Skip to content

Periodontal Regeneration With Hyaluronic Acid or Enamel Matrix Derivatives

Minimally Invasive Periodontal Regeneration With a Combination Approach Using Either Hyaluronic Acid or Enamel Matrix Derivatives: a 24-month Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06105112
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-10-27
Start date
2023-10-01
Completion date
2026-10-01
Last updated
2023-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periodontitis

Brief summary

To date, the quest for ideal biological inductors for periodontal regeneration is still ongoing, especially when facing non-containing defect anatomies. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic performance of a bone graft combined with either enamel matrix derivatives or hyaluronic acid for periodontal regeneration of non-containing intrabony defects in terms of clinical attachment gain (primary outcome) and other secondary outcomes (probing pocket depth reduction, radiographic bone fill). Moreover, this study aims to compare early wound healing and patient-reported outcome measures.

Interventions

DEVICEHyaluronic acid

Minimally invasive flap elevation and debridement of the intrabony defect with micro-curettes. Root surface debridement with ultrasonic debridement with periotip and mini-curettes. Application of cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel composed of a mixture of cross-linked (1.6%) and natural (0.2%) hyaluronic acid (hyaDent BG, Regedent, Germany) through a syringe over a bone xenograft (Smartgraft, Regedent, Germany). The mixture will be then compacted within the intrabony component of the defect.

Minimally invasive flap elevation and debridement of the intrabony defect with micro-curettes. Root surface debridement with ultrasonic debridement with periotip and mini-curettes. Enamel matrix derivatives gel (Emdogain, Straumann, Switzerland) will be applied on the dry root surfaces and left in place for at least 1 minute avoiding blood contamination. Subsequently, a bone xenograft (Smartgraft, Regedent, Germany) will be compacted within the intrabony component of the defect.

Sponsors

University of Turin, Italy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of stage III-IV periodontitis. * Completed steps I-II periodontal therapy. * FMPS \<15% at 3-month re-evaluation. * FMBS \<15% at 3-month re-evaluation. * At least one site with intrabony defects and residual PPD ≥ 6 mm at re-evaluation, with a radiographic intrabony component ≥ 3 mm, and limited to no extension of the defect on the lingual or palatal side as assessed by preoperative bone sounding. * Intrasurgically, the defect has to present a non-supporting anatomy (1-2 residual walls in its most coronal portion) and it needs to be accessible by flap elevation only on one side (either buccal or oral). * Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Compromised general health which contraindicates the study procedures (ASA III-VI patients). * Systemic diseases/medications which could influence the outcome of the therapy (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, non-plaque-induced gingival diseases, antiepileptic drugs (phenytoin and sodium valproate), certain calcium channel-blocking drugs (e.g., nifedipine, verapamil, diltiazem, amlodipine, felodipine), immunoregulating drugs (e.g., ciclosporine), and high-dose oral contraceptives). * Current smokers (self-reported, ≥ 10 cigarettes a day), users of chewing tobacco, and drug/alcohol abusers. * Pregnant or nursing women. * Presence of furcation involvement ≥ II degree (Hamp 1975) at the affected teeth.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical attachment level change24 monthsClinical attachment level will be assessed on the experimental teeth using periodontal probe (PCP 15/11.5, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Probing pocket depth change24 monthsProbing depth will be assessed on the experimental teeth using periodontal probe (PCP 15/11.5, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA)
Radiographic bone level change24 monthsPeriapical standardized radiographs will be taken by a clinician masked to the clinical measurements using the paralleling technique and individually customized bite-blocks (RINN XCP Film Holding Instruments, Dentsply, York, USA)
Patient reported outcome measures14 weeksPain will be self-recorded by the patient using a visual analog scale (from 0 to 10)

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactMario Aimetti, PA
mario.aimetti@unito.it011 6331546

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026