Skip to content

A Trial to Learn if Odronextamab Combined With Chemotherapy is Safe and Well-Tolerated and How Well it Works Compared to Rituximab Combined With Chemotherapy for Adult Participants With Follicular Lymphoma

A Phase 3, Open-Label, Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Odronextamab (REGN1979), an Anti-CD20x Anti-CD3 Bispecific Antibody, Combined With Chemotherapy Versus Rituximab Combined With Chemotherapy in Previously Untreated Participants With Follicular Lymphoma (OLYMPIA-2)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06097364
Acronym
OLYMPIA-2
Enrollment
733
Registered
2023-10-24
Start date
2023-11-14
Completion date
2029-07-29
Last updated
2026-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Follicular Lymphoma (FL)

Keywords

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) FL, B-cells NHL (B-NHL), Untreated FL, Odronextamab

Brief summary

This study is researching an experimental drug called odronextamab, referred to as study drug. The study is focused on participants with previously untreated follicular lymphoma. Follicular lymphoma is a type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma or NHL. Participants with follicular lymphoma that has come back after treatment (called "relapsed") or did not respond to treatment (called "refractory") are eligible to take part only in Part 1A of the study. This study is made up of 3 parts: Part 1A (non-randomized), Part 1B and Part 2 (randomized - controlled). The aim of Part 1A and Part 1B of the study is to see how safe and tolerable the study drug in combination with chemotherapy is and to determine the dose and schedule of the study drug to be combined with chemotherapy to be used in Part 2 of the study. The aim of Part 2 of the study is to assess how effective the combination of the study drug with chemotherapy is in comparison with the combination of rituximab and chemotherapy (the current standard-of-care for NHL). Standard-of-care means the usual medication expected and used when receiving treatment for a condition. The study is looking at several other research questions, including: * What side effects may happen from taking the study drug * How much study drug is in the blood at different times * Whether the body makes antibodies against the study drug (which could make the study drug less effective or could lead to side effects) * The impact from the study drug on quality-of-life and ability to complete routine daily activities

Interventions

DRUGOdronextamab

Administered by intravenous (IV) infusion

DRUGRituximab

Administered by IV infusion, or subcutaneous (SC)

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Administered by IV infusion

DRUGDoxorubicin

Administered by IV infusion

DRUGVincristine

Administered by IV infusion

DRUGPrednisone/Prenisolone

Administered orally (PO)

Sponsors

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Have diagnosis of cluster of differentiation 20 positive (CD20+) FL grade 1-3a, stage II bulky or stage III / IV 1. For Part 1A: previously untreated participants who have Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI)-1 score of 3 to 5, or R/R FL 2. For Part 1B: previously untreated participants who have FLIPI-1 score of 3 to 5 3. For Part 2: previously untreated participants who have FLIPI-1 score of 0 to 5 2. Have measurable disease on cross sectional imaging documented by diagnostic computed tomography \[CT\], or magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\] imaging, as described in the protocol 3. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 4. Adequate bone marrow and hepatic function. Key

Exclusion criteria

1. Participants with central nervous system lymphoma or leptomeningeal lymphoma 2. Participants with histological evidence of transformation to a high-grade or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma 3. Participants with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma), grade 3b follicular lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma 4. Recent major surgery and history or organ transplantation 5. A malignancy other than NHL unless the participant is adequately and definitively treated and any other significant active disease or medical condition that could interfere with the conduct of the study or put the participant at significant risk, as described in the protocol. Note: Other protocol-defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) for odronextamab in combination with chemotherapyUp to 35 daysPart 1, DLT period
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of odronextamab in combination with chemotherapyUp to 2 yearsPart 1, Treatment period
Severity of TEAEs of odronextamab in combination with chemotherapyUp to 2 yearsPart 1, Treatment period
Complete Response rate at 30 months (CR30) assessed by independent central review (ICR)Up to 30 monthsPart 2

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Odronextamab concentrations in serum when administered with chemotherapyUp to 30 monthsPart 1, Maintenance period and Part 2, Induction period
Odronextamab concentrations in serum when administered as monotherapyUp to 30 monthsPart 1 and Part 2, Maintenance period
Incidence of anti-odronextamab antibodies (ADAs)Up to 30 monthsPart 1 and Part 2
Titers of ADAs to odronextamabUp to 30 monthsPart 1 and Part 2
Incidence of neutralizing antibodies (NAb) to odronextamabUp to 30 monthsPart 1 and Part 2
Best overall response (BOR) as assessed by the investigatorUp to 30 monthsPart 1, end of Induction period and end of Maintenance period
Progression free survival (PFS) as assessed by ICRUp to 5 yearsPart 2
CR30 as assessed by local investigatorUp to 30 monthsPart 2
Change in patient reported physical functioning scale scores on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Cancer-30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Up to 5 yearsPart 2 The EORTC QLQ-C30 includes 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting), a global health status (GHS)/QoL scale, and six single items (constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, shortness of breath, appetite loss and financial difficulties). For the functioning scales and global health status / QoL, scores range from 1 = "very poor" to 7 = "excellent" with higher scores indicate better functioning; for the symptom scales, scores range from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much" higher scores indicate higher symptom burden.
PFS as assessed by local investigatorUp to 5 yearsPart 2
Event-free survival (EFS) as assessed by ICRUp to 5 yearsPart 2
EFS as assessed by local investigatorUp to 5 yearsPart 2
Overall Survival (OS)Up to 5 yearsPart 2
BOR as assessed by local investigatorUp to 30 monthsPart 2
BOR as assessed by ICRUp to 30 monthsPart 2
Duration of response (DOR) assessed by ICRUp to 5 yearsPart 2
DOR as assessed by local investigatorUp to 5 yearsPart 2
Time to next anti-lymphoma treatment (TTNT)Up to 5 yearsPart 2
Incidence of TEAEsUp to 2 yearsPart 2
Severity of TEAEsUp to 2 yearsPart 2
Change in patient reported health related quality of life (HRQoL) as measured by EORTC-QLQ-C30Up to 5 yearsPart 2 The EORTC QLQ-C30 includes 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting), a GHS/QoL scale, and six single items (constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, shortness of breath, appetite loss and financial difficulties). For the functioning scales and global health status / QoL, scores range from 1 = "very poor" to 7 = "excellent" with higher scores indicate better functioning; for the symptom scales, scores range from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much" higher scores indicate higher symptom burden.
Change in cancer disease as measured by EORTC-QLQ-C30Up to 5 yearsPart 2 The EORTC QLQ-C30 includes 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting), a GHS/QoL scale, and six single items (constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, shortness of breath, appetite loss and financial difficulties). For the functioning scales and global health status / QoL, scores range from 1 = "very poor" to 7 = "excellent" with higher scores indicate better functioning; for the symptom scales, scores range from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much" higher scores indicate higher symptom burden.
Change in treatment related symptoms as measured by EORTC-QLQ-C30Up to 5 yearsPart 2 The EORTC QLQ-C30 includes 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting), a GHS/QoL scale, and six single items (constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, shortness of breath, appetite loss and financial difficulties). For the functioning scales and global health status / QoL, scores range from 1 = "very poor" to 7 = "excellent" with higher scores indicate better functioning; for the symptom scales, scores range from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much" higher scores indicate higher symptom burden.
Change in patient-reported lymphoma disease as measured by the Lymphoma Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma (FACT-LymS)Up to 5 yearsPart 2 The FACT-Lym lymphoma subscale (LymS) includes 15 items to assess NHL-related symptoms and concerns. All questions are answered on a 5-point scale ranging from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). Higher scores are associated with a worse quality of life.
Change in treatment-related symptoms as measured by the FACT-LymSUp to 5 yearsPart 2 The FACT-LymS includes 15 items to assess NHL-related symptoms and concerns. All questions are answered on a 5-point scale ranging from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). Higher scores are associated with a worse quality of life.
Change in patient-reported general health status per EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L)Up to 5 yearsPart 2 The EQ-5D-5L consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: "no problems", "slight problems", "moderate problems", "severe problems" and "extreme problems". The EQ VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labeled "Best imaginable health state" and "Worst imaginable health state".
Change in patient-reported treatment side effects burden per Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Global Population Item 5 (FACT-G GP5)Up to 5 yearsPart 2 A single item GP5 of the validated FACT-G questionnaire will be used to assess from the participant perspective the overall impact of treatment side-effect. The question item is on a 5-point scale ranging from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4).
Change in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)Up to 5 yearsPart 2 The PGIS includes a single-item to assess how a patient perceives the overall severity of cancer symptoms over the past 7 days. Patients will choose the response that best describes the severity of their overall cancer symptoms with options on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (No symptoms) to 4 (Very Severe).
Change in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Up to 5 yearsPart 2 The PGIC item includes a single-item to assess how a patient perceives their overall change in health status since the start of study treatment. Patients will choose from response options on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (Much Better) to 7 (Much worse); 1- Much Better, 2-Moderately Better, 3-A Little Better, 4-About the Same, 5-A Little Worse, 6-Moderately Worse, 7-Much Worse.
Change in score of the FACT-G GP5 item in the patient populationUp to 5 yearsPart 2 A single item GP5 of the validated FACT-G questionnaire will be used to assess from the participant perspective the overall impact of treatment side-effect. The question item is on a 5-point scale ranging from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4).

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Chile, Czechia, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Poland, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORClinical Trial Management

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026