Skip to content

Sacral Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation Efficacy in Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Sacral Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation Efficacy in Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06099847
Enrollment
38
Registered
2023-10-25
Start date
2023-02-01
Completion date
2023-09-15
Last updated
2023-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

Keywords

transcutaneous electrical stimulation, chronic pelvic pain, sacral, randomized clinical trial

Brief summary

The goal of this interventional study is to test of efficacy of sacral Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation (TENS) in patients with chronic pelvic pain. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Is sacral transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) effective to reduce/relief pain in patients with chronic pelvic pain? 2. Is the effect of TENS comparable to sham stimulation therapy in patients with chronic pelvic pain?

Detailed description

Our study aiming to test the efficacy of sacral transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) intervention in patients with chronic pelvic pain. We aim to test the efficacy and compare it with sham stimulation therapy in chronic pelvic pain.

Interventions

DEVICESham TENS Stimulation

Sacral TENS device without appropriate electrical stimulation have been applied to directly the skin of sacral area.

DEVICESacral TENS Stimulation

Sacral TENS stimulation have been applied to directly the skin of sacral area.

Sponsors

Istanbul University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Only participants are blinded for the intervention. Care provider (physiotherapist), investigator (medical doctor, physiatrist) and outcomes assessor (medical doctor, physiatrist) are not blinded and they are know which intervention (TENS or sham stimulation) is provided to the patients.

Intervention model description

We aim to compare sacral TENS in patients with chronic pelvic pain and compare it with sham stimulation therapy.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female with chronic pelvic pain for ≥6 months * 18-65 years old * Visual Numeric Scale of Pain score ≥4/10 * Voluntarily participate to the study

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Having severe medical and/or psychiatric disorder * Malignancy * Chronic infection * Inflammatory musculoskeletal system disease * Skin infection in sacral/pelvic area * Having implanted neuromodulatory device (such as pacemaker or defibrillator) * Refusing to participate the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Numeric Scale of PainBaseline (Before Treatment), immediately After Treatment and 1 Month After TreatmentPatients with Chronic Pelvic Pain assessed their pain levels before, right after and 1 month after treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Pelvic Pain Impact QuestionnaireBaseline (Before Treatment), immediately After Treatment and 1 Month After TreatmentPatients with Chronic Pelvic Pain assessed pelvic pain impact before, right after and 1 month after treatment
Female Sexual Function IndexBaseline (Before Treatment), immediately After Treatment and 1 Month After TreatmentPatients with Chronic Pelvic Pain assessed their sexual functions before, right after and 1 month after treatment
Patient Satisfaction QuestionnaireImmediately After Treatment and 1 Month After TreatmentPatients with Chronic Pelvic Pain assessed their satisfaction levels right after and 1 month after treatment.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026