Skip to content

Role of Hypothermia in Endovascular Stroke Thrombectomy

Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Thrombectomy With Versus Without Hypothermia in Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06109376
Acronym
COOLING
Enrollment
200
Registered
2023-10-31
Start date
2023-12-01
Completion date
2027-03-31
Last updated
2023-10-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke, Acute Ischemic

Keywords

endovascular thrombectomy, hypothermia, large vessel occlusion, randomized controlled trial

Brief summary

Reducing or suspending the increase of the infarcted core, i.e., freezing the ischemic penumbra, may help improve the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy. Hypothermia effectively reduces the metabolic level of brain tissue, may prolong the time window for recanalization therapy, and its multi-target therapeutic effect make it one of the most promising neuro-protection approach. In recent years, hypothermia has been increasingly used to treat acute ischemic stroke. However, its role in acute ischemic stroke is unclear. The objective of this trial is to investigate whether hypothermia combined with endovascular thrombectomy could add additional benefit without increasing the risk of adverse events such as pneumonia, intracerebral hemorrhage, and mortality.

Interventions

PROCEDUREhypothermia

In this trial, intra-arterial select cooling infusion is used to reduce brain tissue temperature to 33-35°C.

PROCEDUREthrombectomy

Thrombectomy includes treatment with stent retrievers and/or thromboaspiration, balloon angioplasty, stenting, intra-arterial thrombolysis, or the various combinations of these approaches.

Sponsors

Xiangtan Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged ≥ 18 years or more; 2. acute ischemic stroke within 24 hours from onset to randomization; 3. NIHSS ≥6 points before randomization; 4. Internal carotid artery, or the middle cerebral artery M1 or M2 occlusion confirmed by CTA/MRA/DSA; 5. Baseline ASPECTS score ≥ 3 and ≤8, or cerebral infarction core volume \< 100ml; 6. The patient decides to undergo endovascular therapy; 7. The patient or patient's representative signs a written informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

1. CT or MR evidence of hemorrhage; 2. Currently pregnant or lactating (women patients); 3. Allergy to radiographic contrast agents, or nitinol devices; 4. Arterial tortuosity and/or other arterial disease that would prevent the device from reaching the target vessel; 5. Multiple vessel occlusion (e.g., bilateral anterior circulation, or occlusion of both anterior and posterior circulation); 6. Preexisting neurological or psychiatric disease that would confound the neurological functional evaluations; 7. Previous bleeding disorders, severe heart, liver or kidney disease, or sepsis; 8. Brain tumors with mass effect (except meningiomas) that are radiographically pleasant; 9. Intracranial aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation; 10. Any terminal illness with life expectancy less than 6 months; 11. Participating in other clinical trials.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modified Rankin scale score (mRS)90 days post-randomizationModified Rankin scale score (mRS): scores range from 0 to 6, with 0 indicating no disability, 1 no clinically significant disability, 2 slight disability, 3 moderate disability but able to walk unassisted, 4 moderately severe disability, 5 severe disability, and 6 death

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Excellent outcome90 days post-randomizationScore of 0-1 on the modified Rankin scale
Functional independence90 days post-randomizationScore of 0-2 on the modified Rankin scale
Moderate outcome90 days post-randomizationScore of 0-3 on the modified Rankin scale
Early neurological improvement72 hours post-randomizationCompared with baseline NIHSS, the 72h NIHSS score is reduced by 8 points or more, or the 72h NIHSS is 0\ 1 point
EQ-5D-5L scale score90 days post-randomizationThe descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
Other serious adverse events90 days post-randomization
Successful reperfusion at final angiogramAt the end of angiography or procedureSuccessful reperfusion was defined as grade 2b to 3 on the extended Thrombectomy in the Cerebral Ischemia system.
Complications related to operation and device90 days post-randomizationvasospasm, arterial rupture, arterial dissection, vascular puncture point complications, etc.
Reperfusion on follow-up CT or MR angiography48 hours post-randomization
Incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH)48 hours post-randomizationusing Heidelberg criteria to assess SICH
incidence of any intracranial hemorrhage (any ICH)48 hours post-randomization
90-day mortality90 days post-randomization
Difference of hematocrit between baseline and 24-hour post-randomization24-hour post-randomization
Non-hemorrhagic serious adverse event rate90 days post-randomizationincluding pneumonia, respiratory failure, circulatory failure, cerebral herniation, secondary epilepsy, sepsis, renal failure, acute coronary syndrome, venous thrombosis, etc.
Difference between baseline and within 48h after procedure of infarction core volume (ml)48 hours post-randomization

Contacts

Primary ContactGuangxiong Yuan, M.S.
yuanguangxiong74@163.com18973223018

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026