Skip to content

Malnutrition Screening and Dietary Intervention to Improve Nutrition Outcomes in Patients With Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer

Malnutrition Screening and Nutrition Optimization to Improve Outcomes in Patients With Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06090916
Enrollment
100
Registered
2023-10-19
Start date
2023-01-17
Completion date
2028-03-31
Last updated
2026-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Non-resectable, Stage III Pancreatic Cancer

Brief summary

This clinical trial compares the effect of malnutrition screening and dietary intervention to standard nutrition care on patients with pancreatic cancer that cannot be removed by surgery (unresectable). Fewer than 20% of patients diagnosed with unresectable pancreatic cancer do not survive one year after diagnosis so treatment often focuses on improving quality of life. Many patients experience increasing pain, nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, weight loss and weakness. Behavioral interventions use techniques to help patients change the way they react to environmental triggers that may cause a negative reaction. Screening for inadequate nutrition (malnutrition) and providing weekly nutritional support may be effective methods to improve nutritional status and improve overall quality of life for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the quality of life of subjects after 12 weeks between the intervention group with nutrition optimization with dietary prescription and nutrition support in comparison to standard care. II. To compare the frequency of hospitalization and length of stay (LOS) after 12 weeks between the intervention group with nutrition optimization with dietary prescription and nutrition support in comparison to standard care. III. To compare the subject's functional status, body weight and dietary intake after 12 weeks between the intervention group with nutrition optimization with dietary prescription and nutrition support in comparison to standard care. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive standard nutrition care and record dietary intake and physical activity using Myfitness Pal smartphone application on study. ARM II: Patients undergo malnutrition screening with a registered dietician at baseline and participate in 12 weekly nutrition support sessions and those at moderate to high risk for malnutrition receive a personalized diet prescription on study. Patients also record dietary intake and physical activity using Myfitness Pal smartphone application on study.

Interventions

OTHERBest Practice

Receive standard nutrition care

OTHERDietary Intervention

Participate in weekly support sessions with diet prescription

OTHERMedical Chart Review

Ancillary studies

OTHERMedical Device Usage and Evaluation

Record dietary and physical activity using MyFitnessPal smartphone app

OTHERNutritional Assessment

Undergo malnutrition screening

OTHERQuestionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Sponsors

Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
Silicon Valley Community Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, receiving either 1) no chemotherapy, 2) 1st cycle of chemotherapy, or 3) greater than 1 cycle of chemotherapy if the patient's prognosis is greater than 6 months as determined by oncology collaborators * Life expectancy of greater than 3 months and a Karnofsky performance score of 60 or more * Adults \>= 18 years old male or female

Exclusion criteria

* Ascites requiring paracentesis for symptom improvement * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values greater than 5 times the upper limit of normal * Creatinine value greater than 2.0 for men and 1.5 for women * Uncontrolled pain * Uncontrolled nausea and vomiting

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life measured comparing changes in outcomes between study armsAfter 12 weeksMeasured using short form 36. A two-sample t-test comparing changes from baseline in each of the outcomes between study arms used to estimate power
Frequency of hospitalizationsAfter 12 weeksHospitalization defined as any stay in the hospital \> 24 hours. A two-sample t-test comparing changes from baseline in each of the outcomes between study arms used to estimate power
Length of hospital stayAfter 12 weeksLength of stay determined by the number of days of hospitalization including the date of admission and not including the day of discharge from the hospital. A two-sample t-test comparing changes from baseline in each of the outcomes between study arms used to estimate power
Functional status using Karnofsky performance scoreAfter 12 weeksThe Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) is a standardized measure used to assess a patient's ability to perform everyday tasks. It ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better function.
Percent change in body weightBaseline to after 12 weeksCollected from patient medical record. A two-sample t-test comparing changes from baseline in each of the outcomes between study arms used to estimate power
Average daily stepsAfter 12 weeksDaily steps recorded using MyfitnessPal. A two-sample t-test comparing changes from baseline in each of the outcomes between study arms used to estimate power
Calorie intake from Myfitness PalAfter 12 weeksFood intake collected every 4 weeks and uploaded into patients medical record via patient portal. A two-sample t-test comparing changes from baseline in each of the outcomes between study arms used to estimate power

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORZhaoPing Li

UCLA / Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 27, 2026