Birth
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to determine the effect of SIMULATION-BASED EMERGENCY BREX BIRTH MANAGEMENT TRAINING IMPACT ON STUDENTS' SELF-CONFIDENCE AND COMPETENCE.
Detailed description
Hypotheses H01; There was no difference between the students'self-confidence and competence of the simulation-based emergency brex birth management training group and students'self-confidence and competence score control group. The study will be carried out in two different groups. The practice will start with meeting the students who apply to the study. After the students are evaluated in terms of eligibility criteria for the research, the students who are eligible will be informed about the research and written informed consent will be obtained from the women who accept. The random distribution of women to the study groups will be carried out using the Block Randomization method. The following applications will be made to the groups. Breech birth management training will be given by the responsible investigator, and then one of the groups separated by randomization will perform emergency breech birth on the second group model using High Reality Simulator. These trainings will first be in the form of the instructor responsible for the groups demonstrating the application, and then the students will apply it one by one.
Interventions
Using High Reality Simulator will perform emergency breech birth.
Sponsors
Ondokuz Mayıs University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Intervention model description
parallel
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
\- Agreeing to participate in the research and obtaining written permission,
Exclusion criteria
\-
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Confidence/Efficacy Scale in Patient Intervention | immediately before simulation and immediately after the training 2 months later | It was developed by Jekins in America in 1983 for nursing students. The scale is used to describe students' perceptions of clinical decision-making based on their own statements (Jenkins, 2001).It was adapted into Turkish by Durmaz-Edeer and Sarıkaya (2015). The sub-dimensions of the scale, which consists of 40 items and four sub-dimensions; Exploring options and ideas, Inquiring into goals and values, Evaluating consequences, and Searching for information and impartially adopting new information. Each subscale consists of 10 items. The total score of the scale is between 40 and 200, and each subscale is scored between 10 and 50. There is no cutoff point on the scale. A high score from the scale indicates that the perception of decision-making is high, and a low score indicates that the perception of decision-making is low.The scale is evaluated based on each subscale and scale total score (Jenkins, 2001). |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed