Skip to content

Neurobehavioral Profiles of Adaptive Stress Responses in Individuals With Alcohol Use Disorder

Towards Neurobehavioral Profiles and Models of Adaptive Stress Responses and Resilience in Individuals With Alcohol Use Disorder

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06105853
Acronym
A03
Enrollment
100
Registered
2023-10-30
Start date
2023-12-01
Completion date
2027-06-30
Last updated
2025-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Addiction, Alcohol, Alcohol Use Disorder, Craving, Relapse, Risk Behavior, Social Stress, Stress Reaction

Keywords

stress, resilience, craving, sensitization, habituation, cortisol, ecological momentary assessment, alcohol use disorder

Brief summary

The goal of this observational study is to investigate longitudinal stress response profiles and adaptive versus non-adaptive stress responses in alcohol use disorder. The main questions the projects aims to answer are: What are the neurobehavioral underpinnings of adaptive stress responses and resilience to repeated stress exposure with regards to: * alcohol craving? * alcohol use? * their modulation by prior stress exposure, social interactions, coping strategies and individual health behavior? Participants will: * be exposed to an established experimental stress-induction protocol, the Trier Social Stress Test * be exposed to their favorite drink in a bar lab environment * be assessed using fMRI to determine their neural alcohol cue reactivity, response inhibition, and emotion processing * conduct an ambulatory phase to assess stressors, alcohol craving, substance use and details on social interactions, health behavior and coping strategies using ecological momentary assessment tools.

Detailed description

The main objective of the study is to identify longitudinal profiles and models of adaptive stress responses and stress resilience in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and understand how stress and different responses to it influence alcohol craving and alcohol use trajectories over time. To achieve these goals, the investigators will examine habituation vs. sensitization of cortisol responses to repeated experimental stress exposure in individuals with AUD, as an established experimental model to studying adaptive vs. non-adaptive stress responses in the framework of an experimental set-up including an initial rest period (30 minutes), followed by the Trier Social Stress Test (15 minutes), exposure to the favorite drink in a bar environment (9 minutes) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (75 minutes) assessing A) neural alcohol cue-reactivity, B) inhibition performance during a Stop Signal Task, C) emotion processing during a face-matching task and D) resting state connectivity. The investigators also seek to characterize the neurobehavioral underpinnings of sensitized vs. habituated responses to repeated stress exposure, using an established alcohol cue-reactivity fMRI paradigm, and determine the impact of sensitized vs. habituated stress responses on physiological and subjective stress markers, alcohol craving, alcohol use, as well as their modulation by prior stress exposure, social support, drinking goals and individual health behavior with a focus on potentially modifiable factors that could serve as targets for future ecological momentary interventions. This setup will be repeated on a second examination day. In addition, the investigators aim to assess whether the observed habituation vs. sensitization phenotypes to repeated stress exposure translate into everyday-life of the respective individual and predict adaptive vs. non-adaptive stress responses. To this end, the investigators will acquire ambulatory assessments with high temporal resolution over six weeks, including detailed mapping of exposure to micro- and macro-stressors, drinking motifs, alcohol craving, alcohol use and data on factors that potentially modify the association between stress and alcohol use, such as social interactions, stress coping strategies, drinking goals and individual health behavior (e.g., sleep, physical activity) to assess whether the observed habituation vs. sensitization phenotypes to repeated stress exposure translate into everyday-life of the respective individual and predict real-life stress responses and alcohol use. Study flow: Screening (telephone): Assessing study eligibility Experimental study visit 1: Rest period (30 minutes) - Trier Social Stress Test (15 minutes) - Alcohol cue exposure (9 minutes) - fMRI (75 minutes) Experimental study visit 2: Repetition of setup from 'experimental study visit 1' Following six weeks: Ambulatory phase (smartphone tool) with daily requests regarding stressors, alcohol craving and consumption as well as health behavior

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTrier Social Stress Test

Test to induce high levels of acute social stress, including actors, representing the judging panel, and a faked exam situation (15 minutes duration).

BEHAVIORALBarlab Cue-Exposure

Participants are exposed to a bar situation with their individual favorite alcohol presented. They handle their favorite alcoholic drink and water (9 minutes duration).

BEHAVIORALFunctional magnetic resonance imaging

Participants undergo a fMRI screening including three different behavioral tasks assessing alcohol cue reactivity, response inhibition, and emotion processing

Sponsors

Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

* longitudinal * multimodal * interventional

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

are: * age between 16 and 65 years * meeting at least 2 criteria of an alcohol use disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) (DSM-5), yet without the need for a therapeutic intervention * fluency in German * able to understand the study procedures and give informed consent * willingness to use a study smartphone

Exclusion criteria

are: * current use of drugs or medications that interact with the central nervous system or the glucocorticoid system * contraindications for magnetic resonance imaging * medical history of bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder, schizophrenia or schizophrenic spectrum disorder, or substance use disorder other than alcohol, nicotine, or cannabis * medical history of severe head injury or other severe central nervous system disorders or other severe somatic disorders (e.g. liver cirrhosis) * pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ecological momentary assessmentstarting at the examination day until 6 weeks later; daily requestsSelf-report ratings of: Real-life alcohol craving with the item How strong is your current alcohol craving?, rating with a 7-Point-Likert-Scale from 1 no craving to 7 extreme craving; of stress exposure with the item How strong is your current level of stress?, rating with a 7-Point-Likert-Scale from 1 not at all to 7 very stressed; of alcohol consumption with the item Remember yesterday: Which and how many alcoholic drinks did you consume?, a short-list with listed drinks and amounts will open from which participants can choose; and of stress coping with the item How did you deal with unpleasant situations since the last prompt?, rating with a 5-Point-Likert-Scale from 1 not at all to 5 excellent
CortisolAssessed at 4 time points at each examination day: after a 30-minute rest period [0:30 hours]; after the 15-minute stress intervention [0:45 hours]; after the 9-minute Barlab exposure [0:54 hours]; after the 75-minute fMRI [2:09 hours]Cortisol levels measured in saliva as a stress marker (in nmol/l)
Alcohol urgesAssessed at 4 time points at each examination day: after a 30-minute rest period [0:30 hours]; after the 15-minute stress intervention [0:45 hours], after the 9-minute Barlab exposure [0:54 hours]; after the 75-minute fMRI [2:09 hours]self-report questionnaire: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) with Bohn et al. 1995; containing 8 items; each item will be rated on a 7-point-Likert-Scale from 1 not true at all (minimum) to 7 completely true (maximum); sum score is defined as outcome and higher outcome reflects higher alcohol urges
Alcohol cravingAssessed at 4 time points at each examination day: after a 30-minute rest period [0:30 hours]; after the 15-minute stress intervention [0:45 hours]; after the 9-minute Barlab exposure [0:54 hours]; after the 75-minute fMRI [2:09 hours]self-report How strong is your craving for alcohol?; containing 1 item; reported on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (no craving) to 100 (very strong craving)
Subjective stress levelAssessed at 4 time points at each examination day: after a 30-minute rest period [0:30 hours]; after the 15-minute stress intervention [0:45 hours]; after the 9-minute Barlab exposure [0:54 hours]; after the 75-minute fMRI [2:09 hours]self-report questionnaire: Primary Appraisal Secondary Appraisal (PASA); Gaab, 2009; containing 16 items; each item will be rated on a 6-Point-Scale from 1 (completely wrong) to 6 (quite right); sum score is defined as outcome and higher outcome reflects a higher subjective stress level
Neural alcohol-related cue-reactivityat examination day: after 1:00 hour of the experimental procedurepercent signal change from baseline condition (i.e. fixation cross), measured with fMRI; paradigm Vollstädt-Klein et al. 2010; \[percent signal change is not a change over time; it is measured during one experimental session\]; presentation of neutral and alcoholic (categories: beer, wine, spirits) stimuli in 20 blocks (blocked design; one block à 5 stimuli each presented for 4 seconds), after each block participants had to rate their craving: I have alcohol craving. from 0 (no craving at all) to 100 (severe craving), maximum rating duration is 10 seconds, following the rating a fixation cross was presented (10 seconds), total task duration: 12 minutes
Neural inhibition processingat examination day: after 1:00 hour of the experimental procedurepercent signal change from baseline condition (i.e. fixation cross), measured with fMRI; stop-signal reaction time task (Fauth-Buhler et al. 2012) \[percent signal change is not a change over time; it is measured during one experimental session\]; conduction of a stop-signal task of 600 trials (500 go-trials and 100 stop trials, participant have to respond as quickly as possible by pressing the left or right button according to the arrow direction, between the trials a fixation cross was presented (for 700 milliseconds to 1100 milliseconds), total task duration: 19 minutes
Neural emotion processingat examination day: after 1:00 hour of the experimental procedurepercent signal change from baseline condition (i.e. fixation cross), measured with fMRI; faces task (Hariri et al. 2002) \[percent signal change is not a change over time; it is measured during one experimental session\]; participants were exposed to faces with varying emotions and forms (geometric shapes as a sensorimotor control task) and had to match one of two simultaneously presented images with an identical target image, a total of nine blocks (four with faces, five controls) each lasting 32 seconds and a total duration of about five minutes
Resting state activityat examination day: after 1:00 hour of the experimental procedureresting state connectivity measured with fMRI

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood pressure (systolic and diastolic)Assessed at 4 time points at each examination day: after a 30-minute rest period [0:30 hours]; after the 15-minute stress intervention [0:45 hours]; after the 9-minute Barlab exposure [0:54 hours]; after the 75-minute fMRI [2:09 hours]acquired with pressure sleeve (in mmHg)

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactPatrick Bach, MD, PhD
patrick.bach@zi-mannheim.de+49 621 1703
Backup ContactJudith Zaiser
judith.zaiser@zi-mannheim.de+49 621 1703

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026