Skip to content

Long-term Results of Two Surgical Methods for Scleral IOL Implantation and Fixation in Eyes Without Capsular Support: Yamane- Versus 4-flanged Technique

Long-term Results of Two Surgical Methods for Scleral IOL Implantation and Fixation in Eyes Without Capsular Support: Yamane- Versus 4-flanged Technique

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06102109
Acronym
YAMPOINT
Enrollment
100
Registered
2023-10-26
Start date
2023-09-19
Completion date
2028-09-30
Last updated
2023-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aphakia - No Lens Capsule, IOL Opacification, IOL Subluxation, Lens Luxation

Keywords

Scleral fixated IOL, Yamane, 4 flanged technique

Brief summary

This study is a comparison of the surgical techniques and postoperative outcome between the two intrascleral IOL fixation techniques: Yamane technique versus the 4-flanged technique. The main objectives are postoperative lens tilt, duration of surgery, intra- and postoperative complication rates and scleral integrity around the flanges.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPars plana vitrectomy

25gauge pars plana vitrectomy: to remove the vitreous if present

PROCEDUREIOL explantation

Removing if present a subluxated IOL from the anterior chamber or the vitreous cavity

PROCEDUREScleral IOL fixation Yamane Technique

Scleral IOL fixation using the Yamane technique. A 3 piece IOL (Kowa Avansee Preset) gets fixated in the sclera using only its haptics, which are externalised 2.5mm behind the blue line. The haptic ends are flanged using a thermo cautery to prevent slipping back in.

PROCEDUREScleral IOL fixation 4-flanged Technique

Scleral IOL fixation using the 4 flanged technique. A 4 loop haptic IOL (Physical Micropure 123) gets fixated in the sclera using one 6.0 polypropylene suture per 2 haptic loops, which are put trough the loops in a W shape. The suture ends are externalised 2.5mm behind the blue line and its ends are flanged using a thermo cautery to prevent slipping back in.

Sponsors

Medical University of Vienna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \- Necessity for IOL (re)fixation in the absence of capsular support * willing to give informed consent and follow-up the duration of study

Exclusion criteria

* Anatomical or other contraindications for suture less IOL fixation, such as presence of a trabeculectomy bleb or scleromalacia * active inflammatory diseases of the eye

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
IOL tilt3 yearsThe postoperative intra ocular lens tilt in degree measured by an anterior segment optical coherence tomography device (Casia 2, Tommy, Japan)
IOL decentration3 yearsThe postoperative intra ocular lens decentration in millimetres measured by an anterior segment optical coherence tomography device (Casia 2, Tommy, Japan)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Best corrected visual outcome12 weeksThe achieved best corrected visual (in Snellen) outcome after Intraocular lens implantation
Flange erosion and intrusion3 yearsRisks of flange erosion trough the conjuctiva or intrusion through the sclera over the investigated time period

Countries

Austria

Contacts

Primary ContactMarkus Schranz, Md
markus.schranz@meduniwien.ac.at+4314040079690

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026