Skip to content

Evaluation of Concordance Between Exhaled Air Test (eBAM-CoV) and RT-PCR to Detect SARS-CoV-2

Evaluation of Concordance Between an Innovative Test on Exhaled Air (eBAM-CoV) and RT-PCR to Detect SARS-CoV-2 in Symptomatic Patients or Closed Contacts

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06099795
Acronym
eBAM_CoV
Enrollment
250
Registered
2023-10-25
Start date
2025-01-01
Completion date
2027-12-01
Last updated
2026-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Keywords

Diagnostic Test Kits

Brief summary

During the COVID-19 pandemic, testing primarily relied on the use of nasopharyngeal swabs to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus, responsible for the disease. However, this technique has several limitations, including the variable quality of swabs, its invasive nature, and arbitrariness in the choice of the number of cycles. Furthermore, it does not allow for the detection of viral proteins. To overcome these limitations, researchers developed the eBAM-CoV test, patented for the detection of viral proteins in the exhaled air of COVID-19 patients. This portable device provides an immediate assessment of the "viral load" with both quantitative and qualitative results, showing promise for early virus detection. The researchers hypothesize that the eBAM-CoV test is likely to exhibit a satisfactory concordance with the reference RT-PCR test in the detection of COVID-19, especially among symptomatic patients or closed contacts.

Interventions

DEVICEeBAM Cov Testing

Evaluation of presence/absence of infection with SARS-CoV-2 assessed by eBAM-CoV on air exhaled by the patient compared with the presence/absence of infection based on RT-PCR testing of nasopharyngeal swabs

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of Nimes
CollaboratorOTHER
brains' laboratory sas, FRANCE
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adult male or female patients over 18 years of age (≥) * Suspected of being infected with COVID-19 (symptomatic or contact case) and consulting for RT-PCR screening.

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to understand the procedures to use the device * Patient participating in an another interventional study * Patient in exclusion period determined by another study * Patient under court protection or guardianship * Patient/trusted person/legal representative/family member for whom it is impossible to give informed information. * Pregnant, parturient or breast-feeding patient

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Concordance between eBAM-Cov test and RT -PCR test to detect SARS-CoV -2 infectionDay 0Evaluate the performance of the eBAM-CoV test by measuring the concordance between the eBAM-CoV method and the reference RT-PCR method (known as the "gold standard") in detecting SARS-CoV-2 in subjects likely to be infected with COVID-19 (symptomatic or closed contacts).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
diagnostic performance of the eBAM-CoV testDay 0Preliminarily assess the diagnostic performance of the eBAM-CoV test by measuring the sensitivity/specificity between the eBAM-CoV method and the reference RT-PCR method (known as the "gold standard") for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in subjects likely to be infected with COVID-19 (symptomatic or closed contact).
concentration of SARS-CoV-2 viral proteinsDay 0Correlation between the concentration of SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins assessed by the eBAM-CoV test (eBAM-Unit) and the mean number of copies of mRNA encoding a protein fraction of SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins assessed using the RT-PCR technique
Early detection of SARS-CoV-2 using eBAM-CoV test versus RT-PCRDay 4Number of patients detected as positive by eBAM-CoV and negative by RT-PCR at Day 0 whose RT-PCR test becomes positive at Day 4
Concordance between eBAM-CoV test and antigenic testDay 0Concordance between the eBAM-CoV method and the antigenic test in patients likely to be infected with COVID-19 and volunteering for a second nasopharyngeal swab

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTValérie COMPAN, PhD
vcompan@brains4d.com+33664915140

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 28, 2026