Atrial Fibrillation
Conditions
Keywords
Connected Watch, Atrial Fibrilation (AF), Atrial Arythmia AA, Implantable Loop Recorder (ILR)
Brief summary
New-onset of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial arrythmia (AA) in general, is important as it exposes patients to stroke or other embolic complications not to mention the risk of heart failure. AF detection in high risk populations such as patients with a recent stroke or TIA or, symptomatic patients with multiple risk factors for AF, is performed with long-term electrocardiography monitoring using frequently implantable loop recorders (ILR). These recorders have their own limitations related to the invasive nature of the device implanted under the skin of the chest with limited acceptation by the patients. Smart watches appear as useful alternatives, but they need to be evaluated in an all-comer population of patients highly exposed to AF, different from the large population studies conducted in healthy young adults with a low incidence of AF. The unique features of CardiacSense Medical System suggest that we could have an accurate noninvasive detection of AF in a selected population very much exposed to the risk of atrial fibrillation, the most frequent atrial arrhythmia.
Detailed description
Study design : This clinical investigation is a comparative, non-randomised, one group, controlled study. Each patient represents its own control. The study will envolve 400 participants Hypothesis : Our hypothesis is that CardiacSense Medical System is an effective, safe, and better accepted alternative for detecting atrial fibrillation (AF) in a high-risk population than implantable loop recorders (ILRs). Population : Any patient aged 18 years or more, with an ILR implanted for the detection of AF will be eligible. The time of implantation will not matter as long as the batteries work. Each patient will be proposed a CS Medical Watch for a period corresponding to the period at risk of AF. Main objective : To compare the performance of the CardiacSense Medical Watch by pulse plethysmography (PPG) only to the gold standard method of ILR monitoring, to detect AF that lasts 5 minutes or more, in a population of patients at high risk of paroxysmal AF.
Interventions
DEVICECS Medical Watch
The Use of the CS Medical Watch during the participation period of the clinical investigation (between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF).
OTHERSpecific questionnaire
Specific questionnaire during the last study visit (takes place at M3 to M12 according to the period at risk of AF)
Sponsors
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Action Research Group
Hôpital Lariboisière Fernand Widal
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
This clinical investigation is a comparative, one group, controlled study. Each patient represents its own control. Patients with an ILR already implanted for the detection of AF will receive a CS Medical Watch for a period corresponding to the period at risk of AF, up to 1 year maximum. For each patient, results obtained with the ILR device will be compared to results obtained with the CS Medical Watch device. During the conduct of the study, all medical decisions will be taken according to the ILR already implanted. No medical decision will be taken on CardiacSense System information collected during the study.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patient aged 18 years or more * Patient having signed free, informed, and written consent * Patient presenting one of the following situations : * Post-stroke or TIA patient with an already in place ILR * Patient with symptoms evocative of AF (e.g. increased heart rate, chest pain) with an already in place ILR * Post-PFO closure patient with an already in place ILR * Patient in sinus rhythm treated for the prevention of paroxysmal AF with an already in place ILR * Patient at high risk of AF (at the discretion of the investigator) with an already in place ILR * Patient with a period of risk of AF ≥ 3 months.
Exclusion criteria
* Patient under legal protection * Pregnant and/or breastfeeding women * Patient with pacemakers, or ICD * Patient with blood flow deficiency-related conditions * Patient with tattoo or injured skin on the wrist * Patient with tremors or otherwise unable to remain still for 15 minutes * Patient without two hands and sufficient fingers to complete the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The total number of episodes AF that lasts 5 min or more recorded on long-term monitoring | between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF | The total number of episodes AF that lasts 5 min or more recorded on long-term monitoring using the CardiacSense Medical Watch by pulse plethysmography (PPG) only vs the gold standard method of ILR ECG recording, over the same period of monitoring by the two devices for each patient. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The total number of AA episodes that lasts 5 min or more recorded on long-term monitoring | between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF | The total number of AA episodes that lasts 5 min or more detected by PPG and confirmed by ECG measurement of the CardiacSense Medical Watch (vs. ILR ECG recording) over the same period of monitoring by the two devices for each patient. |
| The total number of episodes AF that lasts 5 min or more recorded on long-term monitoring | between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF | Same primary endpoint for symptomatic patients vs. asymptomatic patients |
| The total duration of AF episodes that lasts 5 min or more | between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF | Total duration of AF episodes that lasts 5 min or more / total duration of monitoring expressed in % for each device (PPG CS watch only vs. ILR ECG recording). |
| Incidence and severity of CS device vs ILR devices | between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF | Related Adverse Events and incidents during the patient participation |
| Degree of invasiveness, comfort, and ease of use of both devices | between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF | Description : measured using specific questionnaires for the study |
| Medico-economic evaluation according to the AP-HP hospital costs | between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF | * The cost of each medical device (considering the replacement when needed over the study period for each patient) * The cost for extra-consultation/hospitalization for surgery, complication, or education. |
Outcome results
None listed