Skip to content

Post-operative Sensitivity in Composite Restorations

Post-operative Sensitivity in Composites Using Bulk-fill vs. Oblique Incremental Placement Technique: a Double-blind, Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06092567
Enrollment
90
Registered
2023-10-23
Start date
2022-12-20
Completion date
2023-07-24
Last updated
2023-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Class II Dental Caries, Sensitivity, Tooth

Brief summary

Participants will be divided into groups. In group A, Composite restoration done using oblique incremental technique. In group B, Bulk-fill technique was used. VAS scoring to evaluate the primary outcome at one day, one week and two weeks.

Detailed description

After the approval from ethical research committee, a written informed consent taken. Participants were briefed about the intervention with its associated merits and demerits. The restorative procedures were accomplished under rubber dam isolation using adequate local anesthesia. The principles of minimally intervention and adhesive dentistry were employed. Participants were allocated into two groups. In group A, restorative interventive was performed using Oblique incremental placement while in group B, Bulk-fill technique was used. Post-operative sensitivity was recorded at one day, one week and two week follow up using a Visual analogue scale.

Interventions

PROCEDUREGroup A ( Oblique Incremental Placement Technique)

In this interventional group, a Nanohybrid composite resin Nexcomp (Meta Biomed, Korea) was placed using an oblique incremental technique with increments not exceeding 2 mm in thickness.

PROCEDUREGroup B (Bulk-fill Placement technique)

In this group, a composite Beautifil-Bulk Restorative (SHOFU dental) was utilized for restorative purposes using a bulk-fill technique with a thickness of 4 mm

Sponsors

Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

This is a double-blinded study in which the participant and the outcome assessor masked.

Intervention model description

In this study, participants allocated in two groups by Consecutive non-random sampling technique

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Minimum 18 years of age with good general health * Vital and Periodontally stable teeth * Class-II primary carious lesions with a cavity depth of 3 to 5 mm * Established contact with adjacent and opposing natural or prosthetic teeth * Prior defective restorations in need of replacement (secondary caries, marginal fractures, and marginal staining)

Exclusion criteria

* Teeth with a history of spontaneous pain * Compromised oral health status * Patients with parafunctional habits or temporomandibular disorders * Previously endodontically treated teeth or evidence of associated periapical/periodontal pathosis * Participants with a drug history of using anti-inflammatory, analgesics, or psychotropic medications within the last 2 weeks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-operative sensitivity in composite resin restorationTwo weeksEvaluation of post-restorative sensitivity in composite restorations using Visual analogue scale score with scoring from 0 to 10. Score 0 (none), 1 to 3 (mild), 4 to 6 (moderate), and 7 to 10 (severe).

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026