electric's AoA Carestation Insight software, these tools could have a real impact on morbidity and mortality at 28 days post-op. The aim of this prospective monocentric interventional "before/after" study is to assess the impact of training and encouraging teams to use these tools.

Detailed description

Recently, complex monitoring tools (nociception by surgical plethysmographic index monitoring, curare by train-of four monitoring, depth of anesthesia by state entropy monitoring) have been developed to optimize the conduct of general anesthesia in intermediate and major risk surgery (surgery defined by the 2022 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery). In practice, these monitors optimize nociception and the depth of anesthesia, "neither too strong nor too light". These monitors are currently available on our anesthesia machines and can be used routinely. However, these monitors are under-used by teams due to lack of training, practice and real understanding of their usefulness (operation, expected benefits). Excess nociception and depth of anesthesia are correlated with more postoperative complications, but no studies have ever shown that the combined use of these monitors (surgical plethysmographic index, state entropy, train-of-four) could significantly reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients by optimizing the management of general anesthesia. Software (AoA Carestation insight, General Electric) connected to these monitors can : * automatically query the use of intraoperative monitors; * perform usage audits to monitor teams' adherence to their practices; * coach teams by encouraging them to perform anesthesia while maintaining surgical plethysmographic index (SPI), state entropy (SE) and train-of-four (TOF) values within the thresholds considered in the literature as being optimal for anesthesia (formalized expert recommendations from the SFAR (Société Francaise d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation). In a prospective monocentric interventional "before/after" study, the aim is to assess the impact of training and encouraging teams to use the AoA Carestation Insight software in conjunction with SPI, SE and TOF monitoring, on morbidity and mortality at 28 days post-op. The hypothesis is that training and encouraging teams ("quality improvement project") to use these intraoperative monitoring tools (SPI, TOF, SE) during general anesthesia for intermediate- or major-risk surgery could significantly reduce 28-day morbidity and mortality (composite criterion).

Interventions

OTHERTraining

Staff training on the use of surgical plethysmographic index (SPI) state entropy (SE) and train-of-four (TOF) intraoperative monitors and AoA software.

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective interventional monocentric before-and-after clinical study to evaluate the impact of a "quality improvement project" intervention. The intervention consists in informing, training and coaching teams on how to use the surgical plethysmographic index, state entropy and train-of-four intraoperative monitors and AoA software.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with an ASA score 2-4. * Patients due to be operated on under general anesthesia for any intermediate- or major-risk non-cardiac procedure lasting \> 60 min. * Patients affiliated to, or benefiting from, a health insurance plan.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who have indicated their refusal to participate in the study. * Patients scheduled for minor surgery. * Patients with an ASA score 1 or 5. * Patients due for outpatient surgery. * Patients due for surgery under local or locoregional anesthesia. * Impossibility of 28-day follow-up. * Patients participating in interventional research involving human subjects. * Patients in an exclusion period determined by another study. * Patients under court protection, guardianship or curatorship. * Patients for whom it is impossible to provide clear information. * Pregnant, parturient or breast-feeding patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Occurrence of death after surgery in the control groupDay 28YES/NO
Occurrence of death after surgery in the experimental groupDay 28YES/NO
Occurence of acute myocardial infarction after surgery in the control groupDay 28YES/NO
Occurence of acute myocardial infarction after surgery in the experimental groupDay 28YES/NO
Occurence of arterial or venous thrombosis after surgery in the control groupDay 28YES/NO
Occurence of arterial or venous thrombosis after surgery in the experimental groupDay 28YES/NO
Occurence of a stroke after surgery in the control groupDay 28YES/NO
Occurence of a stroke after surgery in the experimental groupDay 28YES/NO
Postoperative cardiogenic shock (requiring diuretic, epinephrine or dobutamine infusion) in the control groupDay 28YES/NO
Postoperative cardiogenic shock (requiring diuretic, epinephrine or dobutamine infusion) in the experimental groupDay 28YES/NO
Severe acute hypotension (defined as mean arterial pressure < 50 mmHg) in the control groupDay 28YES/NO
Severe acute hypotension (defined as mean arterial pressure < 50 mmHg) in the experimental groupDay 28YES/NO
Cardiac arrhythmia (de novo atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation) in the control groupDay 28YES/NO
Cardiac arrhythmia (de novo atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation) in the experimental groupDay 28YES/NO
Postoperative episodes of sepsis and infections (according to the 2001 international definitions of sepsis) in the control groupDay 28YES/NO
Post-operative respiratory complications: defined as the need for intubation and/or non-invasive ventilation in the event of respiratory failure in the control groupDay 28YES/NO
Acute kidney injury in the control group: KDIGO criteria and renal replacement therapy. Baseline serum creatinine is obtained from the preoperative blood sample;Day 28YES/NO
Acute kidney injury in the experimental group: KDIGO criteria and renal replacement therapy. Baseline serum creatinine is obtained from the preoperative blood sample;Day 28YES/NO
Surgical complications in the control group: need for re-operation for any reason and radiological intervention for abscess drainageDay 28YES/NO
Surgical complications in the experimental group: need for re-operation for any reason and radiological intervention for abscess drainageDay 28YES/NO
Unplanned admission or readmission to the intensive care unit: control groupDay 28YES/NO
Unplanned admission or readmission to the intensive care unit: experimental groupDay 28YES/NO

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of hospital stay : Control groupDay 28The length of stay in conventional hospitalization and in continuing care will be collected from the patient's record.
Length of hospital stay : Experimental groupDay 28The length of stay in conventional hospitalization and in continuing care will be collected from the patient's record.
Length of stay (hours) in the post-procedure care department : Control groupDay 28The length of stay in the post-procedure care department = discharge time - time of entry into the post-procedure care department will be recorded in hours.
Length of stay (hours) in the post-procedure care department : Experimental groupDay 28The length of stay in the post-procedure care department = discharge time - time of entry into the post-procedure care department will be recorded in hours.
Length of time in compliance with mean arterial pressure (MAP < 60 mm Hg) : Control groupDay 28The length of time in compliance with mean arterial pressure (MAP \< 60 mm Hg) measured during the intervention will be recorded on the intervention report.
Length of time in compliance with mean arterial pressure (MAP < 60 mm Hg) : Experimental groupDay 28The length of time in compliance with mean arterial pressure (MAP \< 60 mm Hg) measured during the intervention will be recorded on the intervention report.
Number of episodes of nausea/vomiting up to 12 hours after surgery: Control group12 hours post-surgeryThe cumulative number of episodes of nausea/vomiting up to 12 hours after surgery will be recorded based on the need to resort to an intravenous or oral anti-emetic up to 12 hours post-operative.
Number of episodes of nausea/vomiting up to 24 hours after surgery: Control group24 hours post-surgeryThe cumulative number of episodes of nausea/vomiting up to 24 hours after surgery will be recorded based on the need to resort to an intravenous or oral anti-emetic up to 24 hours post-operative.
Number of episodes of nausea/vomiting up to 48 hours after surgery: Control group48 hours post-surgeryThe cumulative number of episodes of nausea/vomiting up to 48 hours after surgery will be recorded based on the need to resort to an intravenous or oral anti-emetic up to 48 hours post-operative.
Number of episodes of nausea/vomiting up to 12 hours after surgery: Experimental group12 hours post-surgeryThe cumulative number of episodes of nausea/vomiting up to 12 hours after surgery will be recorded based on the need to resort to an intravenous or oral anti-emetic up to 12 hours post-operative.
Number of episodes of nausea/vomiting up to 24 hours after surgery: Experimental group24 hours post-surgeryThe cumulative number of episodes of nausea/vomiting up to 24 hours after surgery will be recorded based on the need to resort to an intravenous or oral anti-emetic up to 24 hours post-operative.
Number of episodes of nausea/vomiting up to 48 hours after surgery: Experimental group48 hours post-surgeryThe cumulative number of episodes of nausea/vomiting up to 48 hours after surgery will be recorded based on the need to resort to an intravenous or oral anti-emetic up to 48 hours post-operative.
Post-surgical pain at 6 hours as measured by the Control groupAt 6 hours post-surgeryPain intensity at rest and on mobilization will be measured on a visual analog scale (in which 0 = no pain and 10 = highest imaginable pain) every 6 hours, for up to 48 hours after surgery.
Post-surgical pain at 6 hours as measured by the Experimental groupAt 6 hours post-surgeryPain intensity at rest and on mobilization will be measured on a visual analog scale (in which 0 = no pain and 10 = highest imaginable pain) every 6 hours, for up to 48 hours after surgery.
Post-surgical pain at 12 hours as measured by the Control groupAt 12 hours post-surgeryPain intensity at rest and on mobilization will be measured on a visual analog scale (in which 0 = no pain and 10 = highest imaginable pain) every 6 hours, for up to 48 hours after surgery.
Post-surgical pain at 12 hours as measured by the Experimental groupAt 12 hours post-surgeryPain intensity at rest and on mobilization will be measured on a visual analog scale (in which 0 = no pain and 10 = highest imaginable pain) every 6 hours, for up to 48 hours after surgery.
Post-surgical pain at 18 hours as measured by the Control groupAt 18 hours post-surgeryPain intensity at rest and on mobilization will be measured on a visual analog scale (in which 0 = no pain and 10 = highest imaginable pain) every 6 hours, for up to 48 hours after surgery.
Post-surgical pain at 18 hours as measured by the Experimental groupAt 18 hours post-surgeryPain intensity at rest and on mobilization will be measured on a visual analog scale (in which 0 = no pain and 10 = highest imaginable pain) every 6 hours, for up to 48 hours after surgery.
Post-surgical pain at 24 hours as measured by the Control groupAt 24 hours post-surgeryPain intensity at rest and on mobilization will be measured on a visual analog scale (in which 0 = no pain and 10 = highest imaginable pain) every 6 hours, for up to 48 hours after surgery.
Post-surgical pain at 24 hours as measured by the Experimental groupAt 24 hours post-surgeryPain intensity at rest and on mobilization will be measured on a visual analog scale (in which 0 = no pain and 10 = highest imaginable pain) every 6 hours, for up to 48 hours after surgery.
Post-surgical pain at 30 hours as measured by the Control groupAt 30 hours post-surgeryPain intensity at rest and on mobilization will be measured on a visual analog scale (in which 0 = no pain and 10 = highest imaginable pain) every 6 hours, for up to 48 hours after surgery.
Post-surgical pain at 30 hours as measured by the Experimental groupAt 30 hours post-surgeryPain intensity at rest and on mobilization will be measured on a visual analog scale (in which 0 = no pain and 10 = highest imaginable pain) every 6 hours, for up to 48 hours after surgery.
Post-surgical pain at 36 hours as measured by the Control groupAt 36 hours post-surgeryPain intensity at rest and on mobilization will be measured on a visual analog scale (in which 0 = no pain and 10 = highest imaginable pain) every 6 hours, for up to 48 hours after surgery.
Post-surgical pain at 36 hours as measured by the Experimental groupAt 36 hours post-surgeryPain intensity at rest and on mobilization will be measured on a visual analog scale (in which 0 = no pain and 10 = highest imaginable pain) every 6 hours, for up to 48 hours after surgery.
Post-surgical pain at 42 hours as measured by the Control groupAt 42 hours post-surgeryPain intensity at rest and on mobilization will be measured on a visual analog scale (in which 0 = no pain and 10 = highest imaginable pain) every 6 hours, for up to 48 hours after surgery.
Post-surgical pain at 42 hours as measured by the Experimental groupAt 42 hours post-surgeryPain intensity at rest and on mobilization will be measured on a visual analog scale (in which 0 = no pain and 10 = highest imaginable pain) every 6 hours, for up to 48 hours after surgery.
Post-surgical pain at 48 hours as measured by the Control groupAt 48 hours post-surgeryPain intensity at rest and on mobilization will be measured on a visual analog scale (in which 0 = no pain and 10 = highest imaginable pain) every 6 hours, for up to 48 hours after surgery.
Post-surgical pain at 48 hours as measured by the Experimental groupAt 48 hours post-surgeryPain intensity at rest and on mobilization will be measured on a visual analog scale (in which 0 = no pain and 10 = highest imaginable pain) every 6 hours, for up to 48 hours after surgery.
Confusion : Control groupPostoperative Day 1The number of episodes of confusion according to the Confusion Assessment Method, criterion 4 (disorientation) will be recorded.
Confusion : Experimental groupPostoperative Day 1The number of episodes of confusion according to the Confusion Assessment Method, criterion 4 (disorientation) will be recorded.
Surgical plethysmographic index : time within the defined thresholds: Control groupDay 0 immediately after surgeryThe time during which the surgical plethysmographic index is within the defined thresholds (intraoperatively after anesthetic induction): will be collected at the end of surgery (SPI between 20 and 50)
Surgical plethysmographic index : Time within the defined thresholds: Experimental groupDay 0 immediately after surgeryThe time during which the surgical plethysmographic index is within the defined thresholds (intraoperatively after anesthetic induction): will be collected at the end of surgery (SPI between 20 and 50)
Train-of-four: Time within the defined thresholds: Control groupDay 0 immediately after surgeryThe time during which the train-of-four parameters are within their defined thresholds (intraoperatively after anesthetic induction): TOF \> 90% will be collected at the end of surgery
Train-of-four: Time within the defined thresholds: Experimental groupDay 0 immediately after surgeryThe time during which the train-of-four parameters are within their defined thresholds (intraoperatively after anesthetic induction): TOF \> 90% will be collected at the end of surgery
State entropy: time within the defined thresholds: Control groupDay 0 immediately after surgeryThe time during which state entropy is within the defined thresholds (intraoperatively after anesthetic induction) will be collected at the end of surgery (SE between 40 and 60)
State entropy: Time within the defined thresholds: Experimental groupDay 0 immediately after surgeryThe time during which state entropy is within the defined thresholds (intraoperatively after anesthetic induction) will be collected at the end of surgery (SE between 40 and 60)
Mean arterial pressure: Time within the defined thresholds: Control groupDay 0 immediately after surgeryThe time during which the mean arterial pressure is within the defined thresholds (intraoperatively after anesthetic induction) i.e. MAP \> 60 mmHg will be collected at the end of surgery
Mean arterial pressure: Time within the defined thresholds: Experimental groupDay 0 immediately after surgeryThe time during which the mean arterial pressure is within the defined thresholds (intraoperatively after anesthetic induction) i.e. MAP \> 60 mmHg will be collected at the end of surgery
Monitor use in the Control groupDay 0 immediately after surgeryMonitor use will be defined as the prevalence (in %) of patients with simultaneous placement of SE, SPI and NMT sensors for more than 90% of the total duration of general anesthesia.
Monitor use in the Experimental groupDay 0 immediately after surgeryMonitor use will be defined as the prevalence (in %) of patients with simultaneous placement of SE, SPI and NMT sensors for more than 90% of the total duration of general anesthesia.
Compliance with intraoperative therapeutic targets in the Control groupDay 0 after surgeryCompliance with intraoperative therapeutic targets will be defined as the prevalence (in %) of patients presenting the following triad: A SE between 40-60 more than 70% of the time of the maintenance phase of general anesthesia and an SPI between 20-50 more than 70% of the time of the maintenance phase of general anesthesia and TOF \> 90% at extubation. These parameters will also be assessed individually.
Compliance with intraoperative therapeutic targets in the Experimental groupDay 0 after surgeryCompliance with intraoperative therapeutic targets will be defined as the prevalence (in %) of patients presenting the following triad: A SE between 40-60 more than 70% of the time of the maintenance phase of general anesthesia and an SPI between 20-50 more than 70% of the time of the maintenance phase of general anesthesia and TOF \> 90% at extubation. These parameters will also be assessed individually.
Participation rates: state registered anesthetic nursesDay 28Participation will be defined as the presence/viewing of at least one teaching from among video (\<90% video viewing) and/or anesthesia staff (paper sign-in sheet) and/or bibliography (paper sign-in sheet) and/or in situ training (paper sign-in sheet) : The overall participation rate and participation rates per learner class will be recorded.
Participation rates: anesthesiologist-resuscitation doctorsDay 28Participation will be defined as the presence/viewing of at least one teaching from among video (\<90% video viewing) and/or anesthesia staff (paper sign-in sheet) and/or bibliography (paper sign-in sheet) and/or in situ training (paper sign-in sheet) : The overall participation rate and participation rates per learner class will be recorded.
Participation rates: internsDay 28Participation will be defined as the presence/viewing of at least one teaching from among video (\<90% video viewing) and/or anesthesia staff (paper sign-in sheet) and/or bibliography (paper sign-in sheet) and/or in situ training (paper sign-in sheet) : The overall participation rate and participation rates per learner class will be recorded.
Overall participation rates: state registered anesthetic nurses, anesthesiologist-resuscitation doctors and internsDay 28Participation will be defined as the presence/viewing of at least one teaching from among video (\<90% video viewing) and/or anesthesia staff (paper sign-in sheet) and/or bibliography (paper sign-in sheet) and/or in situ training (paper sign-in sheet) : An overall participation rate for all participants, whatever their learner class, will be recorded.
Overall satisfaction rateDay 28The overall satisfaction rate will be measured on a Likert scale in which 0 = very dissatisfied and 10 = very satisfied.

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORYann GRICOURT, Doctor

Nîmes University Hospital, France

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMikael PERIN, Doctor

Nîmes University Hospital, France

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORChristophe BOISSON, Doctor

Nîmes University Hospital, France

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORArianne Lannelongue, Doctor

Nîmes University Hospital, France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026