Skip to content

Clinical Presentations and Surgical Outcome of Obstructive Müllerian Anomalies

Clinical Presentations and Surgical Outcome of Obstructive Müllerian Anomalies: A Prospective Cohort Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06110052
Enrollment
36
Registered
2023-10-31
Start date
2022-12-01
Completion date
2023-12-01
Last updated
2023-10-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mullerian Duct Anomalies

Brief summary

The present study aims at: A. The main outcome is to compare preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale VAS from 0 to 10 of maximum perceived pain in ladies with OMAs. 1. description of clinical presentation and percentage of OMAs in relation to other Mullerian anomalies 2. description of different subtypes and its percentage. 3. description of the corrective procedures and their short-term outcomes.

Detailed description

Obstructive Mullerian anomalies (OMAs) represent a real challenge in diagnosis and treatment, its incidence is not yet recognized. Care givers and gynecologist should be aware with its clinical presentation to avoid its delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis. In addition, delayed diagnoses may result in retrograde menstruation, recurrent cyclic pains, chronic pelvic pains, poor quality of life and threats to future fertility. Cases with complete obstructive Müllerian anomalies (C-OMAs) classically present with recurrent cyclic pains at puberty and their diagnosis is usually established easily. However, cases with Hemi obstructive anomalies (H-OMA) usually present with progressive dysmenorrhea and delayed diagnosis may result in pelvic adhesions, progressive hematosalpinx and endometriosis which directly threats natural future fertility. H-OMAs may results from obstructing uterine septa or unilateral cervical obstruction in a double uterus. Also, it may result from obstructing longitudinal vaginal septa in cases with double uterus, septate uterus or hybrid septate uterus . A hybrid uterine anomaly is relatively a recent term that described the coexistence of septate and bicornuate uterus together. Pure septate uterus has a convex or flat fundus, when there is any fundal depression, it is termed hybrid septate uterus. Pain with or without amenorrhoea is the main presentation of OMAs. Surgical correction should improve these symptoms. To the best of our knowledge there is no published prospective trials compared visual analog scale VAS in ladies with OMAs before and after surgical correction.

Interventions

OTHERprospective follow up

compare preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale VAS of maximum perceived pain in ladies with OMAs

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE

Inclusion criteria

* All cases with OMAs or H-OMAs

Exclusion criteria

* Cases who refuse to participate in the study. 2.Cases who underwent previous surgical repair for their OMA or H-OMA.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
mullerian duct anomalies48 monthsA. The main outcome is to compare preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale VAS of maximum perceived pain in ladies with OMAs.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactDina A Mahmoud, MBBCH
dinaelsaman@yahoo.com01090054328

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026