Skip to content

Effects of Aerobic Blood Flow Restriction

Effect of Aerobic Blood Flow Restriction Training in Academy Football Players: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06105697
Enrollment
20
Registered
2023-10-30
Start date
2023-10-01
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2024-10-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aerobic Exercise, Blood Flow Restriction Therapy

Keywords

Blood Flow Restriction, Aerobic Capacity, Soccer, Repeat Sprint Ability, Countermovement Jump

Brief summary

The aim is to evaluate the effects of aerobic blood flow restriction on academy football players. Randomized clinical trial, with two intervention groups: Experimental group I will carry out training based on running on the treadmill using blood flow restriction (BFR) on match days 4 and 3 pre-competition (MD-4, MD-3). On the other hand, the Experimental II group will perform the same training without the use of BFR for 6 weeks. The study will be carried out during the 2023-2024 season in the National and Youth Honor Divisions of Spanish soccer, with soccer teams from Mallorca Island. Before and after 6 weeks of intervention, the countermovement jump (CMJ), maximum aerobic speed (MAS), VO2max, and repeat sprint ability will be evaluated. The levels of muscle soreness (DOMS) will be evaluated at MD-4, MD-3, and MD-2. The same procedure will be carried out to evaluate muscle fatigue, sleep quality, and stress through a questionnaire. Sociodemographic and anthropometric data will be collected before starting the study. In addition, the rate of exertion perceived will be evaluated at MD-4, MD-3, and MD-2.

Detailed description

The warm-up will consist of federation Internationale football association (FIFA) 11+. In addition, the warm-up will contain a familiarization with the jump test.

Interventions

OTHERBlood flow restriction Running on Treadmill

Soccer players included in experimental group I will carry out this program for 6 weeks, setting the blood pressure to \ 60% of limb occlusion pressure (AOP). They will run for 4 sets of 5 minutes, separated by 1 minute of rest, at 50-60% of their maximum Aerobic Speed.

OTHERRunning on Treadmill

Soccer players included in experimental group II will carry out the program for 6 weeks without occlude the blood pressure. They will run for 4 sets of 5 minutes, separated by 1 minute of rest, at 50-60% of their maximum Aerobic Speed.

Sponsors

University of the Balearic Islands
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
15 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\-

Exclusion criteria

* No injuries players

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline in Countermovement Jump (CMJ)Change from Baseline in countermovement Jump (CMJ Test) at 6 weeksCMJ Test measured by Force Platform (Vald Performance, Brisbane, Australia)
Change from Baseline in Treadmill Incremental TestChange from Baseline in Maximum Aerobic Speed at 6 WeeksMaximum Aerobic Speed (MAS) measured by the Treadmill Incremental test
Change from Baseline in Repeat Sprint AbilityChange from Baseline in Repeat Sprint Ability at 6 WeeksRepeat Sprint Ability measured by the Bangsbo Test
Change from Baseline In Yoyo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1Change from Baseline in Yoyo Intermittent Recovery Level 1 at 6 WeeksVo2max Indirect measured by the Yoyo Intermittent Recovery Test Level I

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline in StressChange from Baseline in Stress at Match Day -4 (MD-4), MD-3, MD-2 during the 6 Weeks´ InterventionStress measured by a Wellness Questionary (1=Highly stressed; 2=Feeling stressed; 3=Normal; 4=Relaxed; 5=Very relaxed)
Change from Baseline in Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE)Change from Baseline in RPE at Match Day -4 (MD-4), MD-3, MD-2 during the 6 Weeks´ InterventionRating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) measured by Borg scale (0=Rest; 1=Really easy; 2=easy; 3=moderate; 4=sort of hard; 5=hard; 6=hard; 7=Really hard; 8= Really hard; 9= Really, really, hard; 10= Maximal)
Change from Baseline in MoodChange from Baseline in Stress at Match Day -4 (MD-4), MD-3, MD-2 during the 6 Weeks´ InterventionMood measured by a Wellness Questionary (1=Highly annoyed / irritable / down; 2=Snappy with team-mates, family and friends; 3=Less interested in others / activities; 4=Generally good mood; 5=Very positive mood)
Change from Baseline in FatigueChange from Baseline in Fatigue at Match Day -4 (MD-4), MD-3, MD-2 during the 6 Weeks´ InterventionFatigue measured by a Wellness Questionary (1= Always tired; 2=More tired than normal; 3=Normal; 4= Fresh; 5= Very fresh)
Change from Baseline in Muscle SorenessChange from Baseline in Muscle Soreness at Match Day -4 (MD-4), MD-3, MD-2 during the 6 Weeks´ InterventionMuscle Soreness measured by a Wellness Questionary (1=Very sore; 2= Increase in soreness/ tightness; 3=Normal; 4=Feeling good; 5=Feeling great)
Change from Baseline in Sleep QualityChange from Baseline in Sleep Quality at Match Day -4 (MD-4), MD-3, MD-2 during the 6 Weeks´ InterventionSleep Quality measured by a Wellness Questionary (1=Insomnia; 2=Restless sleep; 3=Difficulty falling asleep; 4=good; 5=Very restful)

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026