Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Vedolizumab Combined With Upadacitinib in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Sequential Treatment of Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis With Vedolizumab and Upadacitinib: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06095596
Enrollment
334
Registered
2023-10-23
Start date
2023-11-01
Completion date
2026-10-31
Last updated
2026-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ulcerative Colitis (UC)

Brief summary

It's of great importance to effectively induce and maintain disease remission in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Vedolizumab (VDZ) is known for its high safety profile and confirmed therapeutic efficacy in UC treatment. However, according to the experience in clinical practice, the effect onset speed of vedolizumab is relatively slow. Upadacitinib (UPA), however, works quickly, which complements the defect of slow onset of VDZ induction. However, the safety of UPA used in situations such as infection and tumors is inferior to that of VDZ, and long-term use requires testing for the risk of adverse events such as deep vein thrombosis. Therefore, if the advantages of long-term maintenance therapy safety of VDZ and rapid induced remission of UPA are fully utilized, the combination of VDZ and UPA induction for 8 weeks, followed by the use of single drug VDZ in maintenance therapy, can maximize the clinical benefits of UC patients. Due to the lack of high-level clinical research data at home and abroad, we plan to conduct a multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical study to provide the evidence-based basis for the efficacy analysis of the sequential treatment of moderate to severe UC patients with VDZ and UPA.

Interventions

DRUGUpadacitinib

Oral upadacitinib 45mg/d for 8 weeks in the induction therapy.

DRUGVedolizumab

Vedolizumab 300mg intravenously on weeks 1, 2, 6, and then on every 8-week interval.

Sponsors

Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed UC for at least 3 months, including endoscopic evidence supporting UC and histopathological evidence supporting UC diagnosis * Suffering from moderate to severe UC, defined as modified Mayo score ≥ 4 and endoscopic subscale (ESS) ≥ 2 * Indications for VDZ or UPA application

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are unable to take oral UPA and receive regular intravenous VDZ infusion therapy * Evidence of toxic megacolon was found during screening * Previously underwent extensive colectomy, subtotal resection, or total colectomy, ileostomy, or colostomy due to UC * Subjects who require surgery due to UC or plan to undergo elective surgery during the study period * There is evidence indicating that the subjects suffer from severe, progressive, or uncontrolled kidney, liver, blood, endocrine, respiratory, mental, or neurological diseases * Evidence of active hepatitis B or C infection during screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
8th-week endoscopic remission rate8th-weekendoscopic subscale (ESS) =0, which defined as endoscopic remission

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical remission rate at the 8th week8th-weekClinical remission is defined as a total Mayo score ≤2, with no individual subscore \>1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0.
clincial response rate at 8th-week8th-weekClinical response is defined as a decrease in total Mayo score by ≥3 points and ≥30% from baseline, with a decrease in rectal bleeding subscore by ≥1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1.
Endoscopic response rate at 8th-week8th-weekEndoscopic response is defined as a decrease in the Mayo endoscopic subscore by ≥1 point from baseline
normalization rate of CRP at the 8th week8th-weeknormalization rate of C reactive protein (CRP)
life quality score at the 8th week8th-weekInflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ), the total score is 32-224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life for patients.
Clinical remission rate at the 54th-week54th-weekclincial remisson is defined as a total Mayo score ≤2, with no individual subscore \>1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0.
Clinical response rate at 54th week54th weekClinical response is defined as a decrease in total Mayo score by ≥3 points and ≥30% from baseline, with a decrease in rectal bleeding subscore by ≥1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1.
endoscopic remission rate at 54th-week54th-weekendoscopic subscale (ESS) =0, which defined as endoscopic remission
Endoscopic response rate at 54th-week54th-weekEndoscopic response is defined as a decrease in the Mayo endoscopic subscore by ≥1 point from baseline
normalization rate of CRP at the 54th week54th-weeknormalization rate of CRP
life quality score at the 54th week54th-weekInflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ), the total score is 32-224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life for patients.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 29, 2026