Skip to content

A Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Aramchol Meglumine in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

A Proof of Concept, Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Aramchol Meglumine in Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06095986
Enrollment
0
Registered
2023-10-23
Start date
2025-06-30
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2025-06-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

Brief summary

The objectives of this study is to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Aramchol Meglumine in Patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

Detailed description

The objectives of this study are to: * Establish the safety and tolerability of once daily (QD) Aramchol meglumine in patients with PSC * Examine whether once daily (QD) Aramchol meglumine has any effect on serum alkaline phosphatase * Provide a comprehensive readout of clinical efficacy following once daily (QD) Aramchol meglumine administration

Interventions

Aramchol meglumine is derived from a weak acid (Aramchol) and an amino-sugar (meglumine)

Sponsors

Virginia Commonwealth University
CollaboratorOTHER
Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double-blind

Intervention model description

Parallel group analysis

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female age 18 years and above (inclusive at first screening visit) 2. Established diagnosis of large duct PSC based on abnormal cholangiography as assessed by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) 3. Alkaline phosphatase \> 150 IU/l 4. Stable inflammatory bowel disease therapy \> 3months for IBD patients 5. If receiving treatment with Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA; ursodiol), therapy is at a dose of \<20 mg/kg/day, has been stable for at least 6 months before screening 6. Ability to understand the nature of the study and to sign a written informed consent form (ICF)

Exclusion criteria

1. Other causes of liver disease, including secondary sclerosing cholangitis or viral, metabolic, or alcoholic liver disease, as assessed clinically 2. Active Crohn's disease (CDAI \> 40) or ulcerative colitis (Mayo IBD score \> 4) or active non-hemorrhoidal rectal bleeding 3. Small bowel resection \> 100 cm 4. Cirrhosis (clinically evident or by biopsy) 5. Prior hepatic decompensation event 6. Recent (\< 6 weeks) acute cholangitis or hospitalization for PSC or IBD 7. Bleeding diathesis or other contraindication for liver biopsy 8. Known GI or hepatobiliary malignancy 9. Prior liver transplantation 10. Prior exposure to study drug 11. Active untreated viral hepatitis or other concomitant liver disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline in serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP)48 weeksThe change from Baseline to Week 48 in ALP levels

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline in Enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF)48 weeksChange from Baseline to Week 48 in Enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test. Score below 7.7 indicate no to mild fibrosis, and score higher than 11.3 indicate cirrhosis.
Change from Baseline in MRCP48 weeksChange from Baseline to Week 48 in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)
Change from Baseline in quantitative liver function using Gadoxetate clearance48 weeksChange from Baseline to Week 48 in quantitative liver function using Gadoxetate clearance
Change from Baseline in 5D-itch scale48 weeksChange from Baseline to Week 48 in the 5 dimension itch scale (5d-itch scale) measuring pruritus (the 5 dimensions are degree, duration, direction, disability and distribution). Higher degree mean worse outcome \<8 on rating scale mean no pruritus, and \>22 on rating scale indicate severe pruritus
Change from Baseline in hepatobiliary fibrosis using the Nakanuma staging scale48 weeksChange from Baseline to Week 48 in liver histology using the Nakanuma stage classification. A score of 0 is classified as stage 1 (no or minimal disease progression), while 1 score 5 or 6 is classified as stage 4 (advanced disease progression).
Change from Baseline in the Mayo IBD symptom severity score48 weeksChange from Baseline to Week 48 in the Mayo Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) symptom severity score. A score of 3 to 5 points indicates mildly active disease and a score of 11 to 12 points indicates severely active bowel disease
Change from Baseline in the revised Mayo risk score (rMRS)48 weeksChange from Baseline to Week 48 in the revised Mayo risk score (rMRS). The score provide the estimated probability of survival (%) based on age, bilirubin, AST, and history of bleeding
Change from Baseline in the UK-PSC score48 weeksChange from Baseline to Week 48 in the united kingdom primary sclerosing cholangitis (UK-PSC) score. The score provide the estimated probability of survival (%) based on age, bilirubin, albumin, platelets, hemoglobin and ALP
Change from Baseline in the PSC risk estimate tool (PREsTo)48 weeksChange from Baseline to Week 48 in the PSC risk estimate tool (PREsTo). The tool consists of bilirubin, albumin, ALP, platelets, AST, hemoglobin, sodium, patient age and the number of years since PSC was diagnosed, and it predicts short-term and long-term need for liver transplantation or death.
Change from Baseline to Week 48 in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-19 score48 weeksChange from Baseline to Week 48 in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-19 questionnaire score. The average score for Physical Function is 50, with a score of 40 considered below average and a score of 60 considered above average

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026