Skip to content

Wrist Denervation Vs Exercise in Wrist Osteoarthritis

Partial Wrist Denervation Versus Self-managed Exercise Therapy in Patients with Wrist Osteoarthritis: a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06098586
Enrollment
140
Registered
2023-10-24
Start date
2023-11-15
Completion date
2027-11-15
Last updated
2025-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis Wrist

Brief summary

A randomized controlled trial comparing partial wrist denervation to a self-managed exercise therapy program in 140 patients with wrist osteoarthritis.

Detailed description

Backgroud: High quality evidence regarding the effectiveness of non-operative and operative treatments in wrist osteoarthritis are lacking. Aim: To analyze: 1. Does partial wrist denervation and self-managed exercise therapy improve patient-reported outcomes, pain, grip strength and range of motion (ROM) in wrist OA? 2. Is any of the two treatment concepts partial wrist denervation and self-managed exercise therapy more efficient than the other in terms of patient-reported outcomes, pain relief, grip strength and range of motion? Method: A multicenter parallel group, two-arm, randomized, controlled, assessor blinded, trial of 140 patients. The study is conducted at the departments of hand surgery at Södersjukhuset Stockholm and Malmö University hospital. Group1: Self-managed exercise therapy program containing: * Patient education: * Exercise therapy program: The exercise therapy program is designed by Sara Larsson (physiotherapist at the Department of hand surgery in Malmö, Sweden), influenced by previous studies on wrist stability and proprioception. Focus is on functional re-learning and strengthening of the musculoskeletal system with the aim to create a stable wrist that can be used in a pain-free manner in activities of daily living. The program consists of neuromuscular exercises that focus on coordination, wrist stability and strength. Group 2: Surgery will be performed under local anesthesia (+ blood-less field or wide-awake local anesthesia no torniquet (WALANT) according to the surgeon's preference) through a single dorsal incision. AIN and PIN neurectomy will be performed as described by Berger (Berger, 1998). Primary outcome: Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score (0-100) (MacDermid et al., 1998) 12 months after intervention.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSelf-managed exercise therapy program

Exercise program focusing on functional re-learning and strengthening of the musculoskeletal system with the aim to create a stable wrist that can be used in a pain-free manner in activities of daily living.

PROCEDUREPartial wrist denervation

AIN and PIN neurectomy through a dorsal approach as described by Berger (Berger, 1998).

Sponsors

Karolinska Institutet
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Data assessors and analysts will be masked for treatment allocation (covered wrist / anonymous data sheet).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years. * Chronic wrist pain (≥6 months) due to Scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) / Scaphoid non-union advanced collapse (SNAC) grade 1-3 osteoarthritis. * Radiological signs of osteoarthritis on posteroanterior and lateral radiograph.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous PIN or AIN neurectomy. * Rheumatoid arthritis or other chronic inflammatory arthritis. * Symptomatic osteoarthritis in the distal radio-ulnar (DRU), Scapho-trapezio-trapezoid (STT) or thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joints. * Ongoing infection. * Inability to co-operate with the follow-up protocol. * Systemic or intra-articular glucocorticoids or intraarticular PRP or Hyaluronic acid injections in the affected joint within 3 months prior to enrollment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PRWE6 monthsPatient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score (0-100 (high score worse outcome)) (MacDermid et al., 1998)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain NRS3 monthsPain at rest and on load measured by a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0-100 (higher score worse outcome) (Salaffi et al 2004)
EQ5D3 monthsEQ-5D-5L (0-1 (higher score better outcome)) (Brooks, 1996)
GROC3 monthsGlobal rating of change (GROC, -5-+5, higher score better outcome)
Pain catastrophizing3 monthsPCS (Pain catastrophizing scale, 0-52, higher score worse outcome) (Sullivan et al, 1995)
ROM3 monthsRange of motion (ROM) of the wrist.
Grip3 monthsGrip strength (Jamar).
PRWE3 monthsPatient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score (0-100 (high score worse outcome)) (MacDermid et al., 1998)
Radiology5 yearsRadiological grade of osteoarthritis 5 years after inclusion compared to baseline.
Cost12 monthsDifferences in direct costs associated with treatment and indirect costs.
sick leave12 monthslength of sick leave
work12 monthsability to return to previous work
Survival12 monthsSuccess of the intervention, i.e no additional surgery during the study period due to lack of treatment effect or recurrence of symptoms.
Complications3 monthsComplications related to treatment

Countries

Sweden

Contacts

Primary ContactElin Swärd, MD, PhD
elin.sward@regionstockholm.se+4612360000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026