Skip to content

Outcomes That Matter and Questionnaires for Older People With Frailty

Investigating Outcomes That Matter and the Suitability of PROMs for Older People Living With Frailty

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06099691
Enrollment
15
Registered
2023-10-25
Start date
2023-12-18
Completion date
2024-03-22
Last updated
2024-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Frailty

Keywords

Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Qualitative Research, Frailty, Health Priorities, Quality of Life

Brief summary

The goal of this qualitative study is to investigate what matters to older people living with frailty, and how this can be measured using questionnaires (Patient Reported Outcome Measures, or PROMs). The research questions are: 1. What outcomes matter to older adults living with frailty? 2. What are participants' perceptions of PROMs that could measure these outcomes? Our estimated sample will be 15 older adults, approximately 5 people living with mild frailty, 5 living with moderate frailty and 5 living with severe frailty. Participants will take part in one 90-minute interview.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALQualitative Interviews

Participants will take part in one 90-minute interview (or two 45-minute interviews if preferred). The interview will have two sections. The first section will include discussion of what matters to participants. The second section will introduce PROMs which may be pertinent to measuring what matters. The participants will be helped to reflect on their relevance and usefulness to them.

Sponsors

University of Exeter
CollaboratorOTHER
Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Over the age of 65 * Indication of frailty in one of the following ways: * Clinical diagnosis of frailty * Assessment of at least 4 on the Clinical Frailty Scale by a healthcare professional * Having mental capacity to consent to participate as defined under the Mental Capacity Act (2005). This will be assessed in the telephone conversation prior to the interview by a researcher who has received Mental Capacity training * Available to be interviewed by face-to-face interview at the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Exeter Clinical Research Facility or as a home visit, or as an online meeting

Exclusion criteria

* Not able to participate in face-to-face interview or use video call technology * Not assessed as frail * Not able to express thoughts and opinions in sufficient depth for analysis, even with facilitation by a relative or carer. This will be assessed in the telephone conversation with the researcher prior to the interview. * Lacking capacity to consent to participate as defined under the Mental Capacity Act (2005). An individual would be unable to participate if they cannot: * Understand the information relevant to the decision of participating * Retain that information * Use or weigh up that information as part of the process of deciding whether to participate * Communicate their decision to other people

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Identify outcomes that matter to older people with frailty6 monthsQualitative interviews will be conducted with older people living with frailty to identify what matters to people (e.g. managing pain, functional independence, suitability of medications, social support). This may vary at different severities of frailty.
Investigate perceptions of questionnaires6 monthsQualitative interviews will be conducted with older people living with frailty to investigate participants' perceptions of PROMs (questionnaires) that could measure outcomes that matter to them.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026