Skip to content

Ambispective Study Evaluating the Clinical Results of SAGITTA EVL R Revision Stems

Ambispective Study Evaluating the Clinical Results of SAGITTA EVL R Revision Stems

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06096168
Acronym
2022-10
Enrollment
42
Registered
2023-10-23
Start date
2023-04-13
Completion date
2024-10-29
Last updated
2025-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Arthropathy

Keywords

Total Hip Prosthesis Revision

Brief summary

This clinical study is conducted to collect data on hip arthroplasty with the SAGITTA EVL-R revision femoral stems manufactured by SERF. In order to reflect current practice, a comprehensive and continuous series of patients will be included. This study will confirm the performance and safety of the SAGITTA EVL R revision femoral stems within the framework of MDR 2017/745 and in relation to the recommendations of the MEDDEV guide 2.7.1. Rev 4 (Clinical Evaluation Guide), which provides for a systematic procedure to monitor clinical data in order to verify the claimed performance of medical devices.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Societe dEtude, de Recherche et de Fabrication
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient over 18 years old at the time of surgery, * Patient implanted with a SAGITTA EVL R revision femoral stem within its indications between 01/01/2016 and 31/12/2018, * Affiliated to French health insurance system

Exclusion criteria

* Patient who has not expressed consent for data collection and participation in the study, * Patient unable to understand the surgeon's instructions or to perform postoperative follow-up. * Patient with a contraindication to the use of the SAGITTA EVL R revision femoral stem * Patient implanted with a SAGITTA EVL R revision femoral stem outside its indication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival Rate at Mid Term Follow-upBetween 4 to 7 years after surgeryAssess the survival rate, at least 4 year-follow-up, whatever the cause of revision. Cumulative survival rate expressed in percentage of implants not revised (remaining in place) using Kaplan Meier calculation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival Rates at Mid Term Follow-up (by Component)At 4/6 years after surgeryAssess the survival rates at least, 4 year-follow-up, whatever the cause of revision, regarding each component of the prothesis
Survival Rates at Mid Term Follow-up (by Etiology)At 4/6 years after surgeryAssess the survival rates at least, 4 year-follow-up, whatever the cause of revision, regarding etiology. Percentage of patients with implant in place dispatched following reason for implantation
Adverse EventsFrom per operative period to 4/6 years after surgeryList type and frequency of complications, investigated by clinical and radiological examination following investigator's usual practice
Oblivion of ProsthesisAt 4/6 years after surgeryAssess the degree of forgetfulness of the prosthesis using FJS-score (Forgotten Joint Score) : FJS stands for Forgotten Joint Score. The Forgotten Joint Score assessment consists of 12 questions and is scored on a 0-100 scale. The higher the score, the less the patient is aware of their affected joint when performing daily activities
Functional ImprovementAt 4/6 years after surgeryEvaluate pain, walking, limping and activities of daily life using Harris Hip Score : The global Harris Hip Score consists of a 0 to 100 points scale (100 points is the better outcome)
Patient's SatisfactionAt 4/6 years after surgeryAssessed by the surgeon through questionary with a 5 item-scale : very satisfied / satisfied / neither satisfied - nor unsatisfied / unsatisfied / very unsatisfied

Countries

France

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Per Protocol Population
All patients implanted with a SAGITTA EVLR revision stem in CHU Rouen between 2016 and 2018 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria
42
Per Protocol Population
All patients implanted with a SAGITTA EVLR revision stem in CHU Rouen between 2016 and 2018 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria
42
Total84

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath30
Overall StudyRevision2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPer Protocol Population
Age, Continuous80.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.24
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants
Weight72.8 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
30 / 42
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Survival Rate at Mid Term Follow-up

Assess the survival rate, at least 4 year-follow-up, whatever the cause of revision. Cumulative survival rate expressed in percentage of implants not revised (remaining in place) using Kaplan Meier calculation.

Time frame: Between 4 to 7 years after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Per Protocol PopulationSurvival Rate at Mid Term Follow-up90.1 percentage of implant survival
Secondary

Adverse Events

List type and frequency of complications, investigated by clinical and radiological examination following investigator's usual practice

Time frame: From per operative period to 4/6 years after surgery

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Per Protocol PopulationAdverse EventsSepsis1 participants
Per Protocol PopulationAdverse EventsGreater trochanter fracture1 participants
Per Protocol PopulationAdverse EventsPosterior dislocation - vicious attitude of the hip1 participants
Per Protocol PopulationAdverse EventsFemoral fracture1 participants
Per Protocol PopulationAdverse EventsFracture with greater trochanter displacement1 participants
Secondary

Functional Improvement

Evaluate pain, walking, limping and activities of daily life using Harris Hip Score : The global Harris Hip Score consists of a 0 to 100 points scale (100 points is the better outcome)

Time frame: At 4/6 years after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Per Protocol PopulationFunctional Improvement71.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.45
Secondary

Oblivion of Prosthesis

Assess the degree of forgetfulness of the prosthesis using FJS-score (Forgotten Joint Score) : FJS stands for Forgotten Joint Score. The Forgotten Joint Score assessment consists of 12 questions and is scored on a 0-100 scale. The higher the score, the less the patient is aware of their affected joint when performing daily activities

Time frame: At 4/6 years after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Per Protocol PopulationOblivion of Prosthesis80.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 10.15
Secondary

Patient's Satisfaction

Assessed by the surgeon through questionary with a 5 item-scale : very satisfied / satisfied / neither satisfied - nor unsatisfied / unsatisfied / very unsatisfied

Time frame: At 4/6 years after surgery

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Per Protocol PopulationPatient's SatisfactionRather satisfied4 number of hips
Per Protocol PopulationPatient's SatisfactionVery satisfied4 number of hips
Per Protocol PopulationPatient's SatisfactionNeither satisfied nor unsatisfied2 number of hips
Per Protocol PopulationPatient's SatisfactionRather unsatisfied0 number of hips
Per Protocol PopulationPatient's SatisfactionVery unsatisfied0 number of hips
Secondary

Survival Rates at Mid Term Follow-up (by Component)

Assess the survival rates at least, 4 year-follow-up, whatever the cause of revision, regarding each component of the prothesis

Time frame: At 4/6 years after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Per Protocol PopulationSurvival Rates at Mid Term Follow-up (by Component)100 percentage of implant survival
Secondary

Survival Rates at Mid Term Follow-up (by Etiology)

Assess the survival rates at least, 4 year-follow-up, whatever the cause of revision, regarding etiology. Percentage of patients with implant in place dispatched following reason for implantation

Time frame: At 4/6 years after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Per Protocol PopulationSurvival Rates at Mid Term Follow-up (by Etiology)80 percentage of implant

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026