Skip to content

Does Teaching Before or After Simulation Improve Learning?

Outcome of a Lecture Before vs After Simulation-based Education on Pediatric Status Epileptics: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06092320
Enrollment
40
Registered
2023-10-23
Start date
2023-09-20
Completion date
2025-06-30
Last updated
2024-07-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Medical Education, Simulation

Keywords

Medical Education, Simulation, Pediatrics

Brief summary

The goal of the randomized educational intervention study is to test whether simulation preceding didactic teaching leads to improved knowledge and performance retention compared to a didactic lecture proceeding simulation for medical students Participants will be randomized to one of two different groups with reverse orders for simulation and lectures. Researchers will compare each group to see which way is better for learning.

Interventions

OTHERSimulation on Pediatric Status Epilepticus

The participants will complete a simulation session and debrief lead by a pediatric emergency medicine physician on status epilepticus.

OTHERDidactic Lecture on Pediatric Status Epilepticus

The participants will complete a lecture on pediatric status epilepticus

Sponsors

University of British Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants will not know the specific pediatric resuscitation simulation they will be completing. Simulation reviewers will not know which arm of the intervention the participants are in.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Second year medical student at the University of British Columbia

Exclusion criteria

\- None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline in resuscitation performance retention score 2 months post-initial training assessed using global simulation performance scoreFrom initial simulation until repeat simulation 2 months laterThe scoring sheet used will be the Global Simulation performance score a one to seven scale that assess over medical expertise performance in the simulation with higher values representing increased competence.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in knowledge assessment score at 2 months post-initial training assessed using an MCQFrom initial knowledge test until repeat testing 2 months laterThe knowledge test is a 15 questions multiple choice exam scored from 0 to 15 with higher numbers representing a higher score.
Learner satisfaction measured by Likert scale items after each simulation debriefSingle time metric completed five minutes after initial simulation sessionThe Likert scale will be a one to five scale with higher scores representing increased satisfaction
Time to resuscitation metricsThe time for each metric will be measured once during the second evaluatory simulation 2 months after the initial simulation and participant enrolment.The following time to metrics will be measured from simulation start until completion of each activity within that simulation: glucose check, IV access, first-line anti-epileptic administration, second-line anti-epileptic administration, chemistry panel

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactJohn Ramsay, MD
john.ramsay1@phsa.ca(604) 875-2345

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026