Skip to content

Relevance and Efficiency of SecOnd Line Workup for Uveitis

Relevance and Efficiency of SecOnd Line Workup for Uveitis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06102408
Acronym
RESOLVE
Enrollment
300
Registered
2023-10-26
Start date
2023-11-15
Completion date
2023-12-25
Last updated
2023-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Uveitis

Brief summary

The first-line etiological workup is currently poorly codified, and some patients undergo sequential investigations. However, the reason which lead the clinician to perform subsequent exams, and the relevance of such exams, remain to be determined. The main objective of the study was to assess the relevance of a second-line workup of patients with uveitis.

Detailed description

The first-line etiological workup is currently poorly codified, with some patients undergoing extensive investigations, and other minimal etiological workup. In addition, some patients undergo sequential investigations. However, the reason which lead the clinician to perform subsequent exams, and the relevance of investigations performed after a first line workup remain to be determined. The main objective of the study was to assess the relevance of a second-line workup of patients with uveitis.Secondary objectives were to describe the reasons of these second-line workups, and to determine which exams were the most relevant, and the determinants of its realization.

Interventions

OTHERsecond line investigations for uveitis etiological workup

Biological, radiological or histological investigations performed after a first line etiological workup. Investigations conducted following abnormal resultats of first line exams were not considered as second line exams (e.g. : bronchoscopy performed after abrnomal CT scan).

Sponsors

Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patient * at least one etiological workup in our center

Exclusion criteria

* only episode of acute anterior uveitis quickly responding to topical treatments * diagnostic ophthalmologically obvious * opposition to collection of data

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
patients undergoing a second line etiological workupthrough study completion, an average of 18 monthspercentage of patients undergoing a second line etiological workup

Contacts

Primary ContactThomas Moulinet, MD
t.moulinet@chru-nancy.fr+3383155304

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026