Skip to content

The Effect of Different Treatment Modalities of Class II Malocclusion on Upper Third Molars.

The Effect of Different Treatment Modalities of Class II Malocclusion on Upper Third Molars: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06098885
Enrollment
46
Registered
2023-10-25
Start date
2021-09-04
Completion date
2023-06-04
Last updated
2023-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Third Molar Impaction

Keywords

distalization, premolar extraction, upper third molar, impaction of third molar

Brief summary

What is the effect of the different treatment modalities (distalization versus upper premolar extraction) of class II malocclusion on the position, inclination and incidence of impaction of the upper third molars?

Detailed description

What is the effect of the different treatment modalities (distalization versus upper premolar extraction) of class II malocclusion on the position, inclination and incidence of impaction of the upper third molars? Pico P: Adolescent patients with class II malocclusion having bilateral developing upper third molars. I: bilateral upper first premolar extraction orthodontic treatment with moderate anchorage. C: distalization orthodontic treatment. O: Primary: angulation of the maxillary third molars.

Interventions

bilateral upper first premolar extraction orthodontic treatment with moderate anchorage.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adolescent males and females (16 -18 years) with Bilaterally developing maxillary third molars. Not more than two thirds of the root development of the third molars had taken place. * Class II malocclusion cases that were treated by 1) maxillary premolar extraction with a moderate anchorage requirement and achieved full unit class II molar relationship or 2) Distalization treatment plan and class I molar relationship was achieved. * Patients with high-quality pre- and post-treatment radiographs. * Normal or increased vertical dimension.

Exclusion criteria

* Maxillary Premolar extraction cases requiring maximum anchorage preparation. * Low vertical dimension. * Patients without dentofacial deformities, severe facial asymmetries, microdontia or hypodontia.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The angulation of the maxillary third molars.up to 24 weeks.the angle between the long axis of the third molar and the palatal plane

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The vertical position of the third molarsup to 24 weeksthe vertical position of the third molar relative to the second molar measured using Archer classification tool. (qualitative measure)
The mineralization status of the third molarsup to 24 weeksthe amount of calcified tissues of the third molar measured using Demirjian classification method

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026