Skip to content

Ergonomic Benefits From Robotically Assisted Laparoscopy for Hysterectomies and Other Indications

Ergonomic Benefits From Robotically Assisted Laparoscopy for Hysterectomies and Other Selected Indications in Comparison to Conventional Laparoscopy - an Explorative Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06109753
Acronym
ERCON
Enrollment
4
Registered
2023-10-31
Start date
2023-06-01
Completion date
2024-01-31
Last updated
2026-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions

Keywords

Muscular and mental demand, physical discomfort, eye strain

Brief summary

This is a prospective, single-center, observational clinical trial at the Department of Women's Health of the University Hospital Tübingen.

Detailed description

Monocentric trial to evaluate differences in musculoskeletal and cognitive demands of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS). Demographic and personal data are collected and pseudonymized. During surgery surface electromyography (EMG), electrocardiography (ECG), motion tracking data are collected and the surgery is documented by photos (1 photo/per second). Additionally, perceived physical discomfort (frequency and intensity) and mental load will be assessed within certain time intervals and at the very end of the surgery. The surgeon will not be disturbed in his actions and movement by the measurement equipment or applied procedures. Previous studies with similar designs can be seen as references in this context (549/2012BO1, 409/2013BO1, 262/2018BO1). After completing the surgery, the surgeon will rate difficulty of the surgery, work precision, eye strain and ergonomics during the surgery. Routine interventions like hysterectomies and other selected indications will be analyzed.

Interventions

PROCEDURERobotically Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery

robotically assisted surgeries of about 60-minute duration with additional 30 min for preparing with the measurement equipment before surgery and 15 post evaluation of the corresponding surgery

conventional surgeries of about 60-minute duration with additional 30 min for preparing with the measurement equipment before surgery and 15 post evaluation of the corresponding surgery

Sponsors

University Hospital Tuebingen
Lead SponsorOTHER
Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, Tuebingen
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 68 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 68 years * surgeons that are able to work in full shift * trained surgeons in RALS and CLS * written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* persons influenced by analgesics or muscle relaxants * persons not able to perform their common work for any reason * persons with acute diseases * muscle injury

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Muscle activity of the bilateral trapezius pars descendens muscleduring surgeryThe muscle activity of the bilateral trapezius pars descendens muscle will be assessed using surface electromyography, with the root-mean-square (RMS) of electrical muscle activity recordings measured through bipolar surface electrodes. Data will be normalized to an isometric voluntary maximum electrical activation (MVE).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Muscle activity of the bilateral forearm musclesduring surgeryThe muscle activity of the bilateral forearm muscles will be assessed using surface electromyography, with the root-mean-square (RMS) of electrical muscle activity recordings measured through bipolar surface electrodes. Data will be normalized to an isometric voluntary maximum electrical activation (MVE).
Kinematicsduring surgeryFor kinematics, the outcome measures involve the assessment of shoulder abduction, trunk, and head flexion angles in degrees, which are determined using gravimetric position sensors, providing precise measurements of body positioning during the task.
Perceived physical discomfortduring surgeryPerceived physical discomfort is evaluated by assessing its frequency and intensity. Frequency indicates the number of occurrences, while intensity is measured on a 0 to 10 scale, where higher values indicate more intense discomfort. These measurements are recorded at 20-minute intervals to monitor changes in discomfort over time.
Perceived mental demandduring surgeryPerceived mental demand is evaluated using the NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ) Task Load Index (TLX) questionnaire's mental demand dimension, providing a subjective score ranging from 0 to 21, reflecting the perceived cognitive load during the task. Higher values are representing higher perceived mental demand.
Perceived mental demand - Heart rateduring surgeryHeart rate (beats per minute) and heart rate variability, such as SDNN (standard deviation of the beat-to-beat differences in instantaneous heart rate), are recorded via electrocardiography to quantify physiological responses associated with mental demand.
Perceived mental demand - Heart rate variabilityduring surgeryHeart rate variability, to be precise SDNN (standard deviation of the beat-to-beat differences in instantaneous heart rate), are recorded via electrocardiography to quantify physiological responses associated with mental demand.
Work precisionduring surgeryWork precision is measured during surgery using a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 100 mm, providing an indication of the precision and accuracy of the surgical maneuvers performed.
Eye strainduring surgeryEye strain is evaluated using a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess the severity of eye strain, with each question scored on a scale from 0 to 6, aiding in the comprehensive understanding of the subjective experience of visual discomfort.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBenjamin Steinhilber, PD Dr.

Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBernhard Krämer, Prof. Dr.

University Women's Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026