Skip to content

A New Clinical Use of Ferumoxytol Nanoparticles: An Antibiofilm Treatment

A New Clinical Use of Ferumoxytol Nanoparticles: An Antibiofilm Treatment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06110494
Enrollment
44
Registered
2023-10-31
Start date
2020-07-13
Completion date
2022-03-10
Last updated
2024-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Apical Periodontitis, Pulp Disease, Dental

Keywords

Pulp infection, Nanotechnology, antibacterial, disinfection, iron oxide nanoparticles

Brief summary

The goal of this observational is study is to develop a protocol for root canal biofilms disinfection using a clinically approved and commercially available iron oxide nanoparticle formulation Ferumoxytol/H2O2 treatments. This protocol will be testing local single topical application of Ferumoxytol within the root canal system in patients going through routine root canal treatment, evaluate its potential as anti-biofilm treatment and compare it to the clinical gold standard disinfecting solution sodium hypochlorite (positive control) and saline (negative control).

Detailed description

Patients presenting to the Department of Endodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania for evaluation and routine endodontic treatment of infected, necrotic teeth with chronic apical periodontitis will be asked to take part in the study if they meet the inclusion criteria and volunteer to participate. After eligibility of the patient is confirmed, the patient will be assigned to treatments through the process of drawing lots from a box that was maintained in a locked cabinet. Before treatment, patients will be thoroughly informed about the nature, potential risks and alternatives of the study as well as the root canal treatment. Patients will be presented with a written consent form regarding the above mentioned study characteristics as well as the regular consent forms for the root canal therapy, including the consent form for endodontic treatement, acknowledgement of privacy practices and a patient understanding and informed consent form. Briefly, the patient will be anesthetized and the tooth isolated with rubber dam. 30% H2O2 followed by 3% NaOCl will be used to disinfect the tooth and the rubber dam. The removal of caries and the endodontic access will be carried out by sterile high-speed carbide burs.After access preparation with sterile burs and sterile saline irrigation, thermoplastic gutta percha was placed to temporarily block the orifice. The field, including the pulp chamber, is cleaned and disinfected as described previously. NaOCl is neutralized with 10% sodium thiosulfate. Contamination control sample (S0) will be taken from the internal cavosurface angle where the paper points will accidentally touch during sampling.After initial access to the root canal orifices, working length will be measured and a bacteriological sample will be taken from the targeted canals (S1). Sterile paper points will be placed into the canal, allowed to saturate and then transferred to a vial containing liquid dental transport media (LDT). For NaOCl group (Positive control), canals will be instrumented up to size 25/0.04 taper using 2mL of 3% NaOCl in between files. For Ferumoxytol/H2O2 group, canals will be instrumented up to size 25/0.04 taper using 2mL of a mixture of 6 mg/ml of Ferumoxytol with 3% H2O2. For saline only group, canals will be instrumented up to size 25/0.04 taper using 2mL of saline. When the final 25/0.04 taper apical size is reached, a second bacterial sample will be taken (S2). Before all samplings, sodium hypochlorite, Feramehe/ H2O2 and Saline. Canal contents will be deactivated with sodium thiosulphate for NaOCl,and saline wash will be used for Fer/H2O2 and saline treatments. A wash step with 1 mL saline was done to wash the deactivating solution, and paper points were used to dry the canals. A second bacterial sample was taken (S2) by placing LDT inside the canal, agitating it with 25/0.02 Hedstrom hand file, followed by absorbing the content with 2 paper points placed in the canal for 30 seconds each. The paper points will be placed inside a tube containing LDT. An additional step was included for all the test groups to evaluate if further irrigation after (S2) will lead to more reduction of bacterial counts inside the root canal system. This could inform future experiments evaluating the possibility of synergistic antimicrobial effects for the sequential Fer/H2O2 and NaOCl treatment. All canals in all groups were irrigated with 2 mL of 3% NaOCl (1 min), followed by ultrasonic irrigant activation for 30 seconds. This step was repeated once again making the total activation time 1 min and the total contact time of the irrigant 3 min. Upon completion of irrigation, a third bacterial sample (S3) was taken following the deactivation, washing, drying, and sampling steps as described previously. The remaining treatment sequences of the routine root canal therapy will be carried out after these procedures including further root-end enlargement and final routine irrigation protocol. The root canals will be dried with paper points, a medication (calcium hydroxide) will be placed and the teeth sealed with a temporary restoration. Patients will return after one to four weeks for completion of the root filling. For the any of the groups, the treatment procedures carried out during this investigation do not differ from the standard root canal treatment protocol with the exception of additional irrigation step with the experimental solution and the bacteriologic sampling procedures. The paper points used to take the bacteriological sampling will be transferred to the microbiology laboratory using a vial containing 1 ml of LDT. The laboratory procedures will be performed at the University of Pennsylvania Leon Levy Oral Health Sciences Building of the School of Dental Medicine in the Microbiology Laboratory Vial labels will contain information on tooth number, sample number (S0-S1-S2-S3) and the experimental group. The samples will be diluted and plated in culture plates. The culture plates will be incubated at 37°C in an anaerobic glove box containing 5% hydrogen, 5% CO2 and balance N2 for 5 days. After incubation the number of colony forming units will be determined by using a stereoscope. ANOVA and Students t-test will be used for statistical analysis.

Interventions

DRUGIron oxide nanoparticles treatment Ferumoxytol/H2O2

Participants receive a topical treatment through a root canal irrigation needle containing A mixture of 6mg/mL Ferumoxytol nanoparticles solution mixed with 3% H2O2 for 10 minutes contact time

DRUGNaOCl

Participants receive a topical treatment through a root canal irrigation needle containing 3% NaOCl for 10 minutes contact time

DRUGNaCl

Participants receive a topical treatment through a root canal irrigation needle containing 0.89% NaCl for 10 minutes contact time

DRUGsupplementary irrigation

All canals in all groups were irrigated with 2 mL of 3% NaOCl, followed by ultrasonic irrigant activation for 30s twice. seconds. This step was repeated once again making the total activation time 1 min and the total contact time of the irrigant 3 min. Upon completion of irrigation, a third bacterial sample (S3) was taken following the deactivation, washing, drying, and sampling steps as described previously

Sponsors

University of Pennsylvania
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients to welling to participate in the study. 2. Patients are 18 years or above. 3. Non-contributory medical history (Patient can be seen for regular dental appointment in PDM; ASA classes I and II). 4. Tooth requiring root canal treatment with radiographic presence of periapical radiolucency and responding to thermal sensitivity testing negatively (difluordichlormethane at 50 °C) (Endo-Ice, Coltène/Whaledent Inc., Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio) and Negatively to EPT testing. 5. Tooth with adequate remaining tooth structure for proper isolation with rubber dam. 6. No history of previous endodontic treatment on the tooth. 7. Teeth with single canal and single and roots with single canals in multirooted teeth.

Exclusion criteria

1. Self-reported Pregnancy. 2. Patients requiring antibiotic premedication prior to dental treatment. 3. Patients with multiple drug allergies. 4. Patients with known hypersensitivity to Ferumoxytol nanoparticles or any iron products. 5. Patients who are scheduled for MRI for the head region within three months after Fer nanoparticles application. 6. Periodontal changes (pockets 3 mm, mobility Grade I or gingival edema). 7. Radiographic presence of resorptive processes. 8. Cracked and fractured teeth. 9. if one of the inclusion criteria is not met

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Primary Outcome Parameter Will be the Difference in Bacterial Reduction Between the Experimental and Control Disinfection Groups Group (Ferumoxytol) and Comparison Groups (Positive and Negative Controls).baseline (pretreatment) and after 10 minutes of treatment (post treatment)This study is designed to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of Ferumoxytol/H2O2 and to compare it to the gold standard disinfection solution (NaOCl) and negative control solution (NaCl). The outcome will be evaluated by taking bacterial samples from the root canals during routine root canal treatment before and after applying different disinfection protocols. The disinfection efficacy was calculated by comparing the difference in microbial CFU reduction (post treatment sample/pretreatment sample) between the three disinfection protocols

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Effect of Additional (Supplementary) Irrigation and Adjunctive Irrigant (NaOCl) Activation Using Passive Ultrasonic Activation After Irrigation With Experimental and Control Irrigants.the baseline of this measurement starts right after treatment with either experimental, negative or positive control agent (S2). This measurement ends after irrigating the canals with NaOCl and irritant activation for 3 minutes.All groups received an additional irrigation step with NaOCl with passive ultrasonic activation. An additional step was included for all the test groups to evaluate if further irrigation after (S2) will lead to more reduction of bacterial counts inside the root canal system. This could inform future experiments evaluating the possibility of synergistic antimicrobial effects for the sequential ferumoxytol and NaOCl treatment.
The Overall Effect of Antimicrobial Irrigation of Infected Root Canals Using Experimental and Control Irrigants, in Addition to Supplementary Irrigant (NaOCl) Activation.This measure starts at baseline (pretreatment) (S1). This measure ends after 10 minutes of treatment with either experimental, positive or negative control irrigants and additional 3 minutes of supplementary irrigation (S3)All groups received treated with either Experimental (ferumoxytol), NaOCl (positive control) or Saline (NaCl, negative control). Followed by supplementary irrigation and activation. This could inform future experiments evaluating the possibility of synergistic antimicrobial effects for the sequential ferumoxytol and NaOCl treatment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients presenting to the Department of Endodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania for evaluation and routine endodontic treatment of infected, necrotic teeth with chronic apical periodontitis were asked if they would like to take part in the study and volunteer to participate.

Pre-assignment details

Forty-four (44) patients presenting to the endodontic with an initial diagnosis of pulp necrosis were assessed for eligibility. Seven (7) patients were initially excluded during the eligibility assessment (not meeting inclusion criteria (n=4);declined to participate (n=3). five patients were part of a pilot to test different bacterial sampling methods prior to the experimental phase

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Treatment Ferumoxytol/H2O2
After access preparation with sterile burs and sterile saline irrigation and working length determination as part of routine root canal treatment, and after obtaining a pre-treatment bacteriological samples, 2 mL of a mixture of Ferumoxytol (6mg/mL)/H2O2(3%) was introduced into the canal. Canals were instrumented with 15/0.04, 20/0.04, and 25/0.04 rotary files using 2 mL of treatment solution after each file with a total of 8 mL of solution used and a total contact time of 10 minutes. Iron oxide nanoparticles treatment Ferumoxytol/H2O2: Participants receive a topical treatment through a root canal irrigation needle containing A mixture of 6mg/mL Ferumoxytol nanoparticles solution mixed with 3% H2O2 for 10 minutes contact time
11
Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl)
After access preparation with sterile burs and sterile saline irrigation and working length determination as part of routine root canal treatment, and after obtaining a pre-treatment bacteriological samples, 2 mL of 3% NaOCl was introduced into the canal. Canals were instrumented with 15/0.04, 20/0.04, and 25/0.04 rotary files using 2 mL of solution after each file with a total of 8 mL of treatment solution used and a total contact time of 10 minutes. NaOCl: Participants receive a topical treatment through a root canal irrigation needle containing 3% NaOCl for 10 minutes contact time
11
Saline (NaCl)
After access preparation with sterile burs and sterile saline irrigation and working length determination as part of routine root canal treatment, and after obtaining a pre-treatment bacteriological samples, 2 mL of 0.89% NaCl was introduced into the canal. Canals were instrumented with 15/0.04, 20/0.04, and 25/0.04 rotary files using 2 mL of treatment solution after each file with a total of 8 mL of solution used and a total contact time of 10 minutes. NaCl: Participants receive a topical treatment through a root canal irrigation needle containing 0.89% NaCl for 10 minutes contact time
10
Total32

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDixon's test for outlier analysis110
Overall StudyProtocol Violation201

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIron Oxide Nanoparticles Treatment Ferumoxytol/H2O2Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl)Saline (NaCl)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
11 Participants11 Participants10 Participants32 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
11 participants11 participants10 participants32 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 110 / 110 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 110 / 110 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 110 / 110 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

The Primary Outcome Parameter Will be the Difference in Bacterial Reduction Between the Experimental and Control Disinfection Groups Group (Ferumoxytol) and Comparison Groups (Positive and Negative Controls).

This study is designed to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of Ferumoxytol/H2O2 and to compare it to the gold standard disinfection solution (NaOCl) and negative control solution (NaCl). The outcome will be evaluated by taking bacterial samples from the root canals during routine root canal treatment before and after applying different disinfection protocols. The disinfection efficacy was calculated by comparing the difference in microbial CFU reduction (post treatment sample/pretreatment sample) between the three disinfection protocols

Time frame: baseline (pretreatment) and after 10 minutes of treatment (post treatment)

Population: The antimicrobial effectiveness of Fer/H2O2 was evaluated by calculating the CFU log reduction of the viable microbial counts between pretreatment sample S1 and the post treatment sample S2 and compare it with the CFU log reduction of NaOCL and NaCl

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Treatment Ferumoxytol/H2O2The Primary Outcome Parameter Will be the Difference in Bacterial Reduction Between the Experimental and Control Disinfection Groups Group (Ferumoxytol) and Comparison Groups (Positive and Negative Controls).0.0002300 CFU log reduction
Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl)The Primary Outcome Parameter Will be the Difference in Bacterial Reduction Between the Experimental and Control Disinfection Groups Group (Ferumoxytol) and Comparison Groups (Positive and Negative Controls).0.0001056 CFU log reduction
Saline (NaCl)The Primary Outcome Parameter Will be the Difference in Bacterial Reduction Between the Experimental and Control Disinfection Groups Group (Ferumoxytol) and Comparison Groups (Positive and Negative Controls).0.01196 CFU log reduction
Comparison: The sample size estimate was calculated in Pass Software 2021, using a test that compares the ratio of two means from independent samples using data that has been log-normalized. An alpha of 0.05 and power of 80% was assumed, with means and standard deviations pulled from previous studies that employed similar methodology. This produced a required sample size of 16 for each group. Pairwise comparisons were done using Mann-Whitney U test to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness.p-value: 0.05Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

The Effect of Additional (Supplementary) Irrigation and Adjunctive Irrigant (NaOCl) Activation Using Passive Ultrasonic Activation After Irrigation With Experimental and Control Irrigants.

All groups received an additional irrigation step with NaOCl with passive ultrasonic activation. An additional step was included for all the test groups to evaluate if further irrigation after (S2) will lead to more reduction of bacterial counts inside the root canal system. This could inform future experiments evaluating the possibility of synergistic antimicrobial effects for the sequential ferumoxytol and NaOCl treatment.

Time frame: the baseline of this measurement starts right after treatment with either experimental, negative or positive control agent (S2). This measurement ends after irrigating the canals with NaOCl and irritant activation for 3 minutes.

Population: The antimicrobial effectiveness of supplementary irrigation was evaluated by calculating the CFU log reduction of the viable microbial counts between post treatment sample S2 and the post supplementary irrigation sample S3 and compare it with the CFU log reduction of NaOCL and NaCl (positive and negative controls)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Treatment Ferumoxytol/H2O2The Effect of Additional (Supplementary) Irrigation and Adjunctive Irrigant (NaOCl) Activation Using Passive Ultrasonic Activation After Irrigation With Experimental and Control Irrigants.1.000 CFU log reduction
Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl)The Effect of Additional (Supplementary) Irrigation and Adjunctive Irrigant (NaOCl) Activation Using Passive Ultrasonic Activation After Irrigation With Experimental and Control Irrigants.1 CFU log reduction
Saline (NaCl)The Effect of Additional (Supplementary) Irrigation and Adjunctive Irrigant (NaOCl) Activation Using Passive Ultrasonic Activation After Irrigation With Experimental and Control Irrigants.0.1360 CFU log reduction
Secondary

The Overall Effect of Antimicrobial Irrigation of Infected Root Canals Using Experimental and Control Irrigants, in Addition to Supplementary Irrigant (NaOCl) Activation.

All groups received treated with either Experimental (ferumoxytol), NaOCl (positive control) or Saline (NaCl, negative control). Followed by supplementary irrigation and activation. This could inform future experiments evaluating the possibility of synergistic antimicrobial effects for the sequential ferumoxytol and NaOCl treatment.

Time frame: This measure starts at baseline (pretreatment) (S1). This measure ends after 10 minutes of treatment with either experimental, positive or negative control irrigants and additional 3 minutes of supplementary irrigation (S3)

Population: The overall antimicrobial effectiveness of antimicrobial irrigation was evaluated by calculating the CFU log reduction of the viable microbial counts between baseline pretreatment sample (S1) and the post supplementary irrigation sample (S3). The CFU log reduction was compared between the groups (experimental and controls)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Treatment Ferumoxytol/H2O2The Overall Effect of Antimicrobial Irrigation of Infected Root Canals Using Experimental and Control Irrigants, in Addition to Supplementary Irrigant (NaOCl) Activation.0.0002360 CFU log reduction
Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl)The Overall Effect of Antimicrobial Irrigation of Infected Root Canals Using Experimental and Control Irrigants, in Addition to Supplementary Irrigant (NaOCl) Activation.0.0001590 CFU log reduction
Saline (NaCl)The Overall Effect of Antimicrobial Irrigation of Infected Root Canals Using Experimental and Control Irrigants, in Addition to Supplementary Irrigant (NaOCl) Activation.0.001630 CFU log reduction

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026