Cluster C Personality Disorder (Diagnosis), Mother-Child Relations
Conditions
Keywords
Group Schematherapy, Mother-child attachment, Effectiviness
Brief summary
The birth of a baby can be a stressful period. Dysfunctional schemas of the 'new' parent can be triggered making it more difficult to discern what the baby needs are. In schema therapy terms, mentalizing capacity is best described as the healthy adult mode. A parent who responds to her baby from a healthy adult mode provides the baby a safe environment for self-development. However, interpreting the baby's signals can be a constant challenge for some parents. This can trigger early attachment relationships and schemas. At such times, the parent may become overwhelmed by their own emotions and respond less adequate to the child's needs. Distorted parental reflective functioning is associated both with insecure attachment and poor affect regulation in the parent and with various psychological disorders in the child. Treatments aimed at improving parental reflectiveness seem to have a positive impact on the quality of the attachment between parents and their baby. The objective of this study is to measure the effects of the group-schematherapy for mothers with young children (GST moms) on mother-child attachment relations. The aim is to help moms regulate their own emotions, by understanding their own modes and schema's. In doing so will help them feel more confident to mentalize about their child and to adequately respond to their needs and emotionally bond with their baby. The researchers anticipate it will improve the quality of attachment between mother and child. Many studies have been done on the effectiveness of group schematherapy however there are no studies specifically for schematherapy for parents, in this case mothers. GST moms can be an early intervention aimed at prevention of psychological problems with the child.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALGroup schematherapy
Brief group schematherapy for mothers with young children (age 0-5) focused on attachment relations between mother and child
Sponsors
Psychologiepraktijk Esra
Maastricht University
Study design
Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Eligible patients for the group schematherapy are mothers with young children (0-5 years), with a cluster C personality disorder.
Exclusion criteria
* Acute Suicidal or chronic suicidality * Psychotic disorder * Autistic spectrum disorder * Bipolar disorder * Developmental disorders * Any other AS-I disorder that requires treatment first (severe depression, alcohol and/or drugs abuse) * Cluster A or B personality disorders (traits of cluster B in combination with Cluster C personality disorder is included) * Neuropsychological damage * General problems for group therapy (auditory impairment, severe physical disability, insufficant Dutch comprehension, IQ \< 80) * Self-mutilation
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The Maternal Postnatal attachment Scale (MPAS, 2015) | Inclusion (week 1), start therapy (variable; at least 20 weeks after inclusion), evaluation (week 10), end of group therapy (week 20), follow-up (3 months completion = week 20) | A 19 item self-report questionnaire that is used to assess mother-to-infant attachment (theemotional bond or affection experienced by the parent towards the infant) |
| The Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ, 2009) | Inclusion (week 1), start therapy (variable; at least 20 weeks after inclusion), evaluation (week 10), end of group therapy (week 20), follow-up (3 months completion = week 20) | A self-report instrument of reflective functioning. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The Schema Mode Inventory (SMI, Lobbestael, 2017) | Inclusion (week 1), start therapy (variable; at least 20 weeks after inclusion), evaluation (week 10), end of group therapy (week 20), follow-up (3 months completion = week 20) | To asses schema modes (118 items) |
| The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck et al., 1996) | Inclusion (week 1), start therapy (variable; at least 20 weeks after inclusion), evaluation (week 10), end of group therapy (week 20), follow-up (3 months completion = week 20) | A self-report questionnaire of depressive symptoms. |
| Brief Sympthom Inventory (BSI, Derogatis, 1975, de Beurs, 2006) | Inclusion (week 1), start therapy (variable; at least 20 weeks after inclusion), evaluation (week 10), end of group therapy (week 20), follow-up (3 months completion = week 20) | A self-report questionnaire to evaluate a broad range of psychological problems and symptoms of psychopathology. |
| The Young Schema Questionnaire YSQ-S3 (YSQ-S3; Young, 1994). | Inclusion (week 1), start therapy (variable; at least 20 weeks after inclusion), evaluation (week 10), end of group therapy (week 20), follow-up (3 months completion = week 20) | De Young Schema Questionnaire is a self-report instrument to assess 18 dysfunctional schemas and consists of 90 items |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The Working Model of the child interview (WMCI; Zeanah, Benoit & Barton, 1996) | Inclusion Week 1 | The WMCI is a semistructured interview to asses the internal representations of their child and relationship with the child. |
| The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ; Bernstein, 1994) | Inclusion Week 1 | A self report measure to identify diffent types of childhood trauma and abuse. |
Contacts
Primary ContactJeffrey Roelofs, PhD
Backup ContactEsra Schuiling-Kayihan, MSc
Outcome results
None listed