Skip to content

Mirror Therapy in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I

Mirror Visual Feedback as Therapeutic Modality in Unilateral Upper Extremity Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06100107
Enrollment
27
Registered
2023-10-25
Start date
2013-09-09
Completion date
2016-01-15
Last updated
2023-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I

Brief summary

The aim is to evaluate the efficacy of Mirror Therapy on pain reduction and hand function in subjects with unilateral upper extremity Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I.

Detailed description

Subjects were randomly divided into two groups. Group A carried out a ten-minute Mirror Therapy exercise daily, for a total duration of six weeks. Group B acted as a control group for six weeks followed by six weeks of Mirror Therapy with the same characteristics as Group A. Upper extremity active range of motion, strength, dexterity, limb volume, right-left temperature difference, and health-related quality of life were evaluated before and after each period. Daily records on the visual analogue scale were used for pain evaluation. Effectiveness was calculated using mixed-effects modelling for between-group comparisons and within-group variability and identifying significant predictors.

Interventions

OTHERMirror Therapy exercise

Mirror Therapy for the upper limb involves the use of a mirror to create a reflected image of the unaffected arm, making it appear as if both arms are moving symmetrically. During the therapy, the patient places their affected arm behind the mirror and their unaffected arm in front. While focusing on the mirror reflection, the patient performs various movements with the unaffected arm, giving the illusion that the affected arm is moving normally.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Motol
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Specifically, the study employs a half cross-over design. Group A begins with the intervention, while Group B starts with a control period of equal length, followed by the intervention. This design facilitates comparisons both between the groups and within Group B across the two periods.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- diagnosis of CRPS I based on the Budapest criteria

Exclusion criteria

* failure to meet the diagnostic Budapest clinical criteria for CRPS I * previous use of Mirror Therapy prior to the commencement of this study * substantial difficulties in cooperation * a significant change to the subjects' treatment regimen, outside of the study design

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain perceptionRecordings performed every day from day 0 to day 42 (Group A) and from day 0 to day 84 (Group B); Follow-up on day 72 (Group A) and day 114 (Group B).The participants in both groups made daily accounts of their pain level using 10 cm long visual analog scale (VAS) at rest as well as typical pain level during hand movement.
Active Range of MotionOn day 0 (Group A, Group B); on day 42 (Group A, Group B); on day 84 (Group B)Three attributes were measured: maximal active range of wrist flexion and extension (°) determined with goniometer measuring the angle between forearm and metacarpal bones
StrengthOn day 0 (Group A, Group B); on day 42 (Group A, Group B); on day 84 (Group B)The outcome parameter is the highest pressure (bar) performed during one maximal grip.
DexterityOn day 0 (Group A, Group B); on day 42 (Group A, Group B); on day 84 (Group B)Dexterity was evaluated by using a nine-hole PegBoard. The time taken to complete this task was measured.
Volume of hand and forearmOn day 0 (Group A, Group B); on day 42 (Group A, Group B); on day 84 (Group B)The volumetric measurements are based on the principle of water displacement.
TemperatureOn day 0 (Group A, Group B); on day 42 (Group A, Group B); on day 84 (Group B)Temperature was measured bilaterally in the thenar area using an infrared thermometer.
Health-related Quality of LifeOn day 0 (Group A, Group B); on day 42 (Group A, Group B); on day 84 (Group B)Determined using the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Levels questionnaire. A range of 0-100% is used, where a higher score means a better outcome.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026