Skip to content

Usability of Vibro-tactile Stimulation to Treat Spasmodic Dysphonia

Usability of Laryngeal Vibro-tactile Stimulation as a Non-invasive Treatment for the Voice Disorder Spasmodic Dysphonia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06111027
Enrollment
40
Registered
2023-11-01
Start date
2023-11-21
Completion date
2024-10-31
Last updated
2026-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laryngeal Dystonia, Spasmodic Dysphonia

Keywords

in-home therapy, vibration, vibro-tactile, laryngeal dystonia

Brief summary

The general aim of the study was to provide evidence for the usability and feasibility of applying vibro-tactile stimulation (VTS) at home as a non-invasive form of neuromodulation to improve speech in people with spasmodic dysphonia (laryngeal dystonia). This work addresses a clinical need to develop alternative or auxiliary treatments for a rare voice disorder with limited treatment options.

Detailed description

Participants with either adductor or abductor-type of spasmodic dysphonia applied VTS at home for a period of 2 months. During the first four weeks they gradually increased their weekly dosage from 3 to 6 days per week. Each application per day lasted 20 minutes.

Interventions

Participants received vibro-tactile stimulation (VTS) as a non-invasive treatment option. Stimulators were a pair of light-weight encapsulated cylindrical vibrators applied to both sides of the larynx (voice box). The vibration frequency for VTS was set be to 100Hz. During VTS, participants feel a mild tingling or vibrating sensation at their larynx. They applied VTS at home over a period of 8 weeks with a daily dosage of 20 minutes. During weeks 1-4, the weekly dosage of VTS was gradually increased (week 1: 3 days/wk; week 2: 4 days/wk; week 3: 5 days/wk; week 4: 6 days/wk). During weeks 5-8, participants applied VTS on self-selected days as needed, not exceeding 6 times a week.

Sponsors

University of Minnesota
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Spasmodic Dysphonia Association
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Usability study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of spasmodic dysphonia (laryngeal dystonia) for a minimum of 6 months with documented symptom relief after Botox injection. * Diagnosis is made by a voice disorder specialist.

Exclusion criteria

* Regular intake of benzodiazepines * Cognitive impairment: score \< 27 on Mini-mental state examination * Identifies with a neurological or musculoskeletal impairment affecting speech motor function. These impairments may include a form of: Dyskinesia, Dystonia, Essential Tremor, Huntington's Disease, Multiple System Atrophy, Muscle Tension Dysphonia, Parkinsonism, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, Spasticity, Intracranial Neoplasm (brain tumor), Spinal Neoplasm, Cerebrovascular Accident (Stroke), Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Intracranial Hemorrhage, Multiple Sclerosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perceived Speech Effort (PSE) at Week 4Week 4Perceived Speech Effort was self-rated by participants on a 0-10 scale (0 = no effort, 10 = maximum effort) while reading standardized sentences at habitual pitch and loudness. Ratings were collected immediately before and after each vibro-tactile stimulation session. The PSE value reported here reflects the group mean at week 4.
Perceived Speech Effort (PSE) at Week 8Week 8Perceived Speech Effort was self-rated by participants on a 0-10 scale (0 = no effort, 10 = maximum effort) while reading standardized sentences at habitual pitch and loudness. Ratings were collected immediately before and after each vibro-tactile stimulation session. The PSE value reported here reflects the group mean at week 8.
Voice Quality Change (VQC) at Week 1Week 1Voice Quality Change (VQC) was self-assessed using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very unnoticeable, 5 = very noticeable; 3 = neutral). Ratings were recorded at the end of each VTS session. VQC at week 1 represents a baseline measure of symptom severity. It was computed as the mean of the first three sessions of VTS of the study.
Voice Quality Change (VQC) at Week 8Week 8Voice Quality Change (VQC) was self-assessed using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very unnoticeable, 5 = very noticeable; 3 = neutral). Ratings were recorded at the end of each VTS session. The score reflects the overall longitudinal change in symptoms experienced after treatment end. VQC at week 8 was computed as the mean of the last three sessions of the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relative Change in Perceived Speech Effort (rPSE) for VTS Application Method8 weeksRelative change in PSE (rPSE) was calculated as \[(Post - Pre) / Pre\] × 100. The between-group difference in mean rPSE comparing VTS received during direct skin contact vs. VTS collar was assessed over the total study period of 8 weeks to understand if the VTS applied directly to the skin was more effective in reducing speech effort than VTS applied via the collar.
Adherence Rate (Feasibility)Week 1-4Number of participants who completed at least 80% of prescribed VTS sessions during the intervention period.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJuergen Konczak, PhD

University of Minnesota

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Data collection occurred between the 21st November 2023 and the 28th October 2024. Recruitment ended on 29th October 2024. A total of 40 participants were enrolled. Of these, 34 participants began study procedures and 32 participants completed the study.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
16 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
16 Participants
Age, Continuous62.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2
Perceived Speech Effort5.5 Score on a scale of 1-10
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 32
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 32
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 32

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 16, 2026