Skip to content

Development and Adaptation of I-STRONG for SCD

Integrative Training Program for Pediatric Sickle Cell Pain (I-STRONG for SCD): Optimizing Feasibility and Acceptability

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06110754
Enrollment
45
Registered
2023-11-01
Start date
2023-06-08
Completion date
2024-06-14
Last updated
2025-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sickle Cell Disease

Keywords

Sickle cell pain, Pediatrics, Mind-body intervention, Behavioral intervention

Brief summary

This study develops and tests the feasibility and acceptability of an adapted intervention, Integrative Strong Body and Mind Training (I-STRONG), in adolescents with pain from sickle cell disease.

Detailed description

Pain is the hallmark feature of sickle cell disease (SCD), a life-limiting chronic illness that disproportionately affects African Americans. Well-documented racial disparities complicate effective pain control and the under-treatment of pain experienced by Black Americans with SCD. Approximately 20% of youth with SCD develop chronic pain and experience significant functional impairment, diminished quality of life, and comorbid depression and anxiety that can worsen over time. Youth with chronic SCD pain often are stuck in a vicious cycle of pain, functional impairment, and pain-related fear of movement that contributes to activity avoidance and exacerbates pain. The most effective chronic SCD pain management requires multicomponent, interdisciplinary treatment approaches that include integrative mind-body treatments. Mind-body approaches, specifically diaphragmatic breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, and guided imagery, can improve outcomes for youth with chronic pain. However, multicomponent interventions tailored for chronic SCD pain have never been established. Most pain interventions are developed and studied largely with white youth, do not address cultural influences, and consequently have limited generalizability for minoritized populations that experience health disparities like SCD. There is a critical need for effective, culturally tailored, integrative pain management approaches to address health disparities and improve outcomes for youth with SCD whose chronic pain can persist into adulthood. To address this unmet need, the researchers will leverage an existing innovative intervention designed for juvenile fibromyalgia, the Fibromyalgia Integrative Training for Teens (FIT Teens). Recent clinical practice guidelines for SCD pain identified fibromyalgia as most closely aligned with chronic pain in SCD to inform treatment recommendations; thus, FIT Teens is well-suited for adaptation and testing for SCD. FIT Teens is an 8-week (16 session) group-based telehealth intervention that combines mind-body, cognitive-behavioral, and neuromuscular movement approaches. Early trials of FIT Teens found excellent patient engagement, and medium to large effects on reducing disability, pain, depressive symptoms, and fear of movement without adverse effects of pain exacerbation. An ongoing multicenter trial of FIT Teens has excellent patient retention (\>80%, n=300 enrolled). The mind-body, cognitive-behavioral, and neuromuscular movement treatment components will form the basis of a new multicomponent integrative intervention tailored for SCD. Aim 1 of this study is to adapt and refine the integrative components of the FIT Teens intervention to develop a new culturally tailored I-STRONG intervention for youth with chronic SCD pain. The investigators will conduct mixed method approaches and purposive sampling to collect qualitative feedback informed by patient and family lived experiences regarding intervention content, format, perceived benefits, and barriers/facilitators to engagement from 15 patients (12 to 18 years of age) with chronic SCD pain and their parents and about 8 adolescents and 8 parents to participate in stakeholder advisory boards. Community stakeholder advisory boards and iterative design will inform intervention adaptation and refinement to enhance clinical implementation. Outcome measures are not collected from participants in Aim 1 as the purpose of this part of the study is to prepare the I-STRONG intervention to be studied for Aim 2. Aim 2 of the study is to assess feasibility and acceptability of I-STRONG intervention for youth with chronic SCD pain. The investigators will conduct a single-arm proof-of-concept study of the I-STRONG intervention with 12 adolescents (12 to 18 years of age), and the parents of adolescents under the age of 18, to iteratively optimize the feasibility and acceptability of I-STRONG in youth with chronic SCD pain. Feasibility will be demonstrated by rates of study enrollment, retention, and adherence (target goals set at ≥ 75%). Acceptability will be demonstrated by treatment burden, satisfaction, and tolerability. Qualitative feedback about the program format and content will inform additional intervention optimization, refinement, and enhance feasibility and acceptability. Support from and inclusion in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Helping to End Addiction Long-term Initiative (HEAL), or NIH HEAL Initiative, is provided for this study. For more information about the initiative visit the HEAL Initiative (https://heal.nih.gov/).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALI-STRONG for SCD

I-STRONG for SCD is a group-based, multi-component intervention that includes mind-body, cognitive-behavioral, and neuromuscular movement training. The intervention includes 16 sessions that occur over 8 weeks. Adolescents attend every session and parents attend 6 of the 16 sessions.

Sponsors

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
CollaboratorNIH
Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants in Aim 1 provide feedback for adapting I-STRONG for SCD while participants in Aim 2 receive the I-STRONG for SCD intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with SCD (any genotype) * Score of at least 3 (indicating medium to high risk for chronic pain) on the Pediatric Pain Screening Tool * Stable disease-modifying treatments, if applicable, as defined by no newly initiated or significantly increased dosages (mg/kg) in the past 3 months (Aim 2 only) * English fluency (Aim 2 only)

Exclusion criteria

* Comorbid medical conditions typically associated with pain but unrelated to SCD (e.g., rheumatologic disorders or inflammatory bowel disease) * Presence of a condition(s) or diagnosis, either physical or psychological, or physical exam finding that precludes participation (e.g., severe avascular necrosis with limited or non-weight bearing restrictions, significant cognitive or developmental limitations, active suicidal ideation) (Aim 2 only) * Adolescent receiving active treatment (e.g., weekly appointments with a provider) for nonpharmacological therapies (e.g, structured behavioral pain management, physical therapy, or acupuncture program) that overlap with the active phase of the study intervention (Aim 2 only)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Severity ScoreBaseline, Post-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)Pain intensity is rated with the pain severity item of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The single item is scored on a scale from 0 to 10 where no pain = 0 and severe pain = 10.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) ScoreBaseline, Post-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)Depressive symptoms in past two weeks among adolescent and parent study participants is assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8). The PHQ-8 has 8 items that are responded to on a 4-point scale where not at all = 0 and nearly every day = 3. Total scores range from 0 to 24 where higher scores indicate increased symptoms of depression.
General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) ScoreBaseline, Post-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)General worry in past two weeks among adolescent and parent study participants is assessed with the General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) instrument. The GAD-2 has 2 items that are responded to on a 4-point scale where not at all = 0 and nearly every day = 3. Total scores range from 0 to 6 where higher scores indicate increased experiences of worry.
Pain Catastrophizing Scale ScoreBaseline, Post-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-Treatment (Month 5)Exaggerated worried thoughts of pain are assessed among adolescent and parent study participants. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Child and Parent Report, is a 13-item well-validated self-report and parent-report measure of worried thoughts about pain. Items are answered on a 5-point scale where 0 = not true at all and 4 = very true. Total scores range from 0 to 52 and higher scores indicate increased catastrophic thinking.
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) ScoreBaseline, Post-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)Health-related quality of life and impact on child and family in the past month is assessed among adolescent study participants with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). The 23-item PedsQL was developed as part of the NIH Roadmap Initiative to create universal measures for patient-reported outcomes and contains questions in the domains of social-peer, depression, anxiety, mobility, and function. Responses are given on a 5-point scale where 0 = never and 4 = almost always. Items are reverse scored and linearly transformed to a scale of 0 to 100, where higher total mean scores indicate a better quality of life.
Adolescent Sleep-Wake Scale (ASWS) ScoreBaseline, Post-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)The Adolescent Sleep Wake Scale (ASWS) is a 28-item patient-reported describing the occurrence and frequency of various behavioral sleep characteristics over the past month. Responses are given on a 6-point Likert scale where 1 = always and 6 = never. Total scores range from 28 to 168 and higher scores indicate better sleep quality.
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Interference ScoreBaseline, Post-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)Functional interference due to pain rated with the impact of pain on daily functions item of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The single item is scored on a scale from 0 to 10 where no pain = 0 and severe pain = 10.
Days of Opioid Use Per WeekBaseline, Post-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)Daily use of opioid pain medication is determined based on participant completion of daily diaries for one week at each assessment visit. Participants record opioid use daily as presence or absence of use.
Change in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScorePost-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)The overall self-reported rating of the efficacy of treatment is assessed with the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) instrument. The PGIC asks respondents to rate their overall improvement compared to baseline. Responses are given on a scale of 1 to 7 where 1 = very much improved and 7 = very much worse.
Treatment Evaluation Inventory-Short Form (TEI-SF) ScorePost-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)The Treatment Evaluation Inventory-Short Form is completed at the end of treatment. It includes 9 items adapted to be specific to pediatric pain. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. Total scores range from 9 to 45. Higher scores indicate increased acceptability with the study treatment.
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) ScoreBaseline, Post-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)Fear of movement related to fear of pain is assessed with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) instrument. The TSK is a 17-item questionnaire where responses are given on a 4-point Likert scale. Responses of strongly agree are coded as 1 and responses of strongly agree are coded as 4. Total scores range from 17 to 68 where higher scores indicate greater kinesiophobia.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)-Modified ASSIST (NM ASSIST) Tool Level 2Baseline, 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)Substance use among adolescent study participants during the past 3 months is assessed with the NIDA-Modified Assist Tool Level 2 for children aged 11-17. The instrument asks respondents how often they have used 15 different substances. Responses are given on a 5-point scale where not at all = 0, less than a day or two = 1, several days = 2, more than half the days = 3, and nearly every day = 4. Responses to items were then scored as either 0 for non-use of a particular substance or 1 for any use of a particular substance (encompassing scale scores of 1 - 4). The tool is scored as the number of items with a score of greater than 0. The total score ranges from 0 to 15 with higher values indicating use of a greater number of substances.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from Children's Healthcare of Atlanta in Atlanta, Georgia, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center in Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. Participants for Aim 1 were enrolled June through October 2023. Participant enrollment for Aim 2 began October 24, 2023 and all follow-up assessments were completed by June 14, 2024.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Development of I-STRONG for SCD - Adolescents (Aim 1)
Adolescents with sickle cell disease completing in-depth interviews over two sessions as part of adapting an integrative, multicomponent, behavioral intervention combining mind-body, cognitive, and behavioral coping skills with neuromuscular exercise training for adolescents with chronic SCD pain.
12
Development of I-STRONG for SCD - Adults (Aim 1)
Parents of adolescents with sickle cell disease completing in-depth interviews over two sessions as part of adapting an integrative, multicomponent, behavioral intervention combining mind-body, cognitive, and behavioral coping skills with neuromuscular exercise training for adolescents with chronic SCD pain.
12
I-STRONG for Adolescents With SCD (Aim 2)
Adolescents with sickle cell disease participating in the I-STRONG intervention. I-STRONG for SCD is a group-based, multi-component intervention that includes mind-body, cognitive-behavioral, and neuromuscular movement training. The intervention includes 16 sessions that occur over 8 weeks. Adolescents attend each of the 16 sessions.
12
I-STRONG for Parents of Adolescents With SCD (Aim 2)
Parents of adolescents with sickle cell disease participating in the I-STRONG intervention. Parents are enrolled when the adolescent is under the age of 18. I-STRONG for SCD is a group-based, multi-component intervention that includes mind-body, cognitive-behavioral, and neuromuscular movement training. The intervention includes 16 sessions that occur over 8 weeks. Parents attend 6 of the 16 sessions.
9
Total45

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDevelopment of I-STRONG for SCD - Adolescents (Aim 1)Development of I-STRONG for SCD - Adults (Aim 1)I-STRONG for Adolescents With SCD (Aim 2)I-STRONG for Parents of Adolescents With SCD (Aim 2)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
12 Participants0 Participants9 Participants0 Participants21 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants12 Participants3 Participants9 Participants24 Participants
Age, Continuous16.03 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.58
39.50 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.63
16.30 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.61
40.80 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
26.27 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.36
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants11 Participants12 Participants8 Participants43 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
12 Participants12 Participants12 Participants8 Participants44 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 Participants12 Participants12 Participants9 Participants45 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants12 Participants5 Participants9 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants0 Participants7 Participants0 Participants13 Participants
Sickle Cell Disease Genotype
HbSC (Aim 2)
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Sickle Cell Disease Genotype
HbSC or HbSβ+ thalassemia (Aim 1 categorization)
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Sickle Cell Disease Genotype
HbSS (Aim 2)
0 Participants8 Participants8 Participants
Sickle Cell Disease Genotype
HbSS or HbSβ0 thalassemia (Aim 1 categorization)
11 Participants0 Participants11 Participants
Sickle Cell Disease Genotype
HbSβ0 thalassemia (Aim 2)
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sickle Cell Disease Genotype
HbSβ+ thalassemia (Aim 2)
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Severity Score

Pain intensity is rated with the pain severity item of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The single item is scored on a scale from 0 to 10 where no pain = 0 and severe pain = 10.

Time frame: Baseline, Post-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)

Population: The analysis population includes adolescent participants who completed the indicated study visit and completed the survey. One participant withdrew prior to the post-treatment assessment at Week 8 and an additional participant declined to complete the surveys at the 3 months post-treatment assessment at Month 5.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Severity ScoreBaseline5.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Severity ScorePost-treatment (Week 8)4.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.96
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Severity Score3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)3.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.15
Secondary

Adolescent Sleep-Wake Scale (ASWS) Score

The Adolescent Sleep Wake Scale (ASWS) is a 28-item patient-reported describing the occurrence and frequency of various behavioral sleep characteristics over the past month. Responses are given on a 6-point Likert scale where 1 = always and 6 = never. Total scores range from 28 to 168 and higher scores indicate better sleep quality.

Time frame: Baseline, Post-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)

Population: The analysis population includes adolescent participants who completed the indicated study visit and completed the survey. One participant withdrew prior to the post-treatment assessment at Week 8 and an additional participant declined to complete the surveys at the 3 months post-treatment assessment at Month 5.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Adolescent Sleep-Wake Scale (ASWS) ScoreBaseline38.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.73
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Adolescent Sleep-Wake Scale (ASWS) ScorePost-treatment (Week 8)37.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.98
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Adolescent Sleep-Wake Scale (ASWS) Score3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)41.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.58
Secondary

Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Interference Score

Functional interference due to pain rated with the impact of pain on daily functions item of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The single item is scored on a scale from 0 to 10 where no pain = 0 and severe pain = 10.

Time frame: Baseline, Post-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)

Population: The analysis population includes adolescent participants who completed the indicated study visit and completed the survey. One participant withdrew prior to the post-treatment assessment at Week 8, an additional participant declined to complete the surveys at the 3 months post-treatment assessment at Month 5, and one participant did not complete this survey during the 3 months post-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Interference ScoreBaseline3.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.09
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Interference ScorePost-treatment (Week 8)4.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Interference Score3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)2.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.15
Secondary

Change in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score

The overall self-reported rating of the efficacy of treatment is assessed with the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) instrument. The PGIC asks respondents to rate their overall improvement compared to baseline. Responses are given on a scale of 1 to 7 where 1 = very much improved and 7 = very much worse.

Time frame: Post-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)

Population: The analysis population includes adolescent participants who completed the indicated study visit and completed the survey. One participant withdrew prior to the post-treatment assessment at Week 8 and two additional participants declined to complete this survey at the 3 months post-treatment assessment at Month 5.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Change in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoreBaseline to Post-treatment (Week 8)1.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Change in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoreBaseline to 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)1.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Secondary

Days of Opioid Use Per Week

Daily use of opioid pain medication is determined based on participant completion of daily diaries for one week at each assessment visit. Participants record opioid use daily as presence or absence of use.

Time frame: Baseline, Post-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed any number of days of the daily diaries for the indicated time point. Some participants did not complete any diary days.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Days of Opioid Use Per WeekBaseline1.00 days per week of opioid useStandard Deviation 2.12
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Days of Opioid Use Per WeekPost-treatment (Week 8)1.70 days per week of opioid useStandard Deviation 2.49
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Days of Opioid Use Per Week3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)2.25 days per week of opioid useStandard Deviation 2.25
Secondary

General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) Score

General worry in past two weeks among adolescent and parent study participants is assessed with the General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) instrument. The GAD-2 has 2 items that are responded to on a 4-point scale where not at all = 0 and nearly every day = 3. Total scores range from 0 to 6 where higher scores indicate increased experiences of worry.

Time frame: Baseline, Post-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)

Population: The analysis population includes adolescent and adult participants who completed the indicated study visit and completed the survey. One adolescent participant withdrew prior to the post-treatment assessment at Week 8 and an additional participant declined to complete the surveys at the 3 months post-treatment assessment at Month 5.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) ScoreBaseline2.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.72
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) ScorePost-treatment (Week 8)1.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) Score3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)1.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.32
I-STRONG for Parents of Adolescents With SCDGeneral Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) ScoreBaseline2.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
I-STRONG for Parents of Adolescents With SCDGeneral Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) ScorePost-treatment (Week 8)1.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
I-STRONG for Parents of Adolescents With SCDGeneral Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) Score3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)1.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Secondary

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)-Modified ASSIST (NM ASSIST) Tool Level 2

Substance use among adolescent study participants during the past 3 months is assessed with the NIDA-Modified Assist Tool Level 2 for children aged 11-17. The instrument asks respondents how often they have used 15 different substances. Responses are given on a 5-point scale where not at all = 0, less than a day or two = 1, several days = 2, more than half the days = 3, and nearly every day = 4. Responses to items were then scored as either 0 for non-use of a particular substance or 1 for any use of a particular substance (encompassing scale scores of 1 - 4). The tool is scored as the number of items with a score of greater than 0. The total score ranges from 0 to 15 with higher values indicating use of a greater number of substances.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)

Population: The analysis population includes adolescent participants who completed the indicated study visit and completed the survey. One participant withdrew prior to the post-treatment assessment at Week 8 and an additional participant declined to complete the surveys at the 3 months post-treatment assessment at Month 5.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)-Modified ASSIST (NM ASSIST) Tool Level 2Baseline0.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)-Modified ASSIST (NM ASSIST) Tool Level 23 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)0.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Secondary

Pain Catastrophizing Scale Score

Exaggerated worried thoughts of pain are assessed among adolescent and parent study participants. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Child and Parent Report, is a 13-item well-validated self-report and parent-report measure of worried thoughts about pain. Items are answered on a 5-point scale where 0 = not true at all and 4 = very true. Total scores range from 0 to 52 and higher scores indicate increased catastrophic thinking.

Time frame: Baseline, Post-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-Treatment (Month 5)

Population: The analysis population includes adolescent and adult participants who completed the indicated study visit and completed the survey. One adolescent participant withdrew prior to the post-treatment assessment at Week 8 and an additional participant declined to complete the surveys at the 3 months post-treatment assessment at Month 5.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Pain Catastrophizing Scale ScoreBaseline24.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.05
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Pain Catastrophizing Scale ScorePost-treatment (Week 8)22.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.06
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Pain Catastrophizing Scale Score3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)21.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.33
I-STRONG for Parents of Adolescents With SCDPain Catastrophizing Scale ScoreBaseline28.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2
I-STRONG for Parents of Adolescents With SCDPain Catastrophizing Scale ScorePost-treatment (Week 8)30.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
I-STRONG for Parents of Adolescents With SCDPain Catastrophizing Scale Score3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)26.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Secondary

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) Score

Depressive symptoms in past two weeks among adolescent and parent study participants is assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8). The PHQ-8 has 8 items that are responded to on a 4-point scale where not at all = 0 and nearly every day = 3. Total scores range from 0 to 24 where higher scores indicate increased symptoms of depression.

Time frame: Baseline, Post-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)

Population: The analysis population includes adolescent and adult participants who completed the indicated study visit and completed the survey. One adolescent participant withdrew prior to the post-treatment assessment at Week 8 and an additional participant declined to complete the surveys at the 3 months post-treatment assessment at Month 5.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) ScoreBaseline6.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.69
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) ScorePost-treatment (Week 8)6.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.52
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) Score3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)5.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.41
I-STRONG for Parents of Adolescents With SCDPatient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) ScoreBaseline5.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
I-STRONG for Parents of Adolescents With SCDPatient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) ScorePost-treatment (Week 8)5.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
I-STRONG for Parents of Adolescents With SCDPatient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) Score3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)5.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
Secondary

Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Score

Health-related quality of life and impact on child and family in the past month is assessed among adolescent study participants with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). The 23-item PedsQL was developed as part of the NIH Roadmap Initiative to create universal measures for patient-reported outcomes and contains questions in the domains of social-peer, depression, anxiety, mobility, and function. Responses are given on a 5-point scale where 0 = never and 4 = almost always. Items are reverse scored and linearly transformed to a scale of 0 to 100, where higher total mean scores indicate a better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Post-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)

Population: The analysis population includes adolescent participants who completed the indicated study visit and completed the survey. One participant withdrew prior to the post-treatment assessment at Week 8 and an additional participant declined to complete the surveys at the 3 months post-treatment assessment at Month 5. This survey was not administered to parents.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) ScoreBaseline69.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.03
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) ScorePost-treatment (Week 8)64.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.25
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Score3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)73.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.56
Secondary

Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) Score

Fear of movement related to fear of pain is assessed with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) instrument. The TSK is a 17-item questionnaire where responses are given on a 4-point Likert scale. Responses of strongly agree are coded as 1 and responses of strongly agree are coded as 4. Total scores range from 17 to 68 where higher scores indicate greater kinesiophobia.

Time frame: Baseline, Post-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)

Population: The analysis population includes adolescent participants who completed the indicated study visit and completed the survey. One participant withdrew prior to the post-treatment assessment at Week 8 and an additional participant declined to complete the surveys at the 3 months post-treatment assessment at Month 5.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) ScoreBaseline25.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.93
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) ScorePost-treatment (Week 8)25.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.24
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) Score3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)24.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.78
Secondary

Treatment Evaluation Inventory-Short Form (TEI-SF) Score

The Treatment Evaluation Inventory-Short Form is completed at the end of treatment. It includes 9 items adapted to be specific to pediatric pain. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. Total scores range from 9 to 45. Higher scores indicate increased acceptability with the study treatment.

Time frame: Post-treatment (Week 8), 3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)

Population: The analysis population includes adolescent participants who completed the indicated study visit and completed the survey. One participant withdrew prior to the post-treatment assessment at Week 8 and an additional participant declined to complete the surveys at the 3 months post-treatment assessment at Month 5. This survey was not administered to parents.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Treatment Evaluation Inventory-Short Form (TEI-SF) ScorePost-treatment (Week 8)34.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.23
I-STRONG for Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Treatment Evaluation Inventory-Short Form (TEI-SF) Score3 Months Post-treatment (Month 5)33.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.23

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 24, 2026