Skip to content

Anti-reflux Mucosal Ablation Therapy Randomized Sham Control Trial for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Anti-reflux Mucosal Ablation Therapy for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: a Single Blind Randomized Sham Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06106100
Enrollment
68
Registered
2023-10-30
Start date
2024-03-31
Completion date
2027-10-31
Last updated
2024-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Brief summary

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to investigate the efficacy and safety of antireflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) for patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The trial aim to evaluate : * Efficacy of ARMA comparing with medical treatment alone (proton pump inhibitor (PPI)), using GERD-Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (GERD- HRQL questionnaire), improvement of acid exposure time and DeMeester score * Safety and complications of ARMA Participants will be randomly divided into 2 groups. The intervention group will be undergone ARMA, and the control group will be undergone sham endoscopic treatment. The primary endpoint will be symptoms relief (GERD-HRQL decreases \> 50%). The secondary endpoint will be dosage adjustment of PPI, complications, improvement of acid exposure time and DeMeester score.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAntireflux mucosal ablation

Patients are instructed to fast for 6 hours pre-procedurally, which are performed under intravenous propofol sedation. Retroflexion endoscopy to visualize the cardia is performed, followed by mucosa markings with straight-fire APC catheter (ERBE Electromedizin, Tübingen, Germany) in forced coagulation mode (VIO300D, ERBE Electromedizin, Tübingen, Germany, 20W). The marking site at 1-cm and 2-cm distal to squamocolumnar junction at anterior-posterior and lesser curvature site, respectively, sparing the greater curvature site of cardia, is done. After marking, mucosal ablation (forced coagulation mode, 1L/min, 80W) is performed at marking site in a hoarse-shoe shape. Adequate ablation depth is defined as reaching the submucosal layer with blackish discolored tissue with carbonization

PROCEDURESham procedure

Patients are instructed to fast for 6 hours pre-procedurally, which are performed under intravenous propofol sedation. Retroflexion endoscopy to visualize the cardia is performed. Using the straight-fire APC catheter to touch the marking sites similar to the treatment group without electrocauterization is performed.

Sponsors

Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged over 18 years old * History of GERD for over 6 months, who had received PPIs for over 6 months but still had symptoms of typical GERD symptoms (GERD-HRQL score of \>8, acid reflux sensation or heartburn), and/or other symptoms as lump throat, night cough, acid related chest tightness (without other possible explanation of these symptoms) * Acid exposure time \> 6% * DeMeester score ≥ 14.72

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * BMI\>=35 * Hiatal hernia \> 2cm or Flap Valve Hill grade III/IV * GERD LA grade C/D or esophageal ulcer * Abnormal anatomy of esophagus (esophagectomy, stricture, diverticulum) * Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia * Esophageal motility disorders * History of gastroparesis * Cirrhosis * Esophageal and gastric varices * Previous gastric surgery and anti-reflux procedures * History of scleroderma or dermatomyositis * Coagulation disorders (Bleeding tendency and coagulopathy) * History of oncological disease (not active within 2 years)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms3 monthsClinical success is defined as more than 50% improvement of the GERD-HRQL questionnaire at 3 months after the ARMA procedure. The results are from minimal 0 points up to 50 points. The higher the points, the greater the symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complication rate12 monthsRecording of all complications related to the ARMA procedure
PPI dependency12 monthsRequirement and dose of PPI at 3, 6 and 12 months after ARMA
Changes in acid exposure time12 monthsChanges in acid exposure time in 24 pH meter at 3 and 12 months after ARMA
Changes in DeMeester score12 monthsChanges in DeMeester score in 24 pH meter at 3 and 12 months after ARMA. A DeMeester score of ≤ 14.72 is considered physiological.
Changes in lower esophageal sphincter pressure12 monthsChanges in lower esophageal sphincter pressure in high resolution manometry at 3 and 12 months after ARMA

Contacts

Primary ContactCheng-Shuan Chung
chungchenshuan@gmail.com+886 910667236

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026